Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Harry - LCFC

General Election, June 8th

Recommended Posts

Posted

I do have some sympathy for little Timmy. As long as he doesn't discriminate against gays, whether he thinks they're going to heaven or hell is immaterial . He shouldn't have to renounce his faith to stand for election.

Posted
Just now, Webbo said:

I do have some sympathy for little Timmy. As long as he doesn't discriminate against gays, whether he thinks they're going to heaven or hell is immaterial . He shouldn't have to renounce his faith to stand for election.

Yeah I agree, has anyone asked Sadiq Kahn his stance? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Webbo said:

I do have some sympathy for little Timmy. As long as he doesn't discriminate against gays, whether he thinks they're going to heaven or hell is immaterial . He shouldn't have to renounce his faith to stand for election.

He already stood for election, and won, and stood for the leadership of the party, and won.  He hasn't had to renounce anything.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jon the Hat said:

He already stood for election, and won, and stood for the leadership of the party, and won.  He hasn't had to renounce anything.

His religious beliefs are his own. He doesn't (as far as I know) stand on a platform of being the christian candidate. I think it's illiberal to hound him on the subject.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Webbo said:

His religious beliefs are his own. He doesn't (as far as I know) stand on a platform of being the christian candidate. I think it's illiberal to hound him on the subject.

 

Politicians, particularly those who aspire to lead the country, are held to more exacting standards than others, and it could be argued that his stance on Gay marriage (and his refusal to answer whether he considers gay sex a sin) shows him to be possibly homophobic. Whether those beliefs stem from his religious faith or not, they are unacceptable in someone in a position of power.

Posted
1 minute ago, Buce said:

 

Politicians, particularly those who aspire to lead the country, are held to more exacting standards than others, and it could be argued that his stance on Gay marriage (and his refusal to answer whether he considers gay sex a sin) shows him to be possibly homophobic. Whether those beliefs stem from his religious faith or not, they are unacceptable in modern society.

Yeah everyone knows that it's fat people and gingers that get the abuse in modern society. Gays are fine now.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Yeah everyone knows that it's fat people and gingers that get the abuse in modern society. Gays are fine now.

 

Actually, I edited that for the sake of clarity, but surely you don't think homophobia acceptable? I don't have a problem with people holding those views privately, but I do in a politician.

 

Aren't Gingers covered by disability legislation?

 

And how gay are you going to look in a pair of Chino shorts? lol 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

Politicians, particularly those who aspire to lead the country, are held to more exacting standards than others, and it could be argued that his stance on Gay marriage (and his refusal to answer whether he considers gay sex a sin) shows him to be possibly homophobic. Whether those beliefs stem from his religious faith or not, they are unacceptable in someone in a position of power.

As I said, as long as he doesn't discriminate against gays then his beliefs are his own business. We can't have a system where only people with the correct opinions are allowed to stand.

Posted
Just now, Buce said:

 

Actually, I edited that for the sake of clarity, but surely you don't think homophobia acceptable? I don't have a problem with people holding those views privately, but I do in a politician.

 

Aren't Gingers covered by disability legislation?

 

No I don't think homophobia is acceptable but I understand it makes some people uncomfortable. I actually think the whole homophobia thing has come a long way and the subject is by and large these days accepted. I rarely hear nasty homophobia like you used too. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Webbo said:

As I said, as long as he doesn't discriminate against gays then his beliefs are his own business. We can't have a system where only people with the correct opinions are allowed to stand.

He is being asked his opinion on Gay rights no?  We have a right to know that opinion, regardless of why he holds it.  This is a policy position, not a personal opinion.  He should be able to say that he supports Gay rights, whilst also holding a personal belief that it is against the bible or whatever.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

He is being asked his opinion on Gay rights no?  We have a right to know that opinion, regardless of why he holds it.  This is a policy position, not a personal opinion.  He should be able to say that he supports Gay rights, whilst also holding a personal belief that it is against the bible or whatever.

He has been asked whether he thinks they go to heaven or hell lol, a step too far IMO.

Posted
Just now, Strokes said:

He has been asked whether he thinks they go to heaven or hell lol, a step too far IMO.

Yeah well there are always stupid questions from the press.

 

To be honest, much more importantly, can we trust the judgement of people who believe in sky fairies?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

He is being asked his opinion on Gay rights no?  We have a right to know that opinion, regardless of why he holds it.  This is a policy position, not a personal opinion.  He should be able to say that he supports Gay rights, whilst also holding a personal belief that it is against the bible or whatever.

But why do you need to know? If you're asking whether he would vote against gay rights,abortion, divorce laws, whatever, they are legitimate questions. What he thinks is a sin is between him and his conscience. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jon the Hat said:

Yeah well there are always stupid questions from the press.

 

To be honest, much more importantly, can we trust the judgement of people who believe in sky fairies?

Well I wouldn't vote for him or any other person of strong religious beliefs but I think people should be able to make up their own minds. We all know that certain religions are exclusive and the details are well documented, that is where it should end IMO.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Strokes said:

He has been asked whether he thinks they go to heaven or hell lol, a step too far IMO.

 

Given the circles the press operate in and the extracting nature of that question (it's not a question the press would come up with on their own), I suspect they have got wind of something Farron may have said but it's not possible to confirm it.

 

 

 

 

Posted

We have Theresa May and Tim Farron who are essentially Anglican neo-fundamentalists spilling their bile in mainstream media "if God disapproves of your lifestyle we aren't going to fund it" deary me

Posted
23 minutes ago, Webbo said:

As I said, as long as he doesn't discriminate against gays then his beliefs are his own business. We can't have a system where only people with the correct opinions are allowed to stand.

 

He abstained from voting (I think) to legalise Gay Marriage. Isn't that discriminating? Would society accept a prospective PM that abstained, or voted against, race legislation (for example)? I suggest not.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Strokes said:

 

No I don't think homophobia is acceptable but I understand it makes some people uncomfortable. I actually think the whole homophobia thing has come a long way and the subject is by and large these days accepted. I rarely hear nasty homophobia like you used too

 

Maybe you should get out more:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-39678737

Posted

Is this some kind of meme war distorted news era of bullet point politics - the slant on it all is pretty lame:

 

may-civil-liberties.png?w=529&h=345

Posted
12 minutes ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

 

 

 

:nigel: Nutter

Can only assume Jon won't be trusting her based upon that

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...