fox_up_north Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 Would we say Ward and/ or Iversen are better than at least SOME first choice keepers in the league?
Grebfromgrebland Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 2 minutes ago, fox_up_north said: Would we say Ward and/ or Iversen are better than at least SOME first choice keepers in the league? No
Dahnsouff Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 4 minutes ago, fox_up_north said: Would we say Ward and/ or Iversen are better than at least SOME first choice keepers in the league? Most probably not, but how are they supposed to improve if they are not challenged?
Leicester_Loyal Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 More this drags on the more I'm coming round to the idea of giving Iversen a chance. Only issue is that if he doesn't play well, January we'll get absolutely mullered for cash trying to sign a keeper. I really do think Ward just needs to be sold, don't think he's good enough, nor ever will be, so if that happens, then maybe we'll sign a new number 1. No point keeping 3 keepers and then signing a new one aswell, we're just hoarding them and wasting thousands a week.
weller54 Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 31 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: Some players are late developers, lucky we didn’t sell Vardy because he was older and have the same “ceiling”as a younger player. Iverson has played a lot more matches Harry Ramsdale 's kicking is suspect... always just chips the ball out. And his handling is a bit fishy. Don't want anyone like him or we'll get battered most weeks. 3
HankMarvin Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) My question is, if Iversen was as good as everyone clearly thinks. Why was he not made number 2 last season after a successful loan at Preston for 6 months and being 24 years of age . Also just 2 years ago In August 2020, Iversen joined Belgian First Division A team Oud-Heverlee Leuven on a season-long loan.[11]Iversen started five games before suffering a hip injury in the match against Oostende. Following his return from injury, he became second choice goalkeeper behind Rafael Romo, which resulted in his loan being terminated on 7 January 2021. Everyone points to a successful season at Preston and how he got player of the season in a team that finished 13th. This one season appear to be the outlier in his career. Ward earned good reviews for Huddersfield when they got promoted in 16/17 Edited 27 July 2022 by HankMarvin
Popular Post moore_94 Posted 27 July 2022 Author Popular Post Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: My question is, if Iversen was as good as everyone clearly thinks. Why was he not made number 2 last season after a successful loan at Preston for 6 months and being 24 years of age . Also just 2 years ago In August 2020, Iversen joined Belgian First Division A team Oud-Heverlee Leuven on a season-long loan.[11]Iversen started five games before suffering a hip injury in the match against Oostende. Following his return from injury, he became second choice goalkeeper behind Rafael Romo, which resulted in his loan being terminated on 7 January 2021. Everyone points to a successful season at Preston and how he got player of the season in a team that finished 13th. This one season appear to be the outlier in his career. Ward earned good reviews for Huddersfield when they got promoted in 16/17 He wasn't made number 2 here because he wanted to be playing every week rather than taking up the position Ward has of playing about 5 games in 4 years He was very good at Oldham in League Two, and at Rotherham in League One He was good in those games for Leuven but unluckily for Leuven when he got injured Romo played very well so deservedly kept first choice Then he has had a very good 18 months for Preston, with their fans often pointing out they would have finished a lot closer to the relegation zone in both seasons he was there without him Edited 27 July 2022 by moore_94 7
HankMarvin Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 2 minutes ago, moore_94 said: He wasn't made number 2 here because he wanted to be playing every week rather than taking up the position Ward has of playing about 5 games in 4 years Surely that would’ve been the clubs decision not the players, if he was a significantly better option as a number 2.
Dahnsouff Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 1 minute ago, HankMarvin said: Surely that would’ve been the clubs decision not the players, if he was a significantly better option as a number 2. Development wise in made sense, no?
