Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 MPs expenses? More for individuals than Governments as a whole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 More for individuals than Governments as a whole. Okay, how about Andrew Gilligan reporting that WMD dossier had been sexed up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacamion Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Like the conspiracy that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Nah, more like the Moon Landings, John F Kennedy, Princess Di, 9/11, The Boston Marathon bombings, and, pathetically, the murder in Woolwich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Nah, more like the Moon Landings, John F Kennedy, Princess Di, 9/11, The Boston Marathon bombings, and, pathetically, the murder in Woolwich. So you believe the Warren Commission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Okay, how about Andrew Gilligan reporting that WMD dossier had been sexed up? Ten years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Ten years ago. The Andrew Mitchell plebgate affair? Is that yet another anomaly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 The Andrew Mitchell plebgate affair? Is that yet another anomaly? Questioned only some three months after the event and I do not remember the media challenging the original narrative from the Police when it happened. Surely the bigger embarrassment is for Plod? That is now seemingly whitewashed as in the subsequent six months of "investigation" it has not gone anywhere. Are the "reputable" media all over this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Questioned only some three months after the event and I do not remember the media challenging the original narrative from the Police when it happened. Surely the bigger embarrassment is for Plod? That is now seemingly whitewashed as in the subsequent six months of "investigation" it has not gone anywhere. Are the "reputable" media all over this? It's yet another example of the unquestioning press trying (and succeeding) to get a minister sacked. Any journalist would love to bring a govt down and any pretence that they are all pro govt stooges is frankly pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 It's yet another example of the unquestioning press trying (and succeeding) to get a minister sacked. Any journalist would love to bring a govt down and any pretence that they are all pro govt stooges is frankly pathetic. Equally ridiculous to suggest that the press in general are reputable. How many newspapers (and potentially other media outlets) have corruptly paid for information from Public Officials? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Equally ridiculous to suggest that the press in general are reputable. How many newspapers (and potentially other media outlets) have corruptly paid for information from Public Officials? Why would they do that? According to you the govt tell them what to write. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 Why would they do that? According to you the govt tell them what to write. So we can conclude that news gatherers in the UK are neither reputable nor investigative. Just as well ordinary people ask difficult questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 So we can conclude that news gatherers in the UK are neither reputable nor investigative. Just as well ordinary people ask difficult questions. How do you conclude that they are not investigative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 24 May 2013 Share Posted 24 May 2013 How do you conclude that they are not investigative? They rewrite Government (National and Local) press releases and then pay Public Officials for tittle tattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaspa Posted 25 May 2013 Share Posted 25 May 2013 Is someone going to have create an El Empty well-being thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad the Fox Posted 25 May 2013 Share Posted 25 May 2013 This thread is hilarious. Chameleon bags. No blood, blood, no blood. Red arrows to prove a man has a bag, foot, cap and sunglasses (maybe he doesn't have eyes after all we can't see them), and the FBI aren't very good at photoshopping. I think the one thing that proves this is no conspiracy is the large ammount of variables, too much that can go wrong, too many ways that the authorities could get found out. If they wanted to set a bomb off they could have done with a lot less fuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Posted 12 July 2013 Share Posted 12 July 2013 http://xrepublic.tv/node/4365 Former wrestling teammate says the guy in the court hearing is NOT Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno Posted 12 July 2013 Share Posted 12 July 2013 http://xrepublic.tv/node/4365 Former wrestling teammate says the guy in the court hearing is NOT Dzhokhar Tsarnaev The source is so convincing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEGGSY Posted 12 July 2013 Share Posted 12 July 2013 http://xrepublic.tv/node/4365 Former wrestling teammate says the guy in the court hearing is NOT Dzhokhar Tsarnaev All he said was, he didn't look like him, because his face was swollen, and his body language was different, as expected, he's being tried for terrorism.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzFox Posted 13 July 2013 Share Posted 13 July 2013 This thread is hilarious. Chameleon bags. No blood, blood, no blood. Red arrows to prove a man has a bag, foot, cap and sunglasses (maybe he doesn't have eyes after all we can't see them), and the FBI aren't very good at photoshopping. I think the one thing that proves this is no conspiracy is the large ammount of variables, too much that can go wrong, too many ways that the authorities could get found out. If they wanted to set a bomb off they could have done with a lot less fuss. Exactly the same as WTC "conspiracy", but it didn't stop a 50 page thread on the subject Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 19 July 2013 Share Posted 19 July 2013 On the link are a lot of so-called previously unseen pictures of the Boston manhunt. Apparently Rolling Stone placed the Boston Bomber on the cover of their magazine; Boston Magazine published these afterwards. http://imgur.com/a/yFRgC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marko Posted 8 April 2015 Share Posted 8 April 2015 Despite the tin foil helmet brigade on here claiming it was a conspiracy, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has, unsurprisingly, been found guilty of the attacks. Found guilty on death penalty charges so it will move to second phase of the trial to decide whether to execute or give him life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.