Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Stadt

Forum Supporter
  • Posts

    31,358
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    42

Everything posted by Stadt

  1. Yeah mostly in years with lower transfer spending and they haven’t had multiple European campaigns.
  2. We should have seen hundreds of job losses already, the fact we haven’t is part of of the problem. He either doesn’t know or doesn’t care about the perilous financial position.
  3. Well firstly clubs in the Premier League spend hundreds of millions, it’s the nature of the beast. But let’s take three highest sales - Maguire, Mahrez and Fofana, there’s about £200m in sales across three players. We are an abysmally ran club but our wage bill is the problem, not our transfer spending. We’re partly in this mess because we didn’t spend enough on fees. Had we spent an extra £10m here or there on players we’d have a much better side - e.g allocating some of the wage bill on actually buying players like Ademola Lookman, now at Atletico we wouldn’t have plummeted like we did. These figures obviously aren’t controlled for number of seasons but - we haven’t spent that much considering we’ve won the league and had 3 seasons in Europe. Especially when we’ve spent most of our time in the PL during an inflationary period. Its remarkable we’ve spent less than Southampton tbh. And as for the surplus line…
  4. We haven’t spent much on transfer fees relatively - we have a transfer surplus over the past 10 years.. It’s the wage bill and not shifting players that’s been the problem. Tielemans was our record signing and he was about £35m max.
  5. Clarifying and reasserting that he does actually think Top is an idiot is great. They can’t mention everything given time constraints but they didn’t even cover that we have TWO training grounds. We’ve not even reduced the headcount, we still have far too many stewards and stupid pre-match flamethrowers.
  6. Drops deep and links up better here than I’ve ever seen Ayew do
  7. Refuse
  8. Politics is irrelevant to this. The replies to King Power Out twitter account had loons from all over the political spectrum defending KP. Some I-heart-the-NHS, f uck the Tories types accounts were ardently KP in just as some Stop the boats accounts were. Some far right accounts were arguing amongst themselves.
  9. "Right I've had enough! Somebody else sort out a protest!" Categorically, there will be a march for Norwich
  10. God why do our fanbase love dragging our better players. If we had an absolute GRAFTER with 2 goals but LOADS of blocked crosses that'd be preferable for some. Without him we'd be about relegated already.
  11. Top would be incapable of replacing Rudkin even if that c unt resigned. We replaced Whelan with a Thai customer services manager. Top is even more incompetent than Rudkin. They come as a pair
  12. We don’t have a defensive midfielder, we have one striker that scores a goal every 10 games. No clean sheet in 26 (?) games. We’ve lost to 22nd and 23rd this season. Only laboured past unfit, unpaid, 10 men Sheffield Wednesday with 2 set piece goals. We don’t have a manager, we’re not looking like appointing one anytime soon. Delusional if you think we won’t be relegated, have you not learned anything from the past 3 or 4 years?
  13. It’s beyond Rudkin. if you’re at the sack Rudkin stage and not King Power out you’re thick, sorry
  14. If administration is what it takes then so be it. The bloke is a C UNT. Worse than Wise or any other minor villain. It’s sabotage.
  15. We won;t appoint anybody with a reasonable track record. Gerrard could have his pick of several better jobs than ours that will come up
  16. We're in a sort of Cellino/Hockaday situation where we're such a farce the only managers that will take the role are just grateful for an opportunity magnitudes greater than their ability. Cifuentes was arguably an example of this already. Managers mostly aren't thick, their agents will be well connected.
  17. Because they keep losing substantial amounts of money. They’ve made a loss in 4/5 of the last sets of accounts. Top was sidelined in the business so now the new (astute) CEO isn’t going to be interested in supporting Top’s unsuccessful folly. If we get relegated we’re going to have significantly lower income and still have several loans to pay back. Given we rack up extraordinary losses in the PL with more competent people in the building it’s going to grisly when we run out of family silver e.g Fatawu
  18. £2.6bn in assets, very little of that is liquid cash. Given KP has struggled recently Top’s extremely expensive and unsuccessful side project isn’t going to be funded indefinitely. The club has lost about £400m under his watch, there won’t be any low interest loans from KP anymore and they won’t convert anymore debt into equity. Its already unsustainable and the fact the headcount hasn’t shrunk at all in non-core areas proves he just has his head in the sand.
  19. We don’t know of any interest because at least publicly the club isn’t up for sale. If the club continues to operate with big losses Top can’t sustain it. We will be wound up if we can’t repay the Macquarie loans
  20. Say Rudkin is forced out, then you trust Top to appoint a successor? He can’t. He’s incapable. Rudkin IS King Power now
  21. Looked to see if Kopfkino had posted relatively recently after not noticing any posts for a few years - account deleted. Shame. ttfn was a top poster as well.
  22. My initial thought was that more than 50 younger blokes in special forces units would be able to
  23. Stadt

    When Taken

    #WhenTaken #713 (09.02.2026) I scored 909/1000👑 1️⃣📍341 km - 🗓️5 yrs - 🥇184/200 2️⃣📍221 km - 🗓️8 yrs - 🥇181/200 3️⃣📍257 km - 🗓️2 yrs - 🥇189/200 4️⃣📍600 km - 🗓️2 yrs - 🥇180/200 5️⃣📍190 km - 🗓️11 yrs - 🥇175/200 https://whentaken.com
×
×
  • Create New...