Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Fox42 said:

Osmajic is the type of player that we historically struggle to deal with. Need to be able to contain him.

Possibly why Okoli's physicality has put him in ahead of Faes.

 

Although he still needs to perform..

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fox42 said:

Osmajic is the type of player that we historically struggle to deal with. Need to be able to contain him.

My thoughts as well, can see him scoring 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Why are people still moaning cos Soumare starts?

Alternatives are Skipp or Page, one is just as bad, one needs easing in.  :dunno:

 

Full expect that to change before the window closes thankfully.

Doesn’t matter who the alternatives are, Soumare shouldn’t even be under consideration 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Skid_1884 said:

Doesn’t matter who the alternatives are, Soumare shouldn’t even be under consideration 

What a stupid comment

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Skid_1884 said:

So you think he deserves to be considered then? That’s stupid 

So you are happy for Skipp or Hamza to play there? Back at you  lol

 

All three are dreadful, we need new.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Dahnsouff said:

So you are happy for Skipp or Hamza to play there? Back at you  lol

 

All three are dreadful, we need new.

I would rather have Hamza there to be honest at least he puts a tackle in.

 

Maybe we could try a different formation instead of 4231 that every manager we have seems insistent on.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, jimmer said:

Bar the young lad Monga... our bench is disgusting 

What's wrong with it?

Posted

At the minute... I'm more for points on the board than performances ... we need to rack up some points for the incoming PSR if required... or if not we can then push on ... We must give Marti our full support regardless of his selection... because Top, Rudkin and the rest of the muppets are unlikely to stand shoulder to shoulder with him 

Posted
1 minute ago, Skid_1884 said:

I would rather have Hamza there to be honest at least he puts a tackle in.

 

Maybe we could try a different formation instead of 4231 that every manager we have seems insistent on.

Know what you mean about the formation, I realise 4231 is the "in vogue" formation right now, but come on....

Posted
43 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

Exactly. I'd personally be going with Winks and Hamza at this point, but that would cause a few aneurysms on here as well. 

 

Fact is we're really short on reliable options in the centre of the park.

If Brownhill comes in, then I imagine we see him, Winks and Page rotate. Soumare and Skipp are utterly honking. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

So you are happy for Skipp or Hamza to play there? Back at you  lol

 

All three are dreadful, we need new.

No one is disagreeing in terms of needing someone else and that all 3 are pants.

 

BUT as a two Winks should be alongside either Skipp or Hamza.

 

Booby offers very little, he isn’t particularly good on the ball, he’s an average passer at best..he’s slow and has a poor work rate. Hes also not a ball-winner.

 

Skipp and Hamza have high work rates and can win the ball, ideal for playing ALONGSIDE Winks. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...