Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Bluearmy 316

Let get Brighton out our system. What team should we play against burnley - pre match.

By Bluearmy 316, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Harry - LCFC

Harry - LCFC

Posted
Posted

You don't drop your captain.

 

I agree. Whether you think it's fair or not I wouldn't consider dropping Morgan after only two bad performances. Taking him out of the team sends out a bad message IMO, that you've lost some confidence in one of your key players.

dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted

Miquel was easily one of our best players yesterday.

 

Personally I don't think so. Definitely largely at fault for the 1st goal and the defence as a whole was the reason we lost yesterday. Like I said, I don't think he's played too badly but I am right in thinking that in the handful of games he has played that we've lost to Charlton, Wednesday and Brighton? We've only lost 5 games all season and Miquel has played in 3 of those yet only appeared in a 3rd of our games this season. Coincidence? Perhaps, perhaps not. Either way I think we saw from having Keane in the side last season that just because a young centre back looks decent, and is probably going to be a good player, that doesn't stop them from creating problems for the defensive unit. I'm not suggesting that the defence has only been dodgy when he's played because the frailties were there long before, but its still a big concern for me.

 

Moore is a much better option IMO.

Devonfox1884

Devonfox1884

Posted
Posted

Schmeichel

De laet Morgan Moore Schlupp

Knocky Drinky King Dyer

Wood Vardy

Subs: Logan, Konch, Miquel, James, Hammond, Taylor-Flectcher, Nuge.

I think was needs a breather, it's not his fault he's being played out of position, but he hasn't looked good.

Miquel hasn't played 'badly' but i think moore is a better defender and he is one of our own, not one of Arsenal's.

Konch also needs a rest, and i think Schlupp and Dyer can cause Burnley all sorts of problems like they did at Watford.

I think Wood should start, however Nige seems to love Nuge, so i doubt it will happen.

De laet coming back in will make a massive difference IMO, it gives our defence a much, much better balance.

If we play this team, i think we can beat Burnley, and beat them convincingly, 3 or 4-1. COYB

emmo1987

emmo1987

Posted
Posted

Be very surprised if de laet comes straight in the 11? Could be very rusty.

nps 11

Schmichael

Moore Morgan Miguel Konchesky

Knockaert King Drinkwater Dyer

---------nugent vardy---------

Logan, De Laet, wasilewski, Hammond, James, Wood, Gtf

MooseBreath

MooseBreath

Posted
Posted

Kasp

RDL

Moore

Morgan

Schlupp

Knocky

Drinkz

Kingo

Dyer

Nuge

Vardy

Wouldn't be too bothered to see Schlupp in place of Konch, Wood in place of Nuge, James in for either of King or Drinky. But it must be 442 and we must play both Knocky and Dyer. If Pearson goes for 433 again or takes Knocky off if we're chasing the game again then I'm calling for his head.

Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted

Schmeichel

De Laet - Morgan - Miquel - Konchesky

Knockaert - James - Drinkwater - Dyer

GTF - Vardy

 

Subs; Logan, Wasilewski, Moore, Schlupp, King, Nugent, Wood

 

Would be a big gamble, but I've been more impressed with GTF's cameos than I have with Nugent/Wood recently. Wouldn't be against Wood starting.

Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted

 

Kasper

 

RDL-----Wes-----Miquel-----Konch

 

Drinkwater-----King

 

Knockaert-----GTF-----Lloyd

 

Vardy

 

 

I like that.

Simonb

Simonb

Posted
Posted

If fit de laet in...

Kasper

De laet

Moore

Morgan

Konch

Knockaert

King

Drinkwater

Schlupp

Vardy

Wood

Think wasyl nuge n dyer need a rest as forms gone and james went missing in the ladt two games. It'd be good to see the back four from beginning of season bavk together too. De laet dependant

harpendenfox

harpendenfox

Posted
Posted

Sorry to be pedantic, but James only went missing from the Brighton game because he wasn't picked. He played well against Millwall. I think there's little to choose between them, although King brings a better chance of a goal

Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted

Kasper

De laet

Moore

Morgan

Konchesky

Knocky

Drinks

James

Dyer

Vardy

Wood

Socks

Socks

Posted
Posted

                 Kasper

 

De Laet Moore Morgan Konchesky

 

    Drinkwater/James     Schlupp

 

  Knocky                           Dyer

 

               Vardy   Wood    

gazfox9

gazfox9

Posted
Posted

Kasper

De Laet

Moore

Morgan

Koncheskey

Knockaert

Drinkwater

King

Dyer

Nugent

Wood

Subs - Logan, Wasyl, Miquel, James, Schlupp, GTF, Wood

Exact side I would go for too that.

Bilbo

Bilbo

Posted
Posted

I couldn't see a topic on this so I've started one.

I'd like to see Moore and De Laet come back into the back four to replace Was and Miquel. Also I think Knockaert needs to start.

Going for 1-1 result.

Devonfox1884

Devonfox1884

Posted
Posted

4-1 city-back with a bang. Vardy, knocky, nuge and GTF with ours. Vokes for them.

I'd like to see a 4-2-3-1 type formation, which would go as follows:

Kasper

De laet

Morgan

Moore

Konch

James

Drinky

Knocky

GTF (in the hole)

Dyer

Vardy

Bilbo

Bilbo

Posted
Posted

4-1 city-back with a bang. Vardy, knocky, nuge and GTF with ours. Vokes for them.

I'd like to see a 4-2-3-1 type formation, which would go as follows:

Kasper

De laet

Morgan

Moore

Konch

James

Drinky

Knocky

GTF (in the hole)

Dyer

Vardy

I like the look of that line up, although Pearson rarely plays James and Drinkwater together so I think King would probably be in for James.

Wilson_6

Wilson_6

Posted
Posted

             Kasper

 

RDL Moore Morgan Konch

 

Drinkwater James King

 

Vardy Nugent Lloyde

 

2-1 Citeh! Nugent with a brace!

Devonfox1884

Devonfox1884

Posted
Posted

I like the look of that line up, although Pearson rarely plays James and Drinkwater together so I think King would probably be in for James.

i don't like king when he is playing defencivly, i think drinky and james would be much more solid, although i do get where your coming from, it's just my opinion. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...