mmarkie Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 how the hell are so many of you picking Oakley, he is fooking shocking and has been his entire time hear, we got away with it last season as League One was so shit, more often then not when he gets the ball he gives it away Pearson will pick him cause he's the fooking captain, that's the problem.
Leicester Rule! Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 how the hell are so many of you picking Oakley, he is fooking shocking and has been his entire time hear, we got away with it last season as League One was so shit, more often then not when he gets the ball he gives it away Same could be said about King.
Jimmy Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Same could be said about King. King doesn't give it away anywhere near as much as Oakley, as for thee captaincy, said it for a while, give it to Hobbs full time
Bert Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 King doesn't give it away anywhere near as much as Oakley, as for thee captaincy, said it for a while, give it to Hobbs full time Not at this stage in his career, especially when we have the likes of, Brown, Wellens, Howard, Berner who are vastly experienced. King gave the ball away much more than Oakley yesterday.
Jimmy Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Not at this stage in his career, especially when we have the likes of, Brown, Wellens, Howard, Berner who are vastly experienced. King gave the ball away much more than Oakley yesterday. by all means have Brown do it until the end of the season (or he's dropped for a returning Tunch) King may have been as bad yesterday but for the season as a whole so far he retains the ball much better, just which he'd choose to/be allowed to shoot from distance more often, he has the ability to score out of nothing because of it, yet is either choosing not to or having that part of his game withheld from him (and by extension us)
Bert Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 That's another one of our problems. We try walking the ball in. Wellens, King and Oakley can all hit a ball well, so why don't they ever try?
Jimmy Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 it HAS to be instructions from the manage, same with Dyer, the most left sided player in the history of left wingers ever (slight exaggeration) constantly cutting inside or just playing on the right. when we gave Dyer the chance to run with the ball on the left he gave Gunter a few issues to deal with, but obviously the Forest winger helped him out in some sort of revolutionary tactic
Spiritwalker Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Even though I've always rated Oakley I must admit he's been poor lately. I would like to see how he plays in the middle before dropping him. I can't see NP making too many changes in defence because we don't have many options, Morrison could come in for one of the c.b's but I hope not at r.b because he is not a right back. Do we have any good full backs coming through? N'Guessan and Adams probably deserve a start and I wouldn't mind seeing Gallagher get a start up front.
Jimmy Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Even though I've always rated Oakley I must admit he's been poor lately. I would like to see how he plays in the middle before dropping him. I can't see NP making too many changes in defence because we don't have many options, Morrison could come in for one of the c.b's but I hope not at r.b because he is not a right back. Do we have any good full backs coming through? N'Guessan and Adams probably deserve a start and I wouldn't mind seeing Gallagher get a start up front. we saw Oakley/Wellens earlier this season, they were ineffective and constantly wanted to be in the same place, plus Oakley would keep going missing hence King was recalled
Leicester Rule! Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 we saw Oakley/Wellens earlier this season, they were ineffective and constantly wanted to be in the same place, plus Oakley would keep going missing hence King was recalled Oakley and Wellens would suit me for Tuesday night.....
Legend_in_blue Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 All I ask for is that we put players in the positions that they are accustomed to and are comfortable playing in. If it means putting Dyer and N'Guessan on the wings and two from Wellens/Oakley/King, then so be it. I'd go with Waghorn and Kermo up front. Fryatt on the bench at best imo.
Vlad The Impaler Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Even though I've always rated Oakley I must admit he's been poor lately. I would like to see how he plays in the middle before dropping him. I can't see NP making too many changes in defence because we don't have many options, Morrison could come in for one of the c.b's but I hope not at r.b because he is not a right back. Do we have any good full backs coming through? N'Guessan and Adams probably deserve a start and I wouldn't mind seeing Gallagher get a start up front. O'Neil is a good young player. Doubt highly he will be chucked in for the Bristol game though.
Lillehamring Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 weale morrison - hobbs - brown - berneroakley - king - wellens - dyeryann - waghorn
lcfcsnow Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Weale Oakley Morrison Hobbs Dyer Gradel King Wellens Gallacher Kermorgant Waghorn Oakley's legs have gone but we don't have an able right back so I'm sure he can do a better job than the useless Scot, and didn't Dyer do a decent job at left back last season for a few games?
Mikey Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 Weale Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner N'Guessan/Adams Oakley Wellens Dyer (should be Gradel) Kermorgant Waghorn
Sods Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 That's another one of our problems. We try walking the ball in. Wellens, King and Oakley can all hit a ball well, so why don't they ever try? Agree with all of that, apart from Wellens, I think he has dreadful strike on him. But your right we do need to stop looking for the perfect goal.
teblin Posted 6 December 2009 Posted 6 December 2009 That's another one of our problems. We try walking the ball in. Wellens, King and Oakley can all hit a ball well, so why don't they ever try? I was thinking the same today. The only player who has a shot from distance is gallagher.
Bluefoxtim Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 Oakley's legs have gone but we don't have an able right back so I'm sure he can do a better job than the useless Scot, and didn't Dyer do a decent job at left back last season for a few games? How did you not make it into top-flight management?
Lichfieldfox. Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 Bristol will not be worried at all. I sat next to the Bristol City assessor and he left 15 mins before the end. Against forest we defended to flat and deep. We were narrow in midfield and had no creativity. We failed to work as a unit. Whilst I would not be opposed to wholesale changes I think we need to keep an element of a spine in the team despite the spineless performance. I'd recall Gradel however that is unlikely to happen so: Weale Morrison - Hobbs - Brown - Berner Gallagher - King - Wellens - Dyer Kermorgant - Waghorn Subs: Oakley Fryatt McGivern Adams Logan Howard N'Guessen
foxaholic Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 WealeNeilson Hobbs Morrison Berner Adams King Wellens NGuessan/Dyer Waghorn Gallagher/Fryatt Got to play players in their correct position. Fryatt needs to work harder for his place. Need a win after this shocking performance against Forest. spot on why pay a million for a striker and never play him as one
Bryn Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 Last match I got to was WBA and when we finally woke up late on and started creating chances Gallagher was playing deep and central and making the play quite nicely. To those who go regularly, is this an option?
Guest Mee-9 Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 I'm definately ringing up Radio Leicester tonight.
RowlattsFox Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 I wouldn't be suprised to see Pearson send out the same team and hope he gets a response from them, I hope it doesn't but I wouldn't rule it out. No doubt Neilson will be the one from the defence to miss out if they're changes, even though I didn't think he was any worse than Berner, Hobbs and Brown but our lack of options suggest that those 3 will keep there place. Bristol City have Maynard and Haynes upfront, so therey're going to have the same problems with pace. Weale Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner N'Guessan Oakley Wellens Dyer Kermogant/Gallagher Waghorn Subs: Logan, Neilson, McGivern, Adams, King, Kermogant/Gallagher, Fryatt Would rather see Adams then Dyer but I don't think theres much chance of that happening. either Yann or Gallgher up with Waghorn, think both could work quite well.
Sparky Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 Weale Morrison Berner Hobbs Brown N Guessan King Wellens Dyer Gallagher Waghorn
SamL Posted 7 December 2009 Posted 7 December 2009 Weale Morrison Hobbs Brown Berner N'Guessan King Wellens Dyer Waghorn Gallagher
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.