Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

I think its a bit early to be sure what he is in senior man football.

The spirit of Kelechi lives on...

  • Haha 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Lillehamring said:

You initially only mention the positions of Page and Souttar (let's forget about souttar), but if you want to expand it....

 

page's primary position is a 6, who can play 8 - given that page is probably behind braybrooke, chaplin, cullen and reid to play one of the 8/10 spots and, as discussed elsewhere, has alternate options at 6,  i don't see his sale from a numbers point of view as such a crisis.

It would still leave us with at least 2 players in each of the 3 midfield spots (plus neale has played 6 and 8 in preseason, and Alves can play as an 8).  I think you're worrying unnecessarily about this.

Page is absolutely not a 6.

 

He is an 8. That his is main position and someone that could probably do a job as a 10.

 

We play with two main midfield spots outside of the number 10 role for which we're well stacked.

 

The only players that can play as either a 6 or an 8 are Skipp, Braybrooke, Page, Neale and Choudhury.

 

There is no scenario where Chaplin, Cullen or Reid could play as a 6 or 8. Sorry but anyone claiming they could is as thick as mince.

 

We have 4 players who could realistically play in the number 6 or 8 role if (when) Page leaves and they are Skipp, Braybooke, Neale and Choudhury. If you think we're fine for midfielders but short for strikers then, sorry, but you are stupid.

Posted
4 hours ago, AKCJ said:

There is no scenario where Chaplin, Cullen or Reid could play as a 6 or 8. Sorry but anyone claiming they could is as thick as mince.

 

Whilst on face value this is correct, Chaplin by his own admission, in an interview, stated that he's being asked to play in a different position to what he is used to by Martin and that he is adapting to that role. What position do you suggest this is?

Posted
6 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Page is absolutely not a 6.

 

He is an 8. That his is main position and someone that could probably do a job as a 10.

 

We play with two main midfield spots outside of the number 10 role for which we're well stacked.

 

The only players that can play as either a 6 or an 8 are Skipp, Braybrooke, Page, Neale and Choudhury.

 

There is no scenario where Chaplin, Cullen or Reid could play as a 6 or 8. Sorry but anyone claiming they could is as thick as mince.

 

We have 4 players who could realistically play in the number 6 or 8 role if (when) Page leaves and they are Skipp, Braybooke, Neale and Choudhury. If you think we're fine for midfielders but short for strikers then, sorry, but you are stupid.

I think long term as he grows and fills out he could be that player who can play both as an 6 or an 8.

 

He's going to be a very different player at 25 than he is at 18.

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Page is absolutely not a 6.

 

He is an 8. That his is main position and someone that could probably do a job as a 10.

 

We play with two main midfield spots outside of the number 10 role for which we're well stacked.

 

The only players that can play as either a 6 or an 8 are Skipp, Braybrooke, Page, Neale and Choudhury.

 

There is no scenario where Chaplin, Cullen or Reid could play as a 6 or 8. Sorry but anyone claiming they could is as thick as mince.

 

We have 4 players who could realistically play in the number 6 or 8 role if (when) Page leaves and they are Skipp, Braybooke, Neale and Choudhury. If you think we're fine for midfielders but short for strikers then, sorry, but you are stupid.

we are playing essentially a 4-1-4-1 formation with masses of flexibility.

of that attacking four the middle, call them what you will - 8 or 10 AM, CAM - we know page can play there, we know we are well stocked there, we are not light there, we are not short there, we are definitely not 'horrendously short' there.  The deeper midfielder (6, DM - whatever) - we know page can play there, again, we not short in this position.

I would hate to see page go but from both a numbers and talent point of view if he did it is the one area of the team where we are actually more than well-stocked.  Your original point was that if page went we would be horrendously short -  and i say again, this is wrong.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

we are playing essentially a 4-1-4-1 formation with masses of flexibility.

of that attacking four the middle, call them what you will - 8 or 10 AM, CAM - we know page can play there, we know we are well stocked there, we are not light there, we are not short there, we are definitely not 'horrendously short' there.  The deeper midfielder (6, DM - whatever) - we know page can play there, again, we not short in this position.

I would hate to see page go but from both a numbers and talent point of view if he did it is the one area of the team where we are actually more than well-stocked.  Your original point was that if page went we would be horrendously short -  and i say again, this is wrong.

EDIT:  I may be stupid - but it's pretty standard policy that in a 25 man squad, you have two players for each position - we easily have that, so, stupid, or not, me and, apparently, the manager are happy with that.  Panicking because we only have 4 players who can play DM is absurd.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Page is absolutely not a 6.

 

He is an 8. That his is main position and someone that could probably do a job as a 10.

 

We play with two main midfield spots outside of the number 10 role for which we're well stacked.

 

The only players that can play as either a 6 or an 8 are Skipp, Braybrooke, Page, Neale and Choudhury.

 

There is no scenario where Chaplin, Cullen or Reid could play as a 6 or 8. Sorry but anyone claiming they could is as thick as mince.

 

We have 4 players who could realistically play in the number 6 or 8 role if (when) Page leaves and they are Skipp, Braybooke, Neale and Choudhury. If you think we're fine for midfielders but short for strikers then, sorry, but you are stupid.

I am probably wrong, but I have always thought of us playing with a 6, 8 and 10. Skipp and Choudhury at 6, Braybrooke and Page at 8 and Chaplin, Cullen and BDCR at 10.

 

Given what many on the forum are saying about how poor this league is then Mayer could play Braybrooke as a deep lying playmaker rather than Skipp as a DM.

Posted
On 14/08/2026 at 11:20, AKCJ said:

Nobody is desperate to sign Faes or Mavididi mate lol 

Still confident Mavididi isn't being sold, not in the match day squad?

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Still confident Mavididi isn't being sold, not in the match day squad?

Did you have insider info or something? lol

 

Absolutely staggered that there is any sort of interest in him. Was convinced he'd be here for the rest of his big contract.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Did you have insider info or something? lol

 

Absolutely staggered that there is any sort of interest in him. Was convinced he'd be here for the rest of his big contract.

I'd imagine the winger that Rangers wanting to sign falling through would accelerate interest to get Stephy. Speculation of course but would make sense!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...