JimJams Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 1 minute ago, StanSP said: He doesn't score or even play much in their youth teams... That's because he's been on the bench for the senior team for a decent number of games. 4
Lambert09 Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 2 minutes ago, Lambert09 said: Anyone know much about this lad? If he’s picked up a few mins for man city he must be a pretty good prospect. just happy something is happening A bit of online research and a few city fans disappointed he’s leaving as he would pick up minutes for them. So we might have done very well here 1
Walshy5 Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 19 minutes ago, when_you're_smiling said: Attacking midfielder apparently, which might mean James is out for longer than we think. He is. Andy King said longer than March for a return. 1
South Shire Fox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 26 minutes ago, DZ-LCFC said: They are brave allowing one of their players to join our shit show at the moment
moore_94 Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Played upfront against Huddersfield and Brentford in the Carabao and against Exeter in the FA cup 3
Silverfox14 Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Not seen him play but seems has a good pedigree so far. Is obviously not highly experienced in first team terms but positive to see some additions. Welcome to Divine….hope you make a name for yourself here.
Ryy Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Very good player and another body but the inexperience is abit of a worry in a relegation battle
Sunbury Fox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Not the kind of player we need in a Championship relegation battle.
Sunbury Fox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 32 minutes ago, TheGoldenGod said: Don't know how many times it needs to be said but we need to bin off Ramsay..we're in no position to carry players that are never available when we can use that loan spot. The previous manager wanted to keep him and he's no longer here. Be ruthless!!!! I'm assuming the clowns running the club didn't include a clause allowing us to send him back or they've agreed that he can only be sent back with Burnley's agreement
BrilliantFox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January (edited) He's literally only played 25 minutes of Premier League football. Rubbish transfer yet again from Rudkin and Co. Edited 31 January by BrilliantFox 1
JimJams Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 4 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said: He's literally only played 25 minutes of Premier League football. Rubbish transfer yet again from Rudkin and Co. 100% agree. We should only be taking Man City players who regularly play in their first 11. 1 3
fox_favourite Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Just now, JimJams said: 100% agree. We should only be taking Man City players who regularly play in their first 11. Minimum!
BrilliantFox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Just now, JimJams said: 100% agree. We should only be taking Man City players who regularly play in their first 11. Difference between 25 minutes and being a regular starter, lets not be dumb here.
fox_favourite Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 2 minutes ago, Ryy said: If he has any brain cells he says no Well that is that transfer stopped then.
JimJams Posted 31 January Posted 31 January (edited) 2 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said: Difference between 25 minutes and being a regular starter, lets not be dumb here. And there's a massive difference between Man City and ourselves. Let's not be dumb here. Edited 31 January by JimJams 1
LCFCJohn Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 5 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said: Difference between 25 minutes and being a regular starter, lets not be dumb here. He’s an 18 year old kid and it’s Man City It’s one thing, as others have said above, to wonder whether he can make an impact in a toxic environment and relegation battle. But let’s not pretend he’s not good enough for us because he isn’t a regular starter for Man City…. Swear you think we are a regular European club or something!
BrilliantFox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 4 minutes ago, JimJams said: And there's a massive difference between Man City and ourselves. Let's not be dumb here. 1 minute ago, LCFCJohn said: He’s an 18 year old kid and it’s Man City It’s one thing, as others have said above, to wonder whether he can make an impact in a toxic environment and relegation battle. But let’s not pretend he’s not good enough for us because he isn’t a regular starter for Man City…. I understand both your points. But I just don't see how he's going to help us. As seen with our current Attacking Midfielder Louis Page, too raw too inexperienced to make a difference.
JimJams Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Just now, BrilliantFox said: I understand both your points. But I just don't see how he's going to help us. As seen with our current Attacking Midfielder Louis Page, too raw too inexperienced to make a difference. You could be right, but it's beggars and choosers and all that. We need bodies, ain't spending, we're going to have to hope we can strike gold with our loans.
LCFCJohn Posted 31 January Posted 31 January 8 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said: I understand both your points. But I just don't see how he's going to help us. As seen with our current Attacking Midfielder Louis Page, too raw too inexperienced to make a difference. Like I said, whether he can contribute given the circumstances and his experience is questionable. Certainly this type of loan is more suited to a club operating further up the league, not a relegation battle. But we aren’t going to bring anybody who is a regular starter for Man City!
UniFox21 Posted 31 January Posted 31 January We don't need talented teenagers, we need some championship hardened bastards 2
brookfox Posted 31 January Posted 31 January Never heard of him, not seen him play, haven’t watched any YouTube videos. But after today I’d bet my house on him already being our best player!
Recommended Posts