Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, lfu said:

The cricket club are objecting to the hotel and residential tower

The whole regeneration of the area is the best thing to happen to the city in years.

 

Anyone against any of the plans is terribly selfish. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Environmentalist is complaining now

He’s going to be complaining even more now after being told it passes and exceeded expected biodiversity levels 

 

cricket club not happy that Stumps will be a little shadowed caused by the buildings 

Posted
2 minutes ago, FoyleFox said:

Any objections of actual substance or the general whinging types?

The cricket club's objection was regarding how tall the towers would be because they'd be blocking daylight, and the increased traffic it would bring making it even harder for them to access their ground on matchdays

Posted
4 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

He’s going to be complaining even more now after being told it passes and exceeded expected biodiversity levels 

 

cricket club not happy that Stumps will be a little shadowed caused by the buildings 

Wasn't the cricket club issue brought up ages ago? I remember reading about it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, lfu said:

The cricket club's objection was regarding how tall the towers would be because they'd be blocking daylight, and the increased traffic it would bring making it even harder for them to access their ground on matchdays

Didn't they raise similar with the stadium itself, but disappeared after being given a cheque?

Posted
1 minute ago, Collymore said:

Wasn't the cricket club issue brought up ages ago? I remember reading about it. 

Yes it was but the owner of the cricket club has officially spoke about it and even tried to say the planning wording didn’t make sense an he offered a correction to it

Posted
3 minutes ago, lfu said:

The cricket club's objection was regarding how tall the towers would be because they'd be blocking daylight, and the increased traffic it would bring making it even harder for them to access their ground on matchdays

Hardly the twin towers is it lol 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Will any of these objections be of much substance going forward? 

Biodiversity was an issue club has to meet at least 10% and this project will surpass that and be 14.5% to 15% so no objection from planning officer 
 

shadow will be on the cricket club and will possibly cover 2 of the 3 wickets but planning officer don’t see this as a issues 

Edited by jammie82uk
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...