Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Arriba Los Zorros

How to break down sides that park the bus?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Something that is a worry following the Watford game and will become an issue especially in home games. We can't expect to win them all like we have done until now if we don't siplay more nouse. But how can NP and the team get a side which thrives on the counter attack, to break down sides that defend deep and in numbers? Thoughts?

Posted

It's not that we're not creating chances against Watford we had 18 attempts on goal but only 3 were on target as well as 10 corners so better more composed finishing would go a long way to turning potential draws and losses into wins.

Posted

The first rule of thumb is try not to concede sloppy goals on the counter attack.  I think it's about varying the angles of attack and probing areas all over the attacking third, with a variation of long and short passes.  It also helps if we can get an early goal in games, this gives the opposition little choice than to try to get an equaliser, giving us more space in behind.  We have players that can beat a man in the shape of Vardy, Anthony and Lloyd which can also help to create that vial space.  Having Kevin Phillips as well helps because you know in those goal mouth incidences, he is going to be there.

Posted

The first rule of thumb is try not to concede sloppy goals on the counter attack.  I think it's about varying the angles of attack and probing areas all over the attacking third, with a variation of long and short passes.  It also helps if we can get an early goal in games, this gives the opposition little choice than to try to get an equaliser, giving us more space in behind.  We have players that can beat a man in the shape of Vardy, Anthony and Lloyd which can also help to create that vial space.  Having Kevin Phillips as well helps because you know in those goal mouth incidences, he is going to be there.

:thumbup:

Posted

Get Drinkwater to shoot from distance

Certainly we should be trying from just outside the box more often rather than trying to pass it through impossible gaps or just pushing the ball out wide

Posted

It's not that we're not creating chances against Watford we had 18 attempts on goal but only 3 were on target as well as 10 corners so better more composed finishing would go a long way to turning potential draws and losses into wins.

Beat me to it, almost word for word.

Posted

The first rule of thumb is try not to concede sloppy goals on the counter attack.  I think it's about varying the angles of attack and probing areas all over the attacking third, with a variation of long and short passes.  It also helps if we can get an early goal in games, this gives the opposition little choice than to try to get an equaliser, giving us more space in behind.  We have players that can beat a man in the shape of Vardy, Anthony and Lloyd which can also help to create that vial space.  Having Kevin Phillips as well helps because you know in those goal mouth incidences, he is going to be there.

excellent response!! agree with all of this

Posted

You missed out Nugent...............

we dont NEED Nugent in the side, although i highly rate him, in my opinion this side would be good on the counter as it offers three different creative ways to break down teams who defend in numbers.

Posted

we dont NEED Nugent in the side, although i highly rate him, in my opinion this side would be good on the counter as it offers three different creative ways to break down teams who defend in numbers.

We have won 9 out of 9 before the Watford draw, with Nugent in the team, and are creating plenty of chances, if we do start struggling at home then yes by all means make the odd change, but the need for that is a few games away yet, if at all.

Posted

Dyer-Vardy-Knockaert

King-Drinkwater-James

Koncesky-Morgan-Moore-De laet

Schmeichel

433? By far our least effective attackimg formation as proved every time we've played it. Not for me.

The way to beat defenaive teams is by scoring twice like we did against Watford while not conceding more than once ie it's about keeping your concentration at the back while maintaining faith that you have the ability to break through eventually.

Posted

Watford weren't the first to park the bus. What about earlier on in the season, the likes of Millwall etc? Our counter attacking play is fast and decent at times, we need to score more goals from set pieces especially corners.

Posted

Watford weren't the first to park the bus. What about earlier on in the season, the likes of Millwall etc? Our counter attacking play is fast and decent at times, we need to score more goals from set pieces especially corners.

There can't be many faster than us on the break, your right. Set piece goals or lack of has been a problem for a few seasons now, I guess we are not the tallest of sides but a few more from our centre backs would be useful.

Posted

Oh my god, really? Thanks for letting me know. Seriously why would you post that reply? Why not post something meaningful? lol

What I was getting at is why he left out Nugent? And put King in?

 

Maybe that's because King is a more clinical finisher than Nugent.

 

That line-up might look thin on strikers but if our midfielders could be persuaded to shoot more from outside the box we could well get more goals from that source - last Saturday showed that they were more than capable from that distance.

Posted

Maybe that's because King is a more clinical finisher than Nugent.

 

That line-up might look thin on strikers but if our midfielders could be persuaded to shoot more from outside the box we could well get more goals from that source - last Saturday showed that they were more than capable from that distance.

4 3 3 is not a great formation with us, if the view is that Nugent is not worth his place (he is imo) then play Phillips or Wood. It's not as if we are not creating chances with our current formation, I just cannot see the logic in playing an extra midfielder to break teams down.

That's football I guess, divided opinions.

Posted

Play Knockaert in the middle behind one striker and tell him to shoot from distance non-stop.

One striker of Jamie Vardy sprinting in on any rebounds.

3 midfielders of Drinky James and King passing it, retaining possession.

Two wide men of Mahrez and Dyer roaming around but very attack minded.

Three at the back of Wes, Moore and Konch/Was/RDL.

Kasper in goal.

Keep it on the deck. Quick passing football. Stretch them, tire them out.

Never play hoof ball.

Posted

Play Knockaert in the middle behind one striker and tell him to shoot from distance non-stop.

One striker of Jamie Vardy sprinting in on any rebounds.

3 midfielders of Drinky James and King passing it, retaining possession.

Two wide men of Mahrez and Dyer roaming around but very attack minded.

Three at the back of Wes, Moore and Konch/Was/RDL.

Kasper in goal.

Keep it on the deck. Quick passing football. Stretch them, tire them out.

Never play hoof ball.

Would you start with this formation or is it a formation to change to in game if we cannot break teams down?

Guest MarshallForEngland
Posted

If we'd have had another 5 minutes at Watford we'd have probably won the game. I think the frenzied urgency when we are losing needs to begin a few minutes earlier, not on the 89th or 90th minute. Mahrez and Phillips could have been brought on a few minutes earlier too, and at the same time. I know that going for it to such an extent is a risky strategy, and I don't think we should go 2 at the back for too long at the end of a match we are losing, but that sense of urgency and kitchen-sink approach starts just a bit too late.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...