Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
What is the usual outcome of all that possession though? We are more likely to give the ball away in a dangerous area than create a chance because we don’t play possession with a purpose. It’s all backwards and sideways.
What has him being French got to do with anything.
Even with Iborra and Ndidi, Puel’s style of play puts our defence under pressure. Because after a hundred sideways and backwards passes we eventually lose the ball in a dangerous area and the opposition can counter.
The teams shape, working as a unit, how the midfield shields the defence, defending from the front, etc. All of this is non existent under Puel - we’ve seen opposition players get inbetween the lines every week.
Shame Dewsbury-Hall isn’t on the bench.
A lot of our u23s really could have taken the next step this year by going out on loan or being in and around the first team squad.
A few of the lads need a chance next season. If we can promote from within we’ll save a load on transfer fees too.
We should have improved upon our previous style, not changed it so radically. Look at Atletico Madrid as an example, they are a counter attacking team like we were. But they have added elements like keeping possession to their counter attacking style, not just abandoned it completely.
Do we? It looks like we’re going one way and that’s to play possession football. We’re becoming as one dimensional as we ever have been. When have we played counter attacking football under Puel?
This happens quite frequently even with Ndidi in the side. Iborra being the deepest CM is only able to move at a snails pace off the ball, so any opposing midfield with some good movement can get in between the lines very easily.
Our defensive structure is non existent and is one of the reasons our defence looks so poor.