kylestyle06 Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 The opposition have yet to score against us in a league game. Get in. Setting a new club record under Pearson. Get in again. Now all we need is our strikers to be more consistent in scoring goals themselves and we're set for the season. Didnt boros goal count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Err the back 3 as in Schmeichel, Morgan and Moore. The back 3 that was in a flat out panic for much of the second half of last season when ever the ball came into our box, they couldn't keep a clean sheet to save their lives. Obviously no Keane this time and Moore was excellent today, but I regard Schmeichel and Morgan as the senior pros and they failed badly last season and need to improve, maybe they have. So essentially a completely different 'back 3' playing a completely different system for the first time ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbelladave Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Didnt boros goal count? Although it might look like it at times, St Ledger was not actually playing for the opposition that day..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylestyle06 Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Although it might look like it at times, St Ledger was not actually playing for the opposition that day..... Smart arse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbelladave Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 So essentially a completely different 'back 3' playing a completely different system for the first time ever. Please yourself, just pick a fight with someone else, I can't be @rsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbelladave Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Smart arse So you can say arsed, I wasted I perfectly good @ in the post above...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoneDog Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Did that really deserve a ban? No. Harsh use of the ban button there. Whoever did it was probably a head prefect at school and I'm just glad that whoever it was is not a policeman. Having a taser in their pocket would go reet to their head and they'd probably end up tasering an OAP to death or something! Moderator - Take a good look in the mirror, and ask yourself if this is what you really wanted to end up like. Unban him, I order you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox in the North Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 The opposition have yet to score against us in a league game. Get in. Setting a new club record under Pearson. Get in again. Now all we need is our strikers to be more consistent in scoring goals themselves and we're set for the season. Didn't jukebox score against us in the first game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 No. Harsh use of the ban button there. Whoever did it was probably a head prefect at school and I'm just glad that whoever it was is not a policeman. Having a taser in their pocket would go reet to their head and they'd probably end up tasering an OAP to death or something! Moderator - Take a good look in the mirror, and ask yourself if this is what you really wanted to end up like. Unban him, I order you. Like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 17 August 2013 Share Posted 17 August 2013 Didn't jukebox score against us in the first game? No it was kingfox's favourite player/banterer. He was on a roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdb Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Schlupp looked pretty exposed on the highlights there. Can't be easy playing as a (sort of) make shift full back in a 433. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnotherShitSeason Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 No. Harsh use of the ban button there. Whoever did it was probably a head prefect at school and I'm just glad that whoever it was is not a policeman. Having a taser in their pocket would go reet to their head and they'd probably end up tasering an OAP to death or something! Moderator - Take a good look in the mirror, and ask yourself if this is what you really wanted to end up like. Unban him, I order you. ANSWER HIM YOU COWARDS!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester_Numan Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Did that really deserve a ban?When you add it to the numerous other insults he's thrown at people, I'd say one was overdue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 I can't help but feel we got away with it a bit but that's the sign of a good team - two away wins already is terrific. The centre halves were fantastic, but other than that I thought we were largely awful. Hopeless going forward. We'll need to improve to maintain it in my opinion, but you cannot knock 7 points from the first 9 possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnotherShitSeason Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 When you add it to the numerous other insults he's thrown at people, I'd say one was overdue Prime example of the double standards on here. Not to mention all the spineless little snitches running to teacher 'BAN HIM BAN HIM' for fvcks sake. Do you cover your ears at the game as well in case you hear any rude words? He's obviously been banned due to the power wielding paid club stooges being instructed to act against the anti-pearson posters. One day I expect the same will happy to me. Weed out the voices of dissent so we can all pretend it's OK. Either that or there's some right little bitches on here that can't handle being called a 'Plank'. How did you ever manage to get through school?