Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Jon the Hat

Church of England Proves its utter irrelevance

Recommended Posts

Posted

You just have to defend anything don't you, it doesn't matter if it's Peter Tatchell trying to shag a 9 year boy or a gay person's right to throw his queerness on a whole City.

 

The parody argument is bollocks for me and even if it wasn't it isn't an excuse, is it an excuse for the EDL to go around smashing up a town centre because that's the "image" people have created of them in their heads? Of course it isn't.

 

There has always been a large section of this lot that not only want to be proud of their sexuality but also to force it down a many peoples throats as possible, that's what gay pride is, a mixture of some strange vanity and a big fcuk you to society, legalise it and we'll keep it indoors, will they fcuk, I'm not happy, I'm going to parade my filth in public and you are a homophobe if you don't tolerate and accepting even the most disgusting public displays of perversion. Carnival?? You must have been to different ones than me, I've never heard of any carnival being purely about sexuality which this one is. It's not gay pride, it's perverted pride.

 

To try and twist it as an occurance of people not tolerating them is ridiculous and certainly gives them no right at all, I'm intolerant of religion as well, it doesn't give them the right to march down the street preaching the most odious beliefs that cordons off half of town for a summer a year.

 

The flamboyant gay image being outdated? I'll believe it when I see it, just flick on the BBC on a weekend evening. If you encourage something it will continue to happen.

 

And you'll get more poor insecure lads going through this, god knows what he had to put up as these so called "gay parties". Stripped naked at 16-17 to be fondled by a room full of gay men, if you want to keep thinking this is all fine and normal so be it but a lot of people arent buying into it. Least he didn't to Barrymores's.

 

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/british-teenager-committed-suicide-after-relationship-gay-tv-comedian230314

 

I'm not defending anything, just stating fact mixed with opinion and experience, Gay Pride exists because homosexuality, whilst legal wasn't accepted and seen as deviant, most gay people are not deviants and into leather and BDSM,  but it is an image they adopted as they had it forced upon them. Claiming it back rather than it being seen as an insult. Most gay men are embarrassed by it and would never dream of wearing anything like nipple clamps in the street. Some embrace it and love playing up to that side of thing to deliberately outrage and offend, very few do it because they think it is a good look. I'm not defending anyone, just explaining why it happened and why it will decrease as tolerance increases.

 

It is an outdated image, you mention the BBC, look at Graham Norton now, he used to be an innuendo filled, giggling queen, now, whilst still camp, he is a lot easier to watch and his sexuality has taken a back seat, thankfully Julian Clary is off our screens, he was insufferable. There are more people out there who when you find out they are gay you go "really?" because they don't ram it down your throat any more, such as Derren Brown, or Simon Amstell, I'm struggling to think of others. Matt Lucas and we all thought it was the other one, he hasn't made a career out of his sexuality, Stephen Fry, again has a career as a comedian and host, he hardly camps it up, and makes non stop innuendo.

 

Yes you still get media tarts who use their sexuality as means to get more exposure, Louis Spence being a prime example, I'm sure there are others, but it is decreasing.

Posted

How would you define it, traditionally, given that gay marriage wasn't allowed until last Friday?

Well given infertile couples have long been able to get married, it's hardly child-centric.

Traditionally it's a union between a man and a woman/a woman plus concubines/a woman and her slave/his brothers widow/someone he raped/a prisoner of war... Being about children doesn't appear in it at any point.

Posted

Next time I take my dog for a walk through the park after dark and come across some gays looking for sex I'm just going to bend over and take it because it's obviously my fault that they feel the need to express themselves in such a way. There was some opposition to dog walkers in my local park recently too, so while I'm at it I'm going to smear dog shit all over my face to create an outrageous parady of myself as a dog walker.

Posted

And you'll get more poor insecure lads going through this, god knows what he had to put up as these so called "gay parties". Stripped naked at 16-17 to be fondled by a room full of gay men, if you want to keep thinking this is all fine and normal so be it but a lot of people arent buying into it. Least he didn't to Barrymores's.

 

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/british-teenager-committed-suicide-after-relationship-gay-tv-comedian230314

 

As for that link, thanks for it now being in my internet history on my work laptop btw, I don't see how it is any different if it had been a girl, as I said there are cvnts in all walks of life, and I'm pretty sure plenty of girls have been seduced by presents from celebrities into doing something they regret.

Guest MattP
Posted

As for that link, thanks for it now being in my internet history on my work laptop btw, I don't see how it is any different if it had been a girl, as I said there are cvnts in all walks of life, and I'm pretty sure plenty of girls have been seduced by presents from celebrities into doing something they regret.

 

If I have outed you at work it's a shame but you could see the link, what did you think was coming after a post like that?

 

They have and they generally go to court for it and are punished afterwards.

Posted

Next time I take my dog for a walk through the park after dark and come across some gays looking for sex I'm just going to bend over and take it because it's obviously my fault that they feel the need to express themselves in such a way. There was some opposition to dog walkers in my local park recently too, so while I'm at it I'm going to smear dog shit all over my face to create an outrageous parady of myself as a dog walker.

:D

Dogshit Smearing Club meets on Knighton Park every Tuesday evening at 7 pm for canine-excrement / face painting fun.

The codeword is 'facemuck' and the safeword is 'I'm a Tory MP'.

Although I may have just broken the first rule of Dogshit Smearing Club...

Guest MattP
Posted

Next time I take my dog for a walk through the park after dark and come across some gays looking for sex I'm just going to bend over and take it because it's obviously my fault that they feel the need to express themselves in such a way. There was some opposition to dog walkers in my local park recently too, so while I'm at it I'm going to smear dog shit all over my face to create an outrageous parady of myself as a dog walker.

