jonlcfc1990 Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Anyone who wants Pearson gone has to give someone to replace him surely? There is no one in the market worth replacing him with and if you show the players that they can play with no effort and passion and all that happens is the manager leaving you will breed an unhealthy relationship between players and the new manager. Pearson isn't the problem there are too many players who aren't giving 100% STILL this late on in the season and that's what needs addressing
Happy Fox Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Anyone who wants Pearson gone has to give someone to replace him surely? There is no one in the market worth replacing him with and if you show the players that they can play with no effort and passion and all that happens is the manager leaving you will breed an unhealthy relationship between players and the new manager. Pearson isn't the problem there are too many players who aren't giving 100% STILL this late on in the season and that's what needs addressing #It would be lovely if we could sack players, but that is not how it works does it's the manager who is always culpable. NP will be judged in the summer if the deadwood and we all know who they are (Wellens, Gallagher, Howard etc), are still on the books then we aint getting promoted.
marbelladave Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 I love NFP for his attitude and 'front', fantastic....... But then again his on field tactics are practically medieval....... For me the crunch will come when he finishes his sorting out and rebuilding, hopefully by the start of next season. If we are still playing 4-4-fooking-2 hoofball then I am done. Rather watch the games on the park sunday mornings.......
carlhltid Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 No he didn't. he had full backiing of billionaire owners ? to bring who hw wanted in ?
Cecchini1976 Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 If I am not mistaken Pearson took the job knowing that he was brought in to finish in the top 6 at worst. He took the job knowing this. I have read people blaming Sven or the ego's of some of the players, at the end of the day, when Pearson took over we were 3 points from the play offs. Since then we have taken 26 from a possible 57 points. If you were Pearson's boss, how would you asses his performance?
carlhltid Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 And because he didn't work miracles in the January window, he isn't the man to sort it out? i am starting to wonder
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 i agree pal pearson had an open checkbook in january and who has he brought in ? we have some great players here and if he cant get us to win more games he has to go oretty soon What the hell is a checkbook?!?!?!
carlhltid Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 I don't think you understood the point of that post, considering you're still choosing to ignore the fact that we've had good results too. If you expected Pearson to show up and kick us into the prem you're a very delusional man. aint that the plan ?
Callabinho Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 If you want Pearson out of the club.....you're a stupid c**t and need your head checking! The guys inherited a squad that is unbalanced, full of egos, full of individuals and he needs time to sort it out. How many managers have we had in the past 6 years? The only 1 that has been successful is Nigel and now your talking about getting rid of him...again after last time.....****ING C**TS MATE! Thank you! sacking managers is why we are not in the premier league, you can't just go around firing manager left right and center! It doesn't do you any good at all. It's still Svens team and until Nige ship's out the shit we will continue to be inconstant. We should know better than anybody what Nige's teams are like. Next season we could be a rigid as Hull, with the ruthlessness of Southampton! So give Nigel a break and get behind him. I've had enough of this "I've supported this club for 30 years, and I know best bollocks".
dave the caveman Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 What worries me about Pearson is the really poor job he has done at bringing a fragmented squad together. A manager on the top of his game can get people together and working for him instantly. Under Pearson we still to this day have little spats between him and his players bubbling away under the surface. I'm starting to think that Pearson may not be able to handle the type and strength of personality that is often present in higher quality players and thus, he will never be able to manage premiership players. This explains the reasoning behind casting aside expensive and talented players in favour of finding relatvely unknown players in the lower leagues. If the scope of player that Pearson is capable of working with is really as narrow as it seems right now then we are wasting our time. I don't want him out yet, but it is not unfair to judge his performance so far and my view is that he needs to improve.
carlhltid Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 at the end of the day since he took over we aint been good simple who agrees ?
Louise Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 If you want Pearson out of the club.....you're a stupid c**t and need your head checking! The guys inherited a squad that is unbalanced, full of egos, full of individuals and he needs time to sort it out. How many managers have we had in the past 6 years? The only 1 that has been successful is Nigel and now your talking about getting rid of him...again after last time.....****ING C**TS MATE! Correct. Nigel will sort the team out if given a proper chance at it.
Dan Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 People are acting as if he should've turned the entire squad around in January. Our funds aren't as great as people think, not when you've got absolutely obscene money being spent on wages. People think that bringing Howard on was a joke but if we're being forced into hoofball, what good would bringing Schlupp on do? I personally think we can do better than Howard and would hope we do next season, but just remember what the Reading fans said, they said they were a fantastic side off the ball, and are extremely hard to play against, do we seriously have the quality to break that down? Do we fvck. If we're having to resort to hoofball, then Howard was a better option than Schlupp, or Beckford, fact. No manager in the world was going to turn this shambles that Sven left around, literally no one, anyone who could would be an utter genius. Next year, when Pearson's got rid of our ego's, our obscene wages, our journeymen, and replaced them with better players who have higher potential and are getting the results, then the complaints will soon die down. This just proves how laughably impatient football fans have become.
