Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, TJQuik said:

It's not just the design, you naturally feel disgust looking at an item of clothing with a company like FBS plastered on it.

I agree, FBS is a dubious sponsor, but in addition the font used was horrible and out of keeping with the rest of the shirt.

 

A King Power "Thunderbirds" shirt for me!

  • Like 2
Posted

Must be only one what thinks our commercial director must be useless at his job - that we can’t attract at least another sponsor or be strong enough to say that’s keep it blank and then we will pick one up in a few weeks 

Posted
25 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Must be only one what thinks our commercial director must be useless at his job - that we can’t attract at least another sponsor or be strong enough to say that’s keep it blank and then we will pick one up in a few weeks 

What’s wrong with having King Power on the front and taking a cash injection from the parent company? I’d rather this than another crap sponsor.

Posted
24 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

What’s wrong with having King Power on the front and taking a cash injection from the parent company? I’d rather this than another crap sponsor.

I imagine what’s wrong with it is we’re now going to be getting far less money for advertising something on the front of our shirts

  • Like 2
Posted
58 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Must be only one what thinks our commercial director must be useless at his job - that we can’t attract at least another sponsor or be strong enough to say that’s keep it blank and then we will pick one up in a few weeks 

Alternatively, it’s a vehicle to direct extra funding into the club to maximise the ability to construct a promotable side.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Daggers said:

Alternatively, it’s a vehicle to direct extra funding into the club to maximise the ability to construct a promotable side.

Very likely 

Posted
39 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

What’s wrong with having King Power on the front and taking a cash injection from the parent company? I’d rather this than another crap sponsor.

 

6 minutes ago, Daggers said:

Alternatively, it’s a vehicle to direct extra funding into the club to maximise the ability to construct a promotable side.

If anything like last time they did it, it will be under the market value. Equally recent self-sponsorship rules implemented keep a watchful eye on it too. 

Posted

Makes me laugh when our club acts like shit how you get members on here say stuff like "well they made their money somehow" or "everyone exploits fans".

 

If you genuinely think that's a defence when things like this are exposed, i really do worry for you. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...