Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 Just a thought, maybe some people just don't want a red kit, just because they don't? Nothing to do with Forest or anything like that. Seems like anyone that doesn't want one gets berated. I'd sooner have a black or white strip than a red one.
Fosse Boy Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 Just a thought, maybe some people just don't want a red kit, just because they don't? Nothing to do with Forest or anything like that. Seems like anyone that doesn't want one gets berated. I'd sooner have a black or white strip than a red one. Fair enough if that's the case, but it just seems to be the reason that the majority give.
Finchy Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 Just a thought, maybe some people just don't want a red kit, just because they don't? Nothing to do with Forest or anything like that. Definitely my reason. Our badge looks odd on red, not into it. Our white away kits have always looked the best.
Narborough_fox Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 I wouldn't like a red kit in all honesty, don't know why though.
Ozwin Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 I'm a firm believer of having kits that are the colours of the badge. Blue, white and yellow please.
lcfcsnow Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 I'm a firm believer of having kits that are the colours of the badge. Blue, white and yellow please. Orange? No idea where our yellow kits have come from tbh, and since when has there been a yellow fox?
BlueSi13 Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 Orange with blue shorts and white socks would be amazing imo
Ozwin Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 Orange with blue shorts and white socks would be amazing imo Hell to the **** yeah. Who's the Photoshop wiz on here? Make a mock up for us.
Lillehamring Posted 24 June 2010 Posted 24 June 2010 I really don't want to be caught walking around with some silly bright yellow collared shirt made out of synthetic fabrics, regardless of sponsor. you mean like the one in your sig
Brainy Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 the wait must have something to do with Pearson leaving.
MC Prussian Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 The club responsibles are still "too shocked" following Pearson's departure - I guess it puts everything into perspective, so they decided to hold the release back until they've fully recovered.
Jordan Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 I heard we're so broke that we can't afford an away kit this season, so away games that require a clash will be shirts vs. skins.
RGFox Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 Went into the club shop today, woman still don't know when it'll be released. As it's yellow I think I'll give it a miss....
baylisslcfc Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 Personaly I think this just stupid now just show us the damn kit, it been about a month now and it will probably just be another average shirt <_<
davieG Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 Personaly I think this just stupid now just show us the damn kit, it been about a month now and it will probably just be another average shirt <_< They haven't sorted the sponsor out yet.
Cobbo Posted 1 July 2010 Posted 1 July 2010 I hear the delay in its release was the main reason cited by Pearson for moving to Hull. He may have said that Hull were too big a club to turn down publicly, but behind closed doors he was seething at the delay of this wondrous 'workman's jacket - first of its kind' kit release.
nothin2seehere Posted 5 July 2010 Posted 5 July 2010 I heard we're so broke that we can't afford an away kit this season, so away games that require a clash will be shirts vs. skins. "WHAT? YOU FORGOT YOUR KIT? YOU NEED TO DO IT IN YOUR PANTS THEN". That's what we had to do at school anyway
Matt Posted 5 July 2010 Posted 5 July 2010 I can see a double unveiling, Sousa posing with the new sponsor on the home (and/or) new away shirts. I hear Mandaric felt Pearson didn't have enough style to do it so pushed him out and got Sousa in.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.