Guest Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 at the end of the day since he took over we aint been good simple who agrees ? Whereas we were world beaters before he took over again?
LCFCCHRIS Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 I like Pearson but I'd rather of had him because he really wanted to come to leicester again. Not the money.
dave the caveman Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Our funds aren't as great as people think, . Implying you know something other people don't, so, um, source? We have plenty of spending power, it's just that not many players want to come here and Pearson can only manage a certain type of person.
z-layrex Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Totally agree, so many ****** follow this club. Yeah lets fire ANOTHER manager that always solves everything.
smudger63 Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Ultimately it doesn`t matter what we think, it will be the owners that decide Pearsons future, and as they showed with svens sacking, when 3 points off the play offs, patience is not something they have in abundance. We as fans may think the league season is over, but Pearsons fate could very well be determined by the remaining games this season, and If the owners feel the players are not responding to the manager, he could very well find himself out the door come the summer. At this moment in time, i`m not even sure that our players are even responding to each other, let alone the manager, and rightly or wrongly, Pearsons furure is very much in the hands of those players!
Haydos Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Next year, when Pearson's got rid of our ego's, our obscene wages, our journeymen, and replaced them with better players who have higher potential and are getting the results, then the complaints will soon die down. This just proves how laughably impatient football fans have become. See other posts of mine. Who are 'egos' and 'journeymen'? These are just buzzwords. So, egos....Mills and Beckford? That's about it. Journeymen? Paintsil? Hasn't really had much of an effect on results I don't think. Honestly can't think who else you're referring to apart from Howard maybe. Konchesky possibly, but he's been one of our best players. Vassell at a push, but I'm sure you didn't just interchange 'old' with 'journeyman'. There's several problems, not just Mills and Beckford. Stop being drawn into this 'Sven's mess' bullshit with no basis.
Charl91 Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 Pearson should be given an entire season - just as Sven should have been, and then judged on how it goes on from there. Haven't been particularly impressed with Pearson so far though.
Steve Agnew Posted 11 March 2012 Posted 11 March 2012 See other posts of mine. Who are 'egos' and 'journeymen'? These are just buzzwords. So, egos....Mills and Beckford? That's about it. Journeymen? Paintsil? Hasn't really had much of an effect on results I don't think. Honestly can't think who else you're referring to apart from Howard maybe. Konchesky possibly, but he's been one of our best players. Vassell at a push, but I'm sure you didn't just interchange 'old' with 'journeyman'. There's several problems, not just Mills and Beckford. Stop being drawn into this 'Sven's mess' bullshit with no basis. Can't agree more. Its like the mantra of a failing government. People need to think, and gather some detailed understanding and analysis before making the mistake of a crude oversimplification. History shows such crude scapegoating, is very dangerous!
GingerrrFox Posted 11 March 2012 Author Posted 11 March 2012 If you want Pearson out of the club.....you're a stupid c**t and need your head checking! The guys inherited a squad that is unbalanced, full of egos, full of individuals and he needs time to sort it out. How many managers have we had in the past 6 years? The only 1 that has been successful is Nigel and now your talking about getting rid of him...again after last time.....****ING C**TS MATE! Right well after beginning to sober up after yesterdays visit to Reading I still stand by what I put smashed at 3am. Nigel Pearson is the only manager that has had success at this club in the last 6+ years he got us promoted and then we went straight to the playoff semi-finals. When he was forced out of the club by Milan wanting Paulo Sousa - which was an absolute joke in the first place. Nigel went to Hull, started a rebuilding job and now look at where they are with a young team, all playing for each other and most importantly PLAYING AS A UNIT. Look at QPR and watch that documentary that's on BBC IPlayer and look at what the state of the club was when they kept constantly changing managers, as soon as Warnock came in they gave him the rest of the season, at the start of next season they were much improved and got promoted. People need to stop being so fickle and calling for the managers head every time we lose 2 on the bounce, it's ridiculous as well some of the comments coming out of people's mouths. "I want Premier League, I want a manager that will give us Premier League". Don't we all want this club to be successful? The best way to do that is get round the lads and the manager and not get on their backs and support them. If we start losing games like 4-0 at home to Coventry (near bottom of the league) then there is a cause for concern. And for the record, I didn't agree with Sven being sacked either I always feel managers should be given at least 1 full season in a job before being judged.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.