Fez of Mahrez Posted 3 January 2008 Posted 3 January 2008 Right I'm going to bed. Vincent Pericard is on Facebook. By the time I get to work tomorrow, someone will have messaged him and told him not to bother. Thank you in advance. Love, Fez
Dames Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 More wasted money that could have gone on Marton Fulop. If this is true my faith in the club will all but vanish. The problems are glaring them in the face and have been for years and still people at the club continue to look past them.
Thracian Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Believe me, Babylon has his links. He told us first about Kaebi He might be reliable but he never gives us any good news!
Bryn Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 I've heard this as well, though I've not heard about a medical, I heard he had a trial. I. DO NOT. WANT HIM.
Alexikokopops Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 I've heard this as well, though I've not heard about a medical, I heard he had a trial.I. DO NOT. WANT HIM. I think my current avatar/text combination sums up how I feel.
WetFlannel Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 I think my current avatar/text combination sums up how I feel. Once again displaying your paint skills... Are you aware you can do text boxes to make it look neater
Alexikokopops Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Once again displaying your paint skills... Are you aware you can do text boxes to make it look neater Yes, but having a white box with "fook off" in doesn't quite have the same effect as writing it all over Pericard's face. Plus the text box just makes it look ridiculously tacky, I'm embracing Paint's crapness.
barmy76uk Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Pericard was on suicide watch at Pompey a few years back,we really don't need him,but Holloway basically said our forwards are all useless,so i can see Hume and Fryatt leaving in the next week or so! He praised Hayles and Howard and basically said the rest of the team are no good! If this is a manager trying to put confidence in a team,he hasn't got a clue! Holloway out!
James. Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 What the f**k is going on. Why are we still buying c**ting strikers. And shit ones at that. I'm confused.
teblin Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Bit like trev with dreads and can see. Played 29 times for Cameroon. Big and strong, but poor first touch. Only makes sense if we are selling fryatt and hume and signing 2 wingers to get crosses in to big men.
eaststandtom Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Bit like trev with dreads and can see.Played 29 times for Cameroon. Big and strong, but poor first touch. Only makes sense if we are selling fryatt and hume and signing 2 wingers to get crosses in to big men. at least trev made a nuisance of himself. put himself about more than our current lot. we need to be big, mean and physical which neither fryatt nor hume or campbell are
reynard Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 This makes sense if anyone cares to remember the type of football played by QPR when Holloway was their manager. if he signs we wont need a midfield and Mccauley and Kisnorbo's aimless long hoofs may come more and more into play. Something to look forward to then!
dpjfox Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 Surely cant be true, hope the Alnwick rumour is though
Rocky Dennis Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 IF this is true, I am very worried! We should be looking at a higher standard of player than this, this kinda reminds me of Allens transfer policy!
eaststandtom Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 This makes sense if anyone cares to remember the type of football played by QPR when Holloway was their manager. if he signs we wont need a midfield and Mccauley and Kisnorbo's aimless long hoofs may come more and more into play.Something to look forward to then! holloways teams have always been able to play but have had the steel in them too to play like that when is neccersary which is often in this division. we need that ask most plymouth fans besides we have played nothing but longball since relegation year with taylor. maybe those aimless hoofs will benefit us more with howard, hayles etc making a nuisance of themselevs
Babylon Posted 4 January 2008 Author Posted 4 January 2008 It's not all doom and gloom... remember the Morfaw guy, he had a medical before he had a trial. So with someone saying they heard pericard was having a trial it could be just that!!!! We could tell him to do one after it like Morfaw!!!!! PRAYS!!!!!
Ric Flair Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 This is just bizarre. Why? Why would we need yet another striker?
Babylon Posted 4 January 2008 Author Posted 4 January 2008 So he was one of the Trialists I would think he's a new trialist as he had the medical yesterday.... or he could be signing long term. We are just guessing at the moment why he had a medical for us.
Ric Flair Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 So he was one of the Trialists It doesn't make sense why we'd sign him unless Hume or Fryatt are leaving, even then you'd have to question why on earth we'd want Vince. The longer Holloway is in charge the more scared I am getting. But I commend his signing of Howard, so I could perhaps let him off with Pericard if we get some quality midfielders in.
newtonfox Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 I would think he's a new trialist as he had the medical yesterday.... or he could be signing long term. We are just guessing at the moment why he had a medical for us. carnt get one anywhere else
Fez of Mahrez Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 It doesn't make sense why we'd sign him unless Hume or Fryatt are leaving, even then you'd have to question why on earth we'd want Vince.The longer Holloway is in charge the more scared I am getting. But I commend his signing of Howard, so I could perhaps let him off with Pericard if we get some quality midfielders in. And Hayles. It's ridiculous. "Okay, that's three strikers signed but it's still alright as long as we sign some midfielders" - I'm sick of all this. What's the point?
Ric Flair Posted 4 January 2008 Posted 4 January 2008 I would think he's a new trialist as he had the medical yesterday.... or he could be signing long term. We are just guessing at the moment why he had a medical for us. Stoke haven't released him though have they? So why would we have him in on trial, when Holloway has worked with him before at Plymouth IIRC? If he's had a medical, it probably means he's fookin agreed terms and all sorts. This is bad.
Babylon Posted 4 January 2008 Author Posted 4 January 2008 carnt get one anywhere else Well nobody else probably wants him, so yes.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.