Joel Piroe

[lcfc sheff]

Can we ban “ITKs” , I’m convinced it’s the same person making new accounts every window. Always seems to be a different person after the lack bloke gets found out for what I can tell just using Twitter rumours. 

[Cainy47]

I know they are looking to move some on ,but currently we have 5 goalkeepers,but can't have 4 strikers , I know what I'd rather have , but can't hang around ,GET IT DONE 

[Dahnsouff]

If he came in, then Kel would be leaving, so....

 

 

[Deeg67]

Leeds pretty much has to do whatever they can to get this across the line.  For us he'd be a luxury item, for them he'd be a blood transfusion.

[Dahnsouff]

4 minutes ago, Cainy47 said:

I know they are looking to move some on ,but currently we have 5 goalkeepers,but can't have 4 strikers , I know what I'd rather have , but can't hang around ,GET IT DONE 

Yeah but repeating a problem you currently have would be disastrous - we just don't need this guy at the moment

[Bordersfox]

14 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

Can we ban “ITKs” , I’m convinced it’s the same person making new accounts every window. Always seems to be a different person after the lack bloke gets found out for what I can tell just using Twitter rumours. 

What you don't enjoy 8 pages of people losing their sh1t over some made up rumour?

 

For shame.   

[Tommy Fresh]

5 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

If he came in, then Kel would be leaving, so....

 

 

Why does it? Daka doesn't seem wanted and seems likely to leave, so you think us signing Piroe means we'd then be comfortable enough to let Iheanacho go and be left with Piroe and Vardy?

[James_lcfc]

Wasn't it the LL post in the previous Iheanacho thread that got it deleted?

 

I assumed he was a genuine ITK after that, but it looks like I was very wrong 

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, Tommy Fresh said:

Why does it? Daka doesn't seem wanted and seems likely to leave, so you think us signing Piroe means we'd then be comfortable enough to let Iheanacho go and be left with Piroe and Vardy?

Is Daka leaving then? Who cares who isn't wanted, its not the same as leaving and certainly not for us!  Only commenting on who seems to have traction (in the press admittedly)

 

[Cainy47]

Yeah but to counteract this , if we have the funds ,I would personally send Daka out on loan to get his confidence up , bring Piroe in , as we all know vards is in his last season , and hopefully kel will sign extension,Piroe ,and Daka are our future ,that would be ideal but just my opinion 🤔

[Tommy Fresh]

8 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Is Daka leaving then? Who cares who isn't wanted, its not the same as leaving and certainly not for us!  Only commenting on who seems to have traction (in the press admittedly)

 

So you can assume Iheanacho will go but I can't with Daka?

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, Tommy Fresh said:

So you can assume Iheanacho will go but I can't with Daka?

There has been links to Nacho

[K789]

Going leeds for 12 mill. Seems a good price 

[Tommy Fresh]

3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

There has been links to Nacho

There's been links to Daka

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, Tommy Fresh said:

There's been links to Daka

Monaco I think? Seems to have died down, but anyway - if Daka goes great, if Kel goes, less so, but we could need someone to go before adding Piroe I think

[Cainy47]

I have a real hunch ,he could be the new mitrovic in the right team ,hoping it's us 

[DezFox]

I would get rid of nacho for piroe. Proven to be more constant and less purple patchy, may want to be here more and not have 1 year left on contract. 

[st albans fox]

I know nowt but I doubt we’re very impressed with leeds after the Harrison january window incident 

 

wouldn’t shock me to see us attempt to gazump them late in the deal 

 

but I am not ITK 

[desertfox2]

23 minutes ago, K789 said:

Going leeds for 12 mill. Seems a good price 

If true that does seem a very good price for Piroe.

[Finnegan]

56 minutes ago, James_lcfc said:

Wasn't it the LL post in the previous Iheanacho thread that got it deleted?

 

I assumed he was a genuine ITK after that, but it looks like I was very wrong 

 

In response to my earlier cynicism, I've privately been reliably informed he's a "friend of a friend" of someone very senior in the club but the specific connection, if true, also explains his extremely anti-Rudkin dramatic bias. 

 

And I don't want to dox anyone but he should also probably be a bit more careful if true. 

 

(Not that I'm implying Jon Rudkin isn't a problem for the football club.)

 

Edited 24 August 2023 by Finnegan

[James_lcfc]

1 minute ago, Finnegan said:

 

In response to my earlier cynicism, I've privately been reliably informed he's a mutual friend of someone very senior in the club but the specific connection, if true, also explains his extremely anti-Rudkin dramatic bias. 

 

(Not that I'm implying Jon Rudkin isn't a problem for the football club.)

OK - That is interesting based on the content of some of his posts...

 

[Kinowe Soorie]

1 hour ago, lcfc sheff said:

Can we ban “ITKs” , I’m convinced it’s the same person making new accounts every window. Always seems to be a different person after the lack bloke gets found out for what I can tell just using Twitter rumours. 

The meltdowns about being “ITK”, is one of the best things during the transfer window being open. Just about on par, with an actual signing!!

[Buzzell]

31 minutes ago, K789 said:

Going leeds for 12 mill. Seems a good price 

If that is true then why the fvck aren’t we all over him. Absolute bargain for a player who knows the back of the net at this level.

[moore_94]

[kingpowerout]

Off to Leeds. EM not going to be happy 

Edited 24 August 2023 by kingpower