Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Yeah.

 

It's irony at its worst.

 

I guess some people need someone to hate, even if that's people who need someone to hate.

 

And yet I bet they don't have a scintilla of self-loathing.

Yep. Some folks are so far to the left,  they see anything approaching right as extreme and lose all self control & reason. 

  • Like 2
Posted

The sentiment is right but yeah getting your child to scream that is ill-advised and poor parenting.

 

Not to mention the fvcking spelling mistake of 'off'. That's a crime in itself!

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Robo61 said:

He has not be imprisoned for something he said on the internet though has he.

I've said LOADS of things on the internet, I reckon I must be looking at a spell inside of between 25,000 - 30,000 years by now if they ever catch up with me

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, urban.spaceman said:

Wasn’t he taking donations from his fans for his legal defence?

Yes, and when this was put to them a lot of them on Twitter said well watch the documentary then to learn the truth and do you know what I actually did and weirdly I did not feel like I did find out the truth by doing so even though he says the words "truth" "narrative" "journalism" and "agenda"  in it over and over again, before starting to go on about Asian grooming gangs as per bloody usual. In fairness to him if I'd stuck it out to the end perhaps I would have learned the truth, but it was a very difficult watch that I didn't have the stamina for but is probably an excellent documentary if you don't know what a documentary is or don't have any concept of what ordinarily constitutes journalism 

Posted
8 hours ago, StanSP said:

The sentiment is right but yeah getting your child to scream that is ill-advised and poor parenting.

 

Not to mention the fvcking spelling mistake of 'off'. That's a crime in itself!

The kid reaks of home schooled.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Otis said:

Yep. Some folks are so far to the left,  they see anything approaching right as extreme and lose all self control & reason. 

For the sake of balance, the same can be said of the right.

Edited by Trav Le Bleu
Posted

So according to a BBC report, Vietnam is now the country that has the  most people coming over by small boat into the UK across the channel.

 

 

thats a bit random!

Posted
27 minutes ago, MPH said:

So according to a BBC report, Vietnam is now the country that has the  most people coming over by small boat into the UK across the channel.

 

 

thats a bit random!

It's the 70s all over again.

Posted
16 hours ago, StanSP said:

The sentiment is right but yeah getting your child to scream that is ill-advised and poor parenting.

 

Not to mention the fvcking spelling mistake of 'off'. That's a crime in itself!

I think the second F is in yellow and not showing up well.

Guest TamworthFoxes
Posted

So the Southport Murderer has now been charged with Terrorism Offences.

 

Its almost as if the Public were purposely fed the Mental Health,  troubled child narrative rather than the Terrorist Asylum seeker version of events.

Who would have thought it?  Shocked I tell you.

Posted
Just now, TamworthFoxes said:

So the Southport Murderer has now been charged with Terrorism Offences.

 

Its almost as if the Public were purposely fed the Mental Health,  troubled child narrative rather than the Terrorist Asylum seeker version of events.

Who would have thought it?  Shocked I tell you.

I remember all the "stop spreading disinformation he's CHRISTIAN" type posts on social media when it happened. 

Posted

How much stuff is going to get more expensive now that the minimum wage has gone up then? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, TamworthFoxes said:

So the Southport Murderer has now been charged with Terrorism Offences.

 

Its almost as if the Public were purposely fed the Mental Health,  troubled child narrative rather than the Terrorist Asylum seeker version of events.

Who would have thought it?  Shocked I tell you.

... and who would have thought a reasoned response to the incident was to take out the anger on any random face of a different skin colour (because they're all dangerous apparently) and seek to burn down where they live?

 

Also shocking.

  • Like 2
Posted

Looks like tomorrow one thing I can get on board with is the expansion of the carers allowance to allow people to earn £180 a week rather than £150 currently before you lose carers allowance status. Still a pittance but it’s a step in the right direction. 
 

Be interesting to see the markets reaction to the rest of it, the $ has been trending over 1.30 for the last quarter so I’m keen to see what happens there. 

  • Like 1
Guest TamworthFoxes
Posted
2 minutes ago, bovril said:

I remember all the "stop spreading disinformation he's CHRISTIAN" type posts on social media when it happened. 

Just a mentally ill little Welsh school boy.  I even remember the picture the Press released of him looking about 11 years old in his school uniform.

 

Good job they have jailed all the people who put out a slightly different version of events.

 

Next it will be "just because he has Terrorist material doesn't mean the attack was Terrorism."

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sly said:

How much stuff is going to get more expensive now that the minimum wage has gone up then? 

Probably not - it will just mean people in the 18-21 age bracket will have more disposable income than middle earners (not in absolute terms just pre and post budget)  We’ll get a rate cut on Nov 7th, I’d be shocked if not. Hopeful 

Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

If the information wasn't known at the time, then why would it come to that conclusion? Based on presumption?

 

Was it known at the time that he produced ricin and was in possession of Al-Qaeda manuals?

 

I imagine it was known pretty early on to a great number of people. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

If the information wasn't known at the time, then why would it come to that conclusion? Based on presumption?

 

Was it known at the time that he produced ricin and was in possession of Al-Qaeda manuals?

 

Does it make the response of all those that rioted and threatened in the immediate aftermath correct? Was it worth threatening innocent people and families in hotels just because they're of the same skin colour? I very much doubt it...

To be fair the riot bit - he didn’t make a comment on, you just added that bit. Anyone with a sane mind would disagree with violence towards people (Asylum seekers) or police. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

... and who would have thought a reasoned response to the incident was to take out the anger on any random face of a different skin colour (because they're all dangerous apparently) and seek to burn down where they live?

 

Also shocking.

Yeh it is but that wasn’t the point he’s making?

Posted
1 minute ago, Tommy G said:

To be fair the riot bit - he didn’t make a comment on, you just added that bit. Anyone with a sane mind would disagree with violence towards people (Asylum seekers) or police. 

Granted.

 

Still linked, I'd say...

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Tommy G said:

Probably not - it will just mean people in the 18-21 age bracket will have more disposable income than middle earners (not in absolute terms just pre and post budget)  We’ll get a rate cut on Nov 7th, I’d be shocked if not. Hopeful 

I’d imagine it will have more of an impact as you go further north, due to the difference in wages etc. 

Edited by Sly
Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

Granted.

 

Still linked, I'd say...

I think the point he’s making is these sort of details would have been known pretty quickly but the narrative released was different….until today. 
 

I don’t think he said the rioting was justified 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Sly said:

I’d imagine it will have more of an impact as you go further north, do to the difference in wages etc. 

A bag of crisps in London and a 3 bed semi in Middlesbrough probably. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Yeh it is but that wasn’t the point he’s making?

It was rather conspicuous by its absence.

 

Apparently those involved just had a "slightly different version of events".

Edited by leicsmac
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...