Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
trotterfox87

Players for next season, Who do want, Who's free?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is @LCFCWorld reliable?

Sorry to ruin the fun guys but I'm going to have to be sceptical about most twitter accounts.

You are sceptical about most things aren't you.

Posted

Nope. It will ruin agents. Which is a good thing, they have been acting as transfer leeches for way too long.

Suppose that's one was if looking at it, however as you said they are leeches, and usually find ways to cling on!

Posted

just seen that. Also says Danns is in talks with Forest and Huddersfield, and apparently Connor Sammon is joining us according to him haha.

They also said Yeovil want Darkish Vassell lol lol

Posted

You are sceptical about most things aren't you.

 

Like what? I was positive throughout the entirety of last season despite the general mood of the forum.

 

On this particular topic I don't see how I can be criticised for not trusting this account, it clearly isn't reliable.

Posted

Like what? I was positive throughout the entirety of last season despite the general mood of the forum.

 

On this particular topic I don't see how I can be criticised for not trusting this account, it clearly isn't reliable.

 

I don't necessarily trust it, but thought I'd relay the speculation. Don't know how reliable for transfer news.

 

Would be a very good signing IMO though, what do you reckon??

Posted

I don't necessarily trust it, but thought I'd relay the speculation. Don't know how reliable for transfer news.

 

Would be a very good signing IMO though, what do you reckon??

 

Yes definitely, although arguably similar to our current CMs. Perhaps we should go for a man with more experience but still, I wouldn't say no.

Posted

The same agent who tweeted last night that Connor Sammon is in talks with us over a £1.2million deal, tweeted about Bannan today.

Posted

You are sceptical about most things aren't you.

Don't say anything nasty to him!

It's getting crazy now, you can post any kind of li k albeit how credible without it being questioned.

Posted

Don't say anything nasty to him!

It's getting crazy now, you can post any kind of li k albeit how credible without it being questioned.

how dare you say that ;) 

 

we know all these "agents/ITK" are all really reliable sources  :ph34r:  :rolleyes:  lol

Posted

Funny one Bannan, looked a cracking player when he first burst onto the scene in this league but seems to have tailed off a little. I'd still trust Pearson's judgment on this though.

Posted

Problem with bannan is we'll have another player who is best 'in the hole' but will be played as a winger. Will still take him though.

He'll be accused of being too lightweight aswell!
Posted

Remember an old colleague who is a Villa fan highly rating him a few years ago.  Supposedly a neat creative player. Would be a good move for both parties, as sounds like he needs a some regular footie again

Posted

Likes the piss too according to my mates in Brum.....

They would be right, can be accused of being lightweight for the midfield by some on here but certainly likes to get stuck in other areas.

Posted

Paddy Madden or Matt Ritchie?

 

 

I am sure they would want to stay at there respective clubs because both are guaranteed first team spots.

Posted

I really do hope Schlupp gets a good go on the wing or up front this year. The experience gained last season should hopefully mean he turns up in 13/14 a much improved player. That being said, Lloyd Dyer on his day has the potential to be deadly in this league, so as far as left midfielders go, i think we should be covered. 

I still believe strength and physicality is something we've lacked in the middle over the years, and an imposing central midfielder would be a much needed addition. 

Posted

Wouldn't decline Church, assuming he's very cheap. Which I guess he must be.

Think he's better than Waghorn but quite similar and still not prolific.

Posted

Wouldn't decline Church, assuming he's very cheap. Which I guess he must be.

Think he's better than Waghorn but quite similar and still not prolific.

I'm sure I read/heard somewhere that Church is out of contract.

Doubt he'd demand high wages either.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...