moore_94 Posted 27 July 2022 Author Posted 27 July 2022 1 minute ago, HankMarvin said: Surely that would’ve been the clubs decision not the players, if he was a significantly better option as a number 2. The club will have seen it as beneficial for him to be playing every week and developing rather than rotting on our bench and not getting any game time 3
ScrumpyJack Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 Iversen being a decent replacement for Schmeichel is such a bizarre echo chamber 1
South Shire Fox Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) What was the point of signing Danny Ward for 12 million if hes not going to be given a chance at being Kaspers successor? I say give Ward/Iversen an opportunity then reassess in Jan Edited 27 July 2022 by South Shire Fox 1
HankMarvin Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 I’ve seen lots of highlight real saves, but he didn’t look to great here though. Probably a reason why only Championship clubs were sniffing round at the end of the season. Personally I’d prefer a new GK brought in 1
January48 Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 I don't really understand why Nice would want to sign him. Better chuck that money and 3 year contract at a younger keeper such the guy below or similar rather than at a 35 year old who is probably starting to enter the period of inevitable decline 2
moore_94 Posted 27 July 2022 Author Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: I’ve seen lots of highlight real saves, but he didn’t look to great here though. Probably a reason why only Championship clubs were sniffing round at the end of the season. Personally I’d prefer a new GK brought in Did you literally go searching for the 1! poor game he had for Preston? Edited 27 July 2022 by moore_94 2 1
Chrysalis Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 7 hours ago, RonnieTodger said: I’d rather we reinvested in a CB/RW than goalkeeper this season. Thats part of our problem, we have too many CBs already, we buy one almost every summer.
Lesterlad Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 20 minutes ago, South Shire Fox said: What was the point of signing Danny Ward for 12 million if hes not going to be given a chance at being Kaspers successor? I say give Ward/Iversen an opportunity then reassess in Jan Would we really want Ward as number 1. Reminds me of a peak Mark Grew
HankMarvin Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) 20 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Did you literally go searching for the 1! poor game he had for Preston? Yeah must of just stumbled on that one game how’s my luck. There are quite a lot of examples tbh, seems to be rooted to his line a lot. goals 3-4 pretty poor Edited 27 July 2022 by HankMarvin
moore_94 Posted 27 July 2022 Author Posted 27 July 2022 5 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: Yeah must of just stumbled on that one game how’s my luck. There are quite a lot of examples tbh, seems to be rooted to his line a lot. goals 3-4 pretty poor Depends if you are going to go through and watch every single game he has ever played and start only highlighting his errors, or take the opinion of Preston fan's who have watched him for 18 months who are going to have a much more well formed opinion on him 2
HankMarvin Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: Depends if you are going to go through and watch every single game he has ever played and start only highlighting his errors, or take the opinion of Preston fan's who have watched him for 18 months who are going to have a much more well formed opinion on him It’s not highlighting errors it’s looking at their biggest defeats and watching the goals. Preston fans may have slightly lower expectations. You just said Luton was his one bad performance. This looked pretty shite as well.
Legend_in_blue Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 (edited) It feels to me that in this current predicament, we are very much in a reactive stance rather than a proactive one. Worrying times. It also doesn't help that we're looking at a position that isn't a top priority for change and it takes our eyes off the situation of areas in the team that do need to be sorted asap. Edited 27 July 2022 by Legend_in_blue
moore_94 Posted 27 July 2022 Author Posted 27 July 2022 8 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: It’s not highlighting errors it’s looking at their biggest defeats and watching the goals. Preston fans may have slightly lower expectations. You just said Luton was his one bad performance. This looked pretty shite as well. I expect you are also going through and looking at his good performances as well and then forming your whole opinion on him? If you go through only looking at a goalkeepers poor games, you will think every goalkeeper is bad 1
coolhandfox Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 11 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: It’s not highlighting errors it’s looking at their biggest defeats and watching the goals. Preston fans may have slightly lower expectations. You just said Luton was his one bad performance. This looked pretty shite as well. Same fans that rate him higher then Pickford who they had on loan, 12 month before Everton paid 25m for him.
Leeds Fox Posted 27 July 2022 Posted 27 July 2022 1 hour ago, HankMarvin said: My question is, if Iversen was as good as everyone clearly thinks. Why was he not made number 2 last season after a successful loan at Preston for 6 months and being 24 years of age . Everyone points to a successful season at Preston and how he got player of the season in a team that finished 13th. This one season appear to be the outlier in his career. Ward earned good reviews for Huddersfield when they got promoted in 16/17 How would we have benefitted recalling him halfway through a very successful loan spell, when we didn’t really need him back? Would’ve made no sense and being counterproductive to the reason he was sent on loan.
Recommended Posts