THEFATBASTARD Posted 29 May 2012 Author Posted 29 May 2012 Take the batteries out! cucumber is vegetable, rabbit is animal...
I am Rod Hull Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 right, my mistake, so the local chippy is fuelling the birth explosion in chavland ? cos there is always a jar on the counter ...makes total sense to me.. I bet there is something in kebabs aswell,, I blame the fookin turks for our plight. Its been going on since the early 80`s. The government know about it but Harry Ramsden is pulling all the strings in Whitehall. Its quite simple really- Chip shops and fast food joints sell Gherkins Chavs eat them Chavs make lots of babies Chavs cant be arsed to cook Chavs feed kids on fast food Chippy gets a new generation of clientele Its a vicious circle.
I am Rod Hull Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 What? Pineapple rings? Only if they`re battered and deep fried.
cambridgefox Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 cucumber is vegetable, rabbit is animal... As in "im sweating like a nun in a field full of cucumbers"
THEFATBASTARD Posted 29 May 2012 Author Posted 29 May 2012 Its been going on since the early 80`s. The government know about it but Harry Ramsden is pulling all the strings in Whitehall. Its quite simple really- Chip shops and fast food joints sell Gherkins Chavs eat them Chavs make lots of babies Chavs cant be arsed to cook Chavs feed kids on fast food Chippy gets a new generation of clientele Its a vicious circle. we have got no chance then.... i always wondered why they were called pickled scotch eggs, the fooking jocks are a perfect example.. deep fried mars bars must be shit hot fertility drugs...hope they vote for independance..or we will be overun with by kilt wearing little bastard nuisances..
MooseBreath Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 In all seriousness, I don't think you can discount the fact that thanks to another brilliant liberal brainwave they basically get paid to have kids Come to think of it, driving down the intelligence in the population could potentially be seen as an act of genius among the elite, so perhaps it wasn't the liberals afterall. El empty? There's one to get your teeth into: the elite are using benefits to incentivise procreation among less intelligent members of the population in order to make us easier to rule.
Jaspa Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 Sure I saw a documentary a couple of years back on the exact subject, but over in America Something to do with the military industrial complex needing millions of idiot soldiers, but low numbers of intelligent people so the cream of the crop can be more easily shaped and in control. Il have a look around for it later
Captain... Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 In all seriousness, I don't think you can discount the fact that thanks to another brilliant liberal brainwave they basically get paid to have kids Too right, and we shouldn't have a national health service because some people are basically getting paid for having cancer.
MooseBreath Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 Too right, and we shouldn't have a national health service because some people are basically getting paid for having cancer. Yeah because people can just turn cancer on and off when it suits them
THEFATBASTARD Posted 29 May 2012 Author Posted 29 May 2012 Im a fooking idiot, does that mean im a chav?
Captain... Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 Yeah because people can just turn cancer on and off when it suits them And people can just turn their kids off if they can't afford them.
The Doctor Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 And people can just turn their kids off if they can't afford them. I think that tends to be illegal.
MooseBreath Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 And people can just turn their kids off if they can't afford them. Behave. Seriously, your comparison is moronic, and you know it.
Captain... Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 Behave. Seriously, your comparison is moronic, and you know it. That was the point exposing how moronic your original statement was, by being equally moronic. People who deliberately put themselves at a much higher risk of cancer, and other illnesses are a drain on the NHS and cost the nation a huge amount, more so than the very small number of people who do deliberately have children to get more money off the state. You seem to be advocating scrapping child benefits despite the amount of children from poorer backgrounds it has helped keep out of poverty. So should we scrap the NHS because some people exploit it and benefit from it more than others?
MooseBreath Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 That was the point exposing how moronic your original statement was, by being equally moronic. People who deliberately put themselves at a much higher risk of cancer, and other illnesses are a drain on the NHS and cost the nation a huge amount, more so than the very small number of people who do deliberately have children to get more money off the state. You seem to be advocating scrapping child benefits despite the amount of children from poorer backgrounds it has helped keep out of poverty. So should we scrap the NHS because some people exploit it and benefit from it more than others? Some people have children so they can get paid more in benefits. Nobody has ever started smoking so they could get free cancer treatment on the NHS. I can't believe even you could make such an absurd comparison. You must be trolling.
Jon the Hat Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 Some people have children so they can get paid more in benefits. Nobody has ever started smoking so they could get free cancer treatment on the NHS. I can't believe even you could make such an absurd comparison. You must be trolling. I think you might be slightly exaggerating your first point. I could buy that people who come from a background of living on benefits dont worry about having kids in quite the same way as people who are working from a financial point of view. And potentially that some teenage girls think they will get their own flat if they have a baby. But you would have to be more stupid than your average Chav to think you would actually be cashing in by having a baby.
21st Century Fox Posted 29 May 2012 Posted 29 May 2012 It's cheaper than buying a turkey at Christmas anyway.
ozleicester Posted 30 May 2012 Posted 30 May 2012 Seriously... watch this movie..even this trailer gives the answers [media=] [/media]explained from about 50 seconds in
Rincewind Posted 30 May 2012 Posted 30 May 2012 Babies are not babies forever. They turn into teenagers. Would you have a fully grown teen so as to claim benefit?
Captain... Posted 30 May 2012 Posted 30 May 2012 Some people have children so they can get paid more in benefits. Nobody has ever started smoking so they could get free cancer treatment on the NHS. I can't believe even you could make such an absurd comparison. You must be trolling. Your problem, is not this fictitious idea that people are popping out sprogs to earn money, this does not happen, people are being facilitated to have as many children as they want, but the actual amount of child benefit is quite small and is not going to allow people to make a living off having children, as you seem to believe. The more common reason for women becoming baby factories is through a sense of self worth, if they are a mother then they have a purpose, a role. Now is there room for reform in child benefits? Yes. Should we be subsidising families that choose to have 10 children? When the other option is children falling in to poverty then yes. Should families be allowed to have 10 children? Probably not but how do you police that? Forced hysterectomies after 3 children? Take children off parents? Everyone on here is so glib, pointing and laughing at chavs, but the real reason why "chavs" have more babies is because society and the education system and their parents have failed them. They either lack the intelligence or education to understand the consequences of unprotected sex, or they see no other purpose in their lives than to procreate, it is a natural instinct after all. The same can be said for those that wilfully put themselves at greater risk of serious disease by eating/drinking/smoking too much. You're problem is you see people getting something for nothing, being helped through the state funded by those that are more fortunate, you see other people getting something and you think you should be entitled to it to, or that they shouldn't have because they don't work as much as you, or in as good a job as you, you're ok and have managed to get so far without taking money off the government so why can't everyone else why do they have to sponge off the state? Because of the inbuilt inequalities created by the society we have today, and the unwillingness by the privileged to help out the less so. Benefits, like the NHS, like Welfare are there to help all, and yes they are open to exploitation, and sometimes it may be that some benefit more than others, through accident, design, or just plain stupidity, but that is the sacrifice we have to make to have such wonderful things such as the NHS, low child poverty, and low infant mortality. You want to reduce the number of people bringing up their children on benefits, either provide them with the education and jobs and the means to earn a decent living, or take away their benefits and then when they fall into poverty their kids. I know which I prefer.
flowwolf Posted 30 May 2012 Posted 30 May 2012 Im a fooking idiot, does that mean im a chav? No Chav's have to be intelligent enough to buy Burberry have you got some ?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.