 

lol

Posted

If I have outed you at work it's a shame but you could see the link, what did you think was coming after a post like that?

 

They have and they generally go to court for it and are punished afterwards.

 

Generally? I would say rarely, there have been lots of stories of celebrities abusing people and getting away with it, but that is a separate issue. In the article it says that the inquest is continuing, so I presume if any wrong doing is found the celebrity will be punished, I just don't see the relevance unless you are suggesting that this celebrity is being treated any differently because he is gay, but there is nothing in that article that suggests that.

Posted

As for that link, thanks for it now being in my internet history on my work laptop btw.

 

What's wrong with that?

Posted

What's wrong with that?

 

It just adds to the ever growing list of inappropriate things that would appear in my work laptop's history as I slack off on here for a while. It will probably get lost in the sea of Foxestalk pages though... :unsure:

Posted

You know nothing of either of those two religions by the sounds of it. I highly doubt you've read either of those books you enjoy deriding. Get a grip on yourself, and not in a gay way.

 

Some of you people won't be happy until we've got naked lesbians cutting down crosses with chainsaws like happened in Ukraine. It matters not to you people that the cross they cut down was a monument to a million Christians who were genocided.

 

Perhaps you'd also enjoy a Pussy Riot type campaign in English churches where they barge in and start acting like they're still in playschool to make a political point in front of the old dears who are there trying to peacefully think about their deceased loved ones and other serious (to some people) matters.

 

You literally have no clue about history regarding Christians, Muslims and Jews. These three groups have gone through more suffering than any group on earth, and some of you can't wait to keep bashing at them. You are a zionists wet dream.

 

Ironically mainly at the hands of each other. Certainly got nothing to do with the Nazi's according to you. 

Posted

Ironically mainly at the hands of each other. Certainly got nothing to do with the Nazi's according to you. 

 

I've asked him who caused it, looks like he's chosen not to reply. Shame.

Posted

Heathens have also suffered at the hands of those three groups. Burnt at the stake, stoned to death and crucified to name three methods in the name of a loving god.

Posted

Heathens have also suffered at the hands of those three groups. Burnt at the stake, stoned to death and crucified to name three methods in the name of a loving god.

 

And we have to go to Hell for eternity.

Posted

And we have to go to Hell for eternity.

Hmm, if a belief in God is required to enter Heaven, it seems reasonable to suggest that a belief in Satan is required to enter Hell.

Maybe there's a third option for unbelievers..

Posted

Hmm, if a belief in God is required to enter Heaven, it seems reasonable to suggest that a belief in Satan is required to enter Hell.

Maybe there's a third option for unbelievers..

 

Pergatory, where nothing ever happens. A bit like watching Stoke

Posted

The homophobes are out in force.

 

I'd estimate that there are more straight weirdos than gay weirdos.

 

Don't let someone else's marriage or private life worry you boys. Get on with living your own - and try not to hurt anyone.

Posted

The homophobes are out in force.

I'd estimate that there are more straight weirdos than gay weirdos.

Don't let someone else's marriage or private life worry you boys. Get on with living your own - and try not to hurt anyone.

What have you based that estimate on exactly?

Posted

What have you based that estimate on exactly?

 

On the total number of homosexuals compared to heterosexuals in society.

 

It's a logical presumption considering humanity.

 

Perhaps you could think of it in terms of poor McDonald's burgers and poor Sally Burgers.

 

There's sure to be more por McDonald's burgers because they make so many more.

 

Do you need further help with the matter?

Posted

I don't really give a monkeys about gay pride - I personally don't get offended very easily, so it'll take more than some bloke in a gimp mask being walked like a dog to get me on my high horse - I remember visiting London when I was about 7 or 8 with my folks and seeing a gay pride parade - we stopped to have a look for a bit and I thought it was funny to be honest. I just think it's a bit depressing that some gay people feel the need to play up to some kind of stereotype, when on the whole we live in such an accepting, tolerant and cosmopolitan society.

 

I've got quite a few gay mates and none of them are stereotypical at all, they're comfortable in their own skin and they're just like me really, they're just regular blokes, completely happy with who they are - and that's how it should be. If they want to be flamboyant or camp, that's fine too, but don't play up to it because of some outdated misconception. 

Posted

I don't really give a monkeys about gay pride - I personally don't get offended very easily, so it'll take more than some bloke in a gimp mask being walked like a dog to get me on my high horse - I remember visiting London when I was about 7 or 8 with my folks and seeing a gay pride parade - we stopped to have a look for a bit and I thought it was funny to be honest. I just think it's a bit depressing that some gay people feel the need to play up to some kind of stereotype, when on the whole we live in such an accepting, tolerant and cosmopolitan society.

 

I've got quite a few gay mates and none of them are stereotypical at all, they're comfortable in their own skin and they're just like me really, they're just regular blokes, completely happy with who they are - and that's how it should be. If they want to be flamboyant or camp, that's fine too, but don't play up to it because of some outdated misconception. 

 

As you say it's just a percentage, it's the same with hetero's who play the sterotypical role to an extreme.

Posted

As you say it's just a percentage, it's the same with hetero's who play the sterotypical role to an extreme.

 

Yeah - TBH I find the stereotypical #LAD culture to be far more annoying than a few camp blokes.

Posted

 

Some of you people won't be happy until we've got naked lesbians cutting down crosses with chainsaws

 

Perhaps you'd also enjoy a Pussy

Can you PM me the links.

I am over 18.

Guest MattP
Posted

The homophobes are out in force.

I'd estimate that there are more straight weirdos than gay weirdos.

Don't let someone else's marriage or private life worry you boys. Get on with living your own - and try not to hurt anyone.

Who are talking about exactly when you say the homophones are out in force?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...