Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
VinceNoir

Burnley Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Posted

Really does show how poor the business we have done is when that's the side after 15 odd million spent.

That said, pleased for Big Steve, he deserves his start, go get em boys!

The club have said we spent nowhere near that, and most of it was spent on the defence.

Posted

Starting team just looks wrong to me........:dunno:

I know I have the serious hump with City at the moment but with that lineup I really cannot see how that midfield can function, Wellens and King as the central pairing always get overun, whether they play side by side or one up and one back doesn't seen to matter.

Neither Danns nor Gallagher are natural wide men so I can see trouble coming down the flanks if they play narrow but if they stay wide we will get blown away through the middle.......:cry:

I know that is pessimistic, real doom and gloom, but that is how I see things at the moment, sorry.

Still I've given my thoughts up front (rather than after the event as usual......:P), hope I am wrong so you can all have a go at me......:thumbup:

Posted

I would have dropped Bamba not St. Ledger. Not a fan of Gallagher but hopefully he will do something decent as he played for Blackburn. Abe's protection will be missed in my opinion, I always felt the Wellens -- King combination is not that strong. I would always play Howard from the bench but I am glad he has the chance to start.

Posted

Maybe he fell down the stairs? That was the reason behind Rab Douglas' 'injury', and we never saw him again. Sabotage anyone? :ph34r:

Posted

positive line up... looks like were gonna give it a good go and attacking options on the bench!!!

still wondering whats happened to fernandes though...???

Posted

also glad beckford is on the bench, maybe give him a kick up the arse and show he needs to work hard to get in the team! heres hoping howard and nugent have a stormer to prove a point to him!

Posted

Starting team just looks wrong to me........:dunno:

I know I have the serious hump with City at the moment but with that lineup I really cannot see how that midfield can function, Wellens and King as the central pairing always get overun, whether they play side by side or one up and one back doesn't seen to matter.

Neither Danns nor Gallagher are natural wide men so I can see trouble coming down the flanks if they play narrow but if they stay wide we will get blown away through the middle.......:cry:

I know that is pessimistic, real doom and gloom, but that is how I see things at the moment, sorry.

Still I've given my thoughts up front (rather than after the event as usual......:P), hope I am wrong so you can all have a go at me......:thumbup:

I share your concerns but don't think we've many alternatives.

Probably would have kept Howard as an impact sub but very pleased he's involved as he makes a huge difference.

Posted

The club have said we spent nowhere near that, and most of it was spent on the defence.

Exactly. And most of them have been at least decent so far. Beckford is the only one who has disappointed so far out of the signings with fees.

Pretty sure it's 4-3-3 anyway people. Danns - Wellens - King.

Posted

Starting team just looks wrong to me........:dunno:

I know I have the serious hump with City at the moment but with that lineup I really cannot see how that midfield can function, Wellens and King as the central pairing always get overun, whether they play side by side or one up and one back doesn't seen to matter.

Neither Danns nor Gallagher are natural wide men so I can see trouble coming down the flanks if they play narrow but if they stay wide we will get blown away through the middle.......:cry:

I know that is pessimistic, real doom and gloom, but that is how I see things at the moment, sorry.

Still I've given my thoughts up front (rather than after the event as usual......:P), hope I am wrong so you can all have a go at me......:thumbup:

I'm feeling the same, Wellens/King combo just not strong enough which will result in Danns playing more defensive role and Gallagher, well he'll be his usual hit or miss only time will tell. but then with Howard and Nugent up front we'll probably go direct which Stowell seems keen on.

Posted

Points to prove tonight in Danns and Beckford. Howard also must show he's more than a comedy character. Frightening that Johnson and Fernandes are out of favor given how poor we've been of late. I still don't see why Wellens is in our team, I hope Johnson and Beckford make impacts if called upon because we've signed them for such qualities.

2-1 City

Posted

Foxeplayer not working for me, anyone else?

Works fine for me. Stringer just said that Burnley haven't lost a midweek game at Turf Moor for 4 years. That's some stat!

Posted

Works fine for me. Stringer just said that Burnley haven't lost a midweek game at Turf Moor for 4 years. That's some stat!

1-0 us then.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...