city1993 Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 Yh maybe, but I would rather have carl cort, he's about the same sort of player but proved at this level, if we want to go up, we need tried and tested players not throw-em-in-and-see players !!
MPH Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 Billy Sharp would cost around 2mil but he be less risky compared with izale mcleod even though he'l cost more. what do the rest of u think agreed. if they are considering paying 1.5 for izale, why not pay an extra 500k and get someone like sharp? This isnt against the MK dons, but any young player coming out of Crewe, i trust 100%..
uncle_connolly Posted 31 May 2007 Author Posted 31 May 2007 How come I started this thread when I actually didnt??
Brainy Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 How come I started this thread when I actually didnt?? Its probably because you posted something in a different thread, and it deserves a thread of its own, if you know what i mean.
dandannieldanok Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 How come I started this thread when I actually didnt?? It's a good thing, makes you look like you have started something worthwhile and important, just look at the thread in sticky part of this subforum, I have a topic with 13 pages I didn't realise starting.
lookwhaticando Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 Its probably because you posted something in a different thread, and it deserves a thread of its own, if you know what i mean. Give this man a biscuit! I split the McLeod discussion from earlier today out of the MK Dons topic when this rumour surfaced by itself - because it is now an actual rumour, rather than just a "we should/we might go for _____" type discussion. "Rumours" such as this deserve topics of their own. Opinions and suggestions belong in existing topics.
Father Ted Posted 31 May 2007 Posted 31 May 2007 I saw this in the gossip column from the newspapers on teletext this morning.
uncle_connolly Posted 1 June 2007 Author Posted 1 June 2007 Give this man a biscuit! I split the McLeod discussion from earlier today out of the MK Dons topic when this rumour surfaced by itself - because it is now an actual rumour, rather than just a "we should/we might go for _____" type discussion. "Rumours" such as this deserve topics of their own. Opinions and suggestions belong in existing topics. Oh ok thanks for the confirmation mate
Ozwin Posted 1 June 2007 Posted 1 June 2007 But it'd be nice none the less...>_> Oi, you editted your post.
London_Fox Posted 1 June 2007 Posted 1 June 2007 I personally think fryatt will be on fire next season anyway, lets all remember he was pretty leathal in his first campaign and was never fit due to niggly ankle injury last term. When fit he has already proven he's more then capable at this level Shhh...you'll wake Thracian with that sort of talk about Fryatt, he's no Elvis you know
joely22 Posted 1 June 2007 Posted 1 June 2007 We get a percentage of whatever the fee may be. I think it's 20/25% am not sure. All I remember from him is that hes lightning. Couldn't score to save his life. Saying that, it was a few years back now and his goalscoring record is pretty decent. £1.5 million does seem a bit steep though.
Father Ted Posted 1 June 2007 Posted 1 June 2007 WASTE OF MONEY! AND BY THE LOOKS OF IT, HES A LAZY S*IT
Thracian Posted 1 June 2007 Posted 1 June 2007 Shhh...you'll wake Thracian with that sort of talk about Fryatt, he's no Elvis you know I'm listening!!!!
Neil982 Posted 2 June 2007 Posted 2 June 2007 Well, all I know is he's the dogs b***ocks in LMA manager :-) From what i've read about the real life player as well though, I think he'd be worth a try!
milan_foxes Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 I wouldnt mind him coming here - he looks pretty good, albeit at League Two level... He has got everything we need like speed, power and energetic!
Fez of Mahrez Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 I dunno. A lot of those goals are down to slow League Two centre-backs being outwitted by a simple through-ball. 1) The defending in our league is a million times better. 2) We don't have any midfielders capable of those sort of through balls anyway (yet ) -- If he has a decent touch and can hold the ball up as well, I'd be more inclined to take him. I haven't seen him very often so can't really comment but I still think £1.5million is a bit steep. I'd be looking at paying around £800,000 with add-ons.
teblin Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 That would have been over in about 20 secs with some strikers we currently have.
Webbo Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 TBH I'd heard of him before but never seen him. Looks good, but then again this time last year so did Josh Low.
Hullfox Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 Anyone else here the kid calling Tranmere's goalkeeper an idiot as he's rounded for the second goal?
Mort Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 If he has a decent touch and can hold the ball up as well, I'd be more inclined to take him. I haven't seen him very often so can't really comment but I still think £1.5million is a bit steep. I'd be looking at paying around £800,000 with add-ons. It’s not “a bit steepâ€â€¦ it’s a bloody joke! His record (54 goals in 116 starts with MK Dons) is actually not all that different to Fryatt’s (70 starts & 27 goals) before joining city, now Fryatt set us back £100k why then should we look to be spending over 10x(!) that sum on a player who if marginally better is also older!? It’s absolutely barmy! We do not have this money to waste; at best I’d rate McLeod as commanding an up front fee in the region of £300k (perhaps with add-ons pushing it closer to £500k)… but £1.5mil is a huge amount of money to spend on “Fryatt MkIIâ€, when we could spend a similar fee to bring in proven quality up front (Eastwood being the name that springs to mind).
Head Honcho Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 This guy, if we sign him, will end up getting more stick than AA did! Money could be better spent elsewhere imo.
brookfox Posted 3 June 2007 Posted 3 June 2007 I don't want to sound like Little watching the Savo Milosevic tape, but based on that, where do we sign?! Plus he's bigger than I thought he was and seemed to score a few headers, anyone know how tall he is?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.