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shade Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Prime example of the double standards on here. Not to mention all the spineless little snitches running to teacher 'BAN HIM BAN HIM' for fvcks sake. Do you cover your ears at the game as well in case you hear any rude words? He's obviously been banned due to the power wielding paid club stooges being instructed to act against the anti-pearson posters. One day I expect the same will happy to me. Weed out the voices of dissent so we can all pretend it's OK. Either that or there's some right little bitches on here that can't handle being called a 'Plank'. How did you ever manage to get through school?? I don't think anyone is "pretending" that 7 out of 9 is okay, I think we all agree it is, whilst discussing possible improvements. you ronald mcdonald. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 I think some people might be being a bit harsh on us. Firstly, great day out, really enjoyed the pub before the game, the atmosphere and of course the result. Absolutely classic moment at the Navigation when Bernie came in and the whole crowd just parted, and when he got to the bar everyone just shouted 'aaaaggghhhhhhh' in unison. The bar girl had never seen anything like it! Anyway, I thought it was a satisfactory performance from us. We defended very well, Morgan and Moore were solid as rocks and all 3 midfielders were committed and got vital tackles and interceptions in throughout the game. In the first half we could/should have had 2 before the goal whereas Derby were limited to one half-chance. We definitely edged it. In the second Derby dominated possession but again, they only had a couple of half chances. We looked like we were dealing with them until Pearson inexplicably brought Knockaert and Dyer on, and took Wood and James off, who were both playing important roles at the time. After that we couldn't keep the ball at all and it was just wave after wave of pressure. But we stood firm and overall it was a good away performance. The Football League Show tried to suggest Derby deserved to win but that's uter bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillo Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Good result last year we would of ended in a draw we seem to be more resiliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munshi Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 I think some people might be being a bit harsh on us. Firstly, great day out, really enjoyed the pub before the game, the atmosphere and of course the result. Absolutely classic moment at the Navigation when Bernie came in and the whole crowd just parted, and when he got to the bar everyone just shouted 'aaaaggghhhhhhh' in unison. The bar girl had never seen anything like it! Anyway, I thought it was a satisfactory performance from us. We defended very well, Morgan and Moore were solid as rocks and all 3 midfielders were committed and got vital tackles and interceptions in throughout the game. In the first half we could/should have had 2 before the goal whereas Derby were limited to one half-chance. We definitely edged it. In the second Derby dominated possession but again, they only had a couple of half chances. We looked like we were dealing with them until Pearson inexplicably brought Knockaert and Dyer on, and took Wood and James off, who were both playing important roles at the time. After that we couldn't keep the ball at all and it was just wave after wave of pressure. But we stood firm and overall it was a good away performance. The Football League Show tried to suggest Derby deserved to win but that's uter bollocks. I thought forget this, I didnt want to go anywhere near him and his dirty hat. Someone sprayed him with Perfume during the game aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hornyhollthefox123 Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Schlupp looked pretty exposed on the highlights there. Can't be easy playing as a (sort of) make shift full back in a 433. He's shit that's why. Can't defend and has no end product when he gets forward as a full back. Striker or nothing for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 This is a damn good start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dedlock Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 A solid start.Two away wins provides a good foundation. A criticism last season, pre-collapse, was our indifferent away form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 This is a damn good start Aye. And yet the bickering continues... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 He's shit that's why. Can't defend and has no end product when he gets forward as a full back. Striker or nothing for me I thought he did ok considering he had nothing in front of him. He held his position well and kept a decent shape throughout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Prussian Posted 18 August 2013 Share Posted 18 August 2013 Prime example of the double standards on here. Not to mention all the spineless little snitches running to teacher 'BAN HIM BAN HIM' for fvcks sake. Do you cover your ears at the game as well in case you hear any rude words? He's obviously been banned due to the power wielding paid club stooges being instructed to act against the anti-pearson posters. One day I expect the same will happy to me. Weed out the voices of dissent so we can all pretend it's OK. Either that or there's some right little bitches on here that can't handle being called a 'Plank'. How did you ever manage to get through school?? You see, as long as you're still implying that people on here are getting paid by the club, I just can't take you seriously. I think it's save to say that many of us "paid club stooges" share that feeling, by the way. Dishing out insults left and right just for the sake of it is not a "voice of dissent" at all, it adds nothing to a discussion and it makes the one using the insults actually look like a... plank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.