Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Guest Bilo

Next Leader of the Opposition

  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Labour Party (v2)

    • Andy Burnham
      6
    • Yvette Cooper
      2
    • Jeremy Corbyn
      46
    • Liz Kendall
      7


Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah it's fine when Corbyn's supporters are being called anti-semites and misogynists and when you attack them saying they label anyone but Corbyn is a tory.

 

People haven't said that of Corbyns supporters... they've said that the trains policy is arguably misogynistic, and to an extent it is - what is says is that women should accept that they should be harassed and just move if they don't want to be; and Corbyn may not be an anti-semite, but he at least associates readily with antisemitic groups.

Posted

People haven't said that of Corbyns supporters... they've said that the trains policy is arguably misogynistic, and to an extent it is - what is says is that women should accept that they should be harassed and just move if they don't want to be; and Corbyn may not be an anti-semite, but he at least associates readily with antisemitic groups.

No not on here, but that's a lot of the rubbish coming from twitter, especially mutants like Louise Mensch.
Posted

Mutants like Louise Mensch - who is a Tory (a shit MP and actually surprising thick for an Oxbridge grad) and therefore not in the Burnham, Cooper or Kendall tents, because she neither wants nor is entitled to a vote?

 

If some Corbyn supporters are getting a bad rap outside of the party as well as within it, perhaps they ought to conduct themselves with something resembling decency. 

Posted

People haven't said that of Corbyns supporters... they've said that the trains policy is arguably misogynistic, and to an extent it is - what is says is that women should accept that they should be harassed and just move if they don't want to be; and Corbyn may not be an anti-semite, but he at least associates readily with antisemitic groups.

 

I haven't seen anyone call Corbyn supporters misogynists or anti-semites. I've seen them called Trots, bandwagon jumpers, morons and naive idealists though. I don't approve of any of those labels, Labour supporters need to stick together at the moment, but it's not as if they've been shy in doling out abuse - quite the opposite in fact.

If I was voting with my cock she'd be a shoe-in.. lol

 

Kendall as leader with Luciana Berger as deputy - the (wet) dream team. :ph34r:

Posted

No not on here, but that's a lot of the rubbish coming from twitter, especially mutants like Louise Mensch.

 

I'd like to just say that that's probably because it's Louise Mensch, who is to put it politely, a jibbering moron who has been right precisely once, and that's over the other jibbering moron that is Gormless George.

Posted

I'd like to just say that that's probably because it's Louise Mensch, who is to put it politely, a jibbering moron who has been right precisely once, and that's over the other jibbering moron that is Gormless George.

 

Yeah, Louise Mensch is basically a thinking man's Katie Hopkins. 

 

The only people who didn't think Gormless George was acting like a cvnt during the GE were the kind of people who probably still point at aeroplanes.

Posted

Yeah, Louise Mensch is basically a thinking man's Katie Hopkins.

You would, though, wouldn't you.

The only people who didn't think Gormless George was acting like a cvnt during the GE were the kind of people who probably still point at aeroplanes.

:crylaugh:

Guest MattP
Posted

If we're talking fantasies what about Caroline Flint? Still the filthiest of the lot for me.

All has a great story about her. I'd love to Mensch though.

Posted

This thread has taken a very FoxesTalk turn! lol

Posted

True story. At the risk of coming over all Sidebar of Shame, we do have some attractive MPs these days....

Posted

The Honourable Member for Ashfield. That's all I'm saying.

url-11.jpeg

She could have my honourable member..

Posted

They have not published the full information that was  asked for because  'it would not be in the public's interest' 

The DWP will have watered the report down. You have to be naive not to realise this is why they took so long, launched appeal after appeal and used delaying tactics. The last appeal in May I think was submitted under a hour before the deadline.

If they had nothing to hide why did they not publish the figures which they repeatedly said  they did not hold but it was known that they did (they have just done it) they were told by high court judges that they must comply with the FOI act and there was no legitimate reason why they should not.

Taking a neutral viewpoint and forgetting any bias in favour of the Tories does these actions by the DWP seem a little iffy?

Question not aimed at you bmt. Like I said I saw it earlier but the report was still being analised.

 

Snigger.

Posted

Analysed? Spellchecker accepted it.

 

 

Please Google analised.  You might want to have a tissue to hand.

Posted

Please Google analised.  You might want to have a tissue to hand.

Yeah simple slip.its how I speak Lestah. Anyway I guess they will not do what my post said.

Posted

Please Google analised. You might want to have a tissue to hand.

lol

Rince should have his own thread:

'The Kenglish Dictionary of Words and Phrases'.

Posted

Yeah simple slip.its how I speak Lestah. Anyway I guess they will not do what my post said.

 

That's what they all say the first time.

Posted

They have not published the full information that was asked for because 'it would not be in the public's interest'

The DWP will have watered the report down. You have to be naive not to realise this is why they took so long, launched appeal after appeal and used delaying tactics. The last appeal in May I think was submitted under a hour before the deadline.

If they had nothing to hide why did they not publish the figures which they repeatedly said they did not hold but it was known that they did (they have just done it) they were told by high court judges that they must comply with the FOI act and there was no legitimate reason why they should not.

Taking a neutral viewpoint and forgetting any bias in favour of the Tories does these actions by the DWP seem a little iffy?

Question not aimed at you bmt. Like I said I saw it earlier but the report was still being analysed..

At the last PMQ David Cameron was questioned on the subject, they are being released but they are being checked and scrutinised by a 3rd party similar to the OBR in respect that they have no political agenda.

This has to be done before they are published, as far as I'm aware they are being checked now, don't quote me on it though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...