Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
mmarkie

Team for Birmingham game

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting that no one has selected Morrison at CB?

Posted

1. Paul Henderson

2. James Chambers

3. Joe Mattock

4. Jack Hobbs

5. Sasho Tunchev

6. Matt Oakley ©

7. Radostin Kishishev

8. Nicky Adams

9. Steve Howard

10. Matt Fryatt

11. Lloyd Dyer

Posted
Interesting that no one has selected Morrison at CB?

I suspect because all reports before Fez's excellent post had suggested his isn't ready yet. I too have not managed a pre-season game. What appears to be true is most of the established players appear keen and hungry with the new additions giving us some new options. I'm hopeful a rebuild is beginning with a diverse set of options. Just hope Pearson gets the blend right.

Posted

After this pre season I'm really not sure what our starting line up should be and I suspect pearson doesn't know for sure either.

Personally I think we have to start (injuries permitting) the games vs Bham and palace with the team which will play vs MKDons. The time for experiments is over. The two centre halves are key positions and it is vital they pair get the chance to play together as mch as possible whover they are.

The same applies to the strikers. These two pairs need to bulid up an understanding on the pitch and from what I can see we simply don't have this yet.

There don't seem to be many certs except probably henderson in goal and on present form Adams surely has to start.

mattock is the only option at left back for me.

My main area of concern is at centre half. With Kisnorbo out and N'gotty seemingly past it we have potentially a really good young pair or potentially an inexperienced and potentially goal conceding young pair. The reports on Morrison sugest he's going to be the one to miss out.

Posted

GK - Paul Henderson

DL- Joe Mattock

DR - Kerrea Gilbert

DC - Michael Morrison

DC - Jack Hobbs

ML - Nicky Adams

MR - Max Gradel

MC - Matt Oakley ©

MC - James Wesolowski

FW - Matty Fryatt

FW - Stevie Howard

Bench - Logan, JChambers, Kishishev, King, AChambers, DJ Campbell, Hayles, Worley, Tunchev, Dyer, Porter, Sappleton

Not put Tunchev in , because ive not seem him play, its like last year when Kaebi was getting in peoples sides and they had not even seen him play!

Posted

Hendo

Chambers

Morrison,Tunchev

Hobbs

Mattock

Adams / Gradel for last 20ish minutes

Wesowloski

Oakley ©

Dyer i didnt think he was to good yesterday either

Fryatt

Campbell,Hayles

Posted
Based on the pre-season games so far what does everyone think the team will be for Birmingham?

I only went to the Quorn game but from what everyone has said i think it should be:

GK:Henderson

RB:Gilbert

CB:Hobbs

CB:Tunchev

LB:Mattock

RM:Adams

CM:Oakley©

CM:Wesolowski

LM:Dyer

ST:Fryatt

ST:Campbell

I definately think that Henderson should start in goal.

Gilberts the obvious choice at right-back.

Hobbs another obvious choice at the back.

Tunchev should get his chance i think.

Mattock is basically the only choice we've got.

Adams at right mid seems to work well with Gilbert down the right.

Oakley and Wesolowski for me in the middle Oakley can pass very well and Wesolowski can break up the play well.

Dyer is an obvious choice for me on the left wing

Fryatt and Campbell as they seem to be the only strikers interested.

I think Gradel should come on with 20 minutes to go and get behind the tired defences and score some goals.

Your Thoughts?

I would go with this team against Birmingham and M.k although it would be nice to find a place for Gradel

That was the first time I had seen him on Saturday and he reminds me of Shaun Wright Phillips

Posted
I would go with this team against Birmingham and M.k although it would be nice to find a place for Gradel

That was the first time I had seen him on Saturday and he reminds me of Shaun Wright Phillips

Wouldn't he be better coming off the bench and getting at the tired defences?

Posted
Interesting that no one has selected Morrison at CB?

I didn't think he was that bad .Maybe he's been built up a bit and people were expecting too much from him. He's still

a young player and I think he will turn out to be a good signing given time.

Posted
I think the best strike partnership is Fryatt and DJ.

I honestly don't know if that's the case - there's no question Howard would score goals at this level - but I would like to find out abou Campbell/Fryatt in a meaningful game.

