S1DDO Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Although he was out of position i thought played well, definatley no worse than anyone else, ok, he tired in the second half as the all did. His passing was ok and kept possesion well at times, might have been more effective on the right as he had to keep cutting in to cross.
Manwell Pablo Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Although he was out of position i thought played well, definatley no worse than anyone else, ok, he tired in the second halfas the all did. His passing was ok and kept possesion well at times, might have been more effective on the right as he had to keep cutting in to cross. Well I didn't go. But Hume would of been the better choice out of the starting XI and Porter out of the squad.
Wils Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Well I didn't go.But Hume would of been the better choice out of the starting XI and Porter out of the squad. Definatly. Fryatt isnt a midfeilder.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I don't think he's got any attributes to play there whatsoever. To tell the truth I'm still trying to work out what his attributes are though.
Babylon Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I'm still trying to work out what his attributes are though. How dare you.... he'd score 30 a season if we created chances, he wasn't injured and he wasn't actually shit.
Zingari Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 i think we should employ a squad rotation system ; not just the players , the positions as well
Raj Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 i think we should employ a squad rotation system ; not just the players , the positions as well I think Porter would be great in goal. FACT
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 i think we should employ a squad rotation system ; not just the players , the positions as well Electric, gas, or pig shit powered?
Ric Flair Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I liken Fryatt's appearance on the left wing as the same as when O'Neill decided to pl,ay Heskey at left back against Ipswich in the League Cup years ago. It amazes me that managers try things like this. I quite like to see three strikers playing in the startin XI but if you're going to have one play out wide then make sure they've got the attributes to play there. Fryatt is a poacher, likes to hang about the box, not mix it up in his own half on the left. Weird.
Blue Bob Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I dont believe in playing players out of position, you are only going to get a second rate performance from them - not from a point of effort but from ability, they have worked at being a forward not a winger. His natural desire would mean he wants to shoot more than create. From the Radio it seemed like he was shooting from distance all the time (for those who went sorry I am relying on the words of a Sheep). Barber also said that he thought that Fryatt had grown a couple of inches - can anyone confirm this??? I thought he was 5. 11" so that would make him over 6 foot. Or was this just Barber being a pr*ck!!
adam Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I think we should stick to playing midfielders in midfield. Its for the best.
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 I dont believe in playing players out of position, you are only going to get a second rate performance from them - not from a point of effort but from ability, they have worked at being a forward not a winger. His natural desire would mean he wants to shoot more than create. From the Radio it seemed like he was shooting from distance all the time (for those who went sorry I am relying on the words of a Sheep).Barber also said that he thought that Fryatt had grown a couple of inches - can anyone confirm this??? I thought he was 5. 11" so that would make him over 6 foot. Or was this just Barber being a pr*ck!! Is it common for a grown man to suddenly grow 2 inches in height!!!, Barber was probably staring at his own cock, got a hard-on for the first time and left the transmission on
adam Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 BLUE BOB, no one shot from distance. In the 2nd half im sure we were trying to walk it in.
DB11 Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 As people have said, surely Hume is the more obvious choice for a midfielder than Fryatt?
adam Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 As people have said, surely Hume is the more obvious choice for a midfielder than Fryatt? Hume was the leading scorer last year. Id play him up front every time.
Simi Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Fryatt did ok, considering he was wide. Not the most obvious choice in my opinion! He had a couple of good touches but never beat his man, which is crucial when you play wide. He probably could of bagged in the second half, but missed his chance.
Flynny Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Fryatt did ok, considering he was wide. It's like last season all over again.
Milky Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 What the hell is Allen playing at. This is ridiculas.
Babylon Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 What the hell is Allen playing at. This is ridiculas.
lildave3 Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Odd choice, one that didn't come off imo. He didn't do too badly out there, but there is times when he needs to look up and release the ball instead of shooting/running with it.
filbertway Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Fryatt is blatently not a winger, he didn't know what to do when he got himself into the good positions. He's a scorer not a creator, Hume should have been left wing and fryatt up front.
Ric Flair Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Fryatt is blatently not a winger, he didn't know what to do when he got himself into the good positions.He's a scorer not a creator, Hume should have been left wing and fryatt up front. He's very greedy at the minute. There were a few occasions where he tried to go it alone where a pass or even a shot from himself would have been more effective. But, instead he decided to try and take umpteen players on and then wasted possesion. Hume also does this regularly, it's infuriating at times.
demon_dog Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 He's very greedy at the minute. There were a few occasions where he tried to go it alone where a pass or even a shot from himself would have been more effective. But, instead he decided to try and take umpteen players on and then wasted possesion. Hume also does this regularly, it's infuriating at times. Could it be he has no confidence in those around him.
Thracian Posted 15 August 2007 Posted 15 August 2007 Could it be he has no confidence in those around him. I'd suggest it's part of the fear thing that's suffocating the club. Everyone's looking to themselves because if they don't score they'll be replaced. Remarkably DeVries is the only one who really seems to be playing selflessly and he's arguably doing best of all. Odhimabo too but he only gets minor cameos.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.