Bugg Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 We don't need Howard, we've got Yann who is basically Howard but younger and better. (Yes, I'm being serious)
bluearmyfox23 Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 We don't need Howard, we've got Yann who is basically Howard but younger and better. (Yes, I'm being serious) As much as I hate him for the peno miss I do agree with u
bald reynard Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 We don't need Howard, we've got Yann who is basically Howard but younger and better. (Yes, I'm being serious) Yann's gone / going - he's not got a squad number, so he's out ! I wouldn't mind him staying / being given a second chance - but it looks like Sven doesn't have plans for him.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 We don't need Howard, we've got Yann who is basically Howard but younger and better. (Yes, I'm being serious) I disagree.. I think Howard is a better option on the bench.. Better in the air and a better target man.. He`ll score and create more the Kermo..
ScouseFox Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 I agree with those saying we need to keep him or get in someone else like him. We need a bullying bastard up top in case we can't break down the 10 men behind the ball at home against Doncaster of whatever.
Bugg Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 I disagree.. I think Howard is a better option on the bench.. Better in the air and a better target man.. He`ll score and create more the Kermo.. The only thing Howard does in the air is give away a foul.
Nath Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Better in the air? ... He barely ever wins a header, and when he does he has to foul his man for it. Kermorgant offers a lot more than Howard does.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Better in the air? ... He barely ever wins a header, and when he does he has to foul his man for it. Kermorgant offers a lot more than Howard does. Lets see what Sven thinks..
Petchy Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 And people are assessing Kermorgant on what? I saw nothing from him at all in the 20 odd times he played for us. At least with Howard you know for a fact that he'll come on and disrupt their defence. Either way, I'm not too fussed if he stays or goes.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 And people are assessing Kermorgant on what? I saw nothing from him at all in the 20 odd times he played for us. At least with Howard you know for a fact that he'll come on and disrupt their defence. Either way, I'm not too fussed if he stays or goes. That seems to have shut em up..
Petchy Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 That seems to have shut em up.. Indeed. Obviously just the assumption that he's 'decent' wasn't a good enough counter argument.
ozleicester Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 To be honest, thanks to Stevie, hes worked hard and saved us on a few occasions however he is getting on, at his size and age, an offer of 300,000 would be quite tempting. i havent seen a lot of kermo, but the little i have seen and what i saw at Kettering was enough to say that given time to fit, he would be an adequate replacement in a role that i dont expect us to make a great deal of use of this season.
Beeza Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Steve Howard is well loved in that part of the world him and Oakley they worship to their hearts content maybe but their side is crap and isn't likely to get any better. He deserves better.
Beeza Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 I agree. His abilities are limited but he offers some things no other player can. Mainly being a big, horrible bastard up front. 100 % agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HoustonFox Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 So do they want Oakley or Howard or is this all from the Steve Oakley stuff? I'd keep him though, looking a bit sharper this pre-season and a good nuisance factor. I think the poor not that much running etc pre-season of Sousa didn't help him (among others) for last season.
John Matrix Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 i we could get money for those two and off the wage bill it would be great. it's good to have that experience at the club though. regardless of their current football ability.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Heard rumours of Oakley to Leeds. He`s got to be going somewhere but never thought Leeds...
yorkie1999 Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Howard to derby, oakley to leeds, tunchev to palace...these are definitely sidesways steps imo
m00nie Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 Howard to derby, oakley to leeds, tunchev to palace...these are definitely sidesways steps imo yea maybe howard should hold out till man u come in for him...
Bettsj2 Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 No ****ing way. If Howard goes, who's gonna give away free kicks with 15 minutes to go when we're chasing the game??
Guest Basildon Fox Posted 4 August 2011 Posted 4 August 2011 How in any way is Kermogant better? What in ****s name has he done to warrant any kind of comment about him being better than Howard? 1 youtube clip aside he was a passenger in virtually every single game he played for us. Then there is that penalty. Hope the useless piece of shit is being shipped out. Absolute waste of space. Ffs better than Howard my arse.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.