To me our strength now is skill, pace and passing and there seems no reason not to play to it. I'm not against powerhouse centre-forwards but could you imagine Gradel putting in a deep (too deep as it happened) cross and Shearer not being anywhere to be seen.

That's what happened at Kettering and when he played the crosses shorter there was still no-one attacking the near post.

Are the coaches even working on it? I've seen no evidence but if we really are going to get the best out of what are definitely proper wingers by Diision One standards, it's elementary to have both front and far post targets. Not two empty spaces.

Ideally you'd have a ghost runner coming in too like Adams (for his header) or King. But Kingy's starting to bother me. And if he were my repsonsibility I'd speak to him in no uncertain terms.

Put Kingy in as reserves captain - in other words in a situation where he has a bit of status - and he tries things. He gets himself forward, takes people on, plays quick one-two's and scores/makes goals. Put him in with the first team and he becomes just another holding player.

There was a brilliant example at Kettering where had time and space 30 yards out, could have attacked the Kettering defence and perhaps made something happen. That's exactly what he would have done against Quorn but instead he turned away and simply retained possession by giving the responsibility to someone else. He looked more concerned about not making mistakes and thus risking blowing his chances than showing exactly what he can do.

Someone really has got to give him the confidence to play his own game and do what he's good at. There's no question he's capable. But with the first team for company he becomes inhibited. Gradel, by contrast deosn't give a shit. If he doesn't make something happen the first time he tries again and again and again until he does.

He and Kingy will never be similar in style but Kingy could sure do with some of Gradel's attitude. Even when Campbell shouted at Gradel for not playing the ball to his feet Gradel sounded off back to the effect that Campbell had made a run towards the wing but had stopped. In other words, having made the run, Gradel had passed the ball to where Campbell was going. It was Campbell's hard luck that he stopped the run. Happily the two were soon back in unison within minutes.

Posted

Henderson



Gilbert Hobbs Morrison Mattock

Adams Wesolowski Oakley Dyer

Howard Fryatt

Is what I believe it will be. I reckon there's some issue with Tunchev, would be really, really nice to get some clarification from the OS.

Signing



Gilbert Tunchev Hobbs Mattock

Gradel Wesolowski Oakley Adams

Campbell Fryatt

Is what I'd quite like to see. Signing of a GK not that important tho.

Posted

Why does everyone not include Dyer in their teams i mean it's one game he has not impressed the crowd in but in the topic that Fez posted he said that Nigel Pearson was happy with Dyer trying to take players on and thats something we have been lacking over the years someone like Dyer and Gradel and Adams who like taking people on and getting the ball into the box.

Posted
Henderson

Gilbert - Hobbs - Morrison - Mattock

Adams - Oakley - Wesolowski - Gradel

Campbell - Fryatt

Just can't see that working.

On their day they can both be just ok.

Both light weight and feck about too much and drift in and mostly out of games.

A half decent defence would push Campbell offside, still like to see Howard and Chambers given part of a game

Posted
On the radio it sounded as if a DJ/Fryatt partnership would be worth experimenting with.

Yeah it would be, but having seen Fryatt and Chambers second half against Hinkley they played and linked up well, and having seen Sappleton against Quorn he is very strong and postive when coming forward and that would suit Fryatt as the ball will be played on the floor rather than long balls being knocked onto him. DJ and Fryatt is worth a go as they both looked sharp when playing together yesterday, but what i don't understand is why Fryatt was taken off for Howard, Pearson must still be deciding. And why did Morrison play the full game, is it because Pearson hasn't made his mind up about him yet?

Posted

Hendo

Gilbert----Tunchev----Hobbs----Mattock

Gradel----Oakley----Jimbo----Adams

Fryatt----DJ

Posted
Hendo

Gilbert----Tunchev----Hobbs----Mattock

Gradel----Oakley----Jimbo----Adams

Fryatt----DJ

Put Dyer in place of Gradel and switch Adams to the right and i think you'll have a good team probably the starting one for this game aswell. ^_^

Posted
Put Dyer in place of Gradel and switch Adams to the right and i think you'll have a good team probably the starting one for this game aswell. ^_^

Am I not allowed my own opinion on it then?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...