honeybradger

For saying a player with 85 PL goals is a good player? I wasnt saying that we had a chance of signing him, just that if we did sign him he would be good for us.

Rashford is bad for a £350,000 Manchester United star player, for our level if we could get him on decent wages he would be a good signing. Similar type of player to Harvey Barnes and he was good for us.

To be fair to him, us being outside the relegation zone when he left is about as good as it was ever going to go down between him and us. Considering our performances he hasnt left us in too bad of a spot (arguably his transfers are what have hurt us most).

Ugo Raghouber from Lille on loan at USL Dunkerque is the kind of player Steve Walsh would sign as an unknown from Ligue 2 for £1m that would go on to be one of our best players.

Need a new DM, new fullbacks, new centrebacks and maybe a new winger.

Rodgers has the FA cup but personally I think him getting relegated despite inheriting one of the best squads in the league at the time will win out as his main legacy here. The longer we go without being able to establish ourselves as a PL team, the more people will realise what was squandered by Rodgers.

We had our best chance to establish ourselves as PL regulars after the title win, we wont get that chance back. I think Rodgers will slip further and further down this list the more time we spend in the championship over the next decade or so, there's not many managers around who have done as much damage to a club as he has.

Winks over Drinkwater is a ridiculous opinion. Regardless of what happened at Chelsea, Drinkwater won a league title for us, including a great performance at the Etihad where he bullied David Silva of all players.

Somehow we quite comfortably perform worse off the pitch as a club than on the pitch. In the past year alone we've somehow managed to make ourselves enemy Nr 1 for the PL and EFL in respect to looking to give us a point deductions and transfer embargo. Now our shirt sponsor has gone bust. One day the club's poor leadership is going to catch up to the club, like it did in 2023 after years of mismanagement, except we're going to fall even further next time with our legal loopholes no longer working.

He's a player that only excels in possession. Considering we are towards the bottom of the league it wouldn't be that big of an issue if we lost him and used a midfielder that protects the back line more.

Sounds a bit like Iheanacho at Man City

He was arguably our best player last season. He's a much better player than Skipp at least, who we shelled out 2/3 of his transfer fee for.

People talk like Alves's ACL has ruined him. When was the last time we produced a player who could control the ball like this

Rutter is doing alright at Brighton who are 8th. I feel it's harsh to say Dewsbury Hall is not a top half PL player, a team like Brighton is probably around his level.

Yes he did miss loads of sitters last year but he also scored 7 and assisted 5 in 1000 minutes. He's nowhere near as bad as he is made out to be on here.

Yes he did but I am not bothered about golden boots personally. Lineker showed can can step up against good opposition like 1986 Argentina and 1990 Germany whilst Kane hasnt done that for England yet, even if those teams did knock England out.

He was really bad at the last Euros, top scorer or not, most people who watched would agree. He was decent at the 2018 world cup but he was poor against the good teams we faced like Croatia and Belgium. Compare him to someone like Lineker who scored against Argentina in the quarter final in 1986 who went onto win it and West Germany in the semi final in 1990 who also won it, Kane doesnt really perform against the best teams.

When England are playing I have no faith in Harry Kane in big tournament matches despite him being England's all time top scorer. That's why I will never rate Kane as highly as most, he doesnt inspire confidence that he's going to get you over the line. I think there's a ridiculous stat that he has 0 shots on target in ths 6 finals he has played. Vardy has less goals than Kane but what he has achieved is far greater and it feels like he has a bigger impact on the success of the team. I'm certain that if you gave Vardy the opportunities Kane has had (10 years at Spurs and England's Nr 1) he would have won trophies.

He will get plenty of gametime for us this season with Vardy being old and Edouard being Edouard.

We haven't lost against any of Crystal Palace, Everton, Southampton or Ipswich which is the most important thing. We need to do the same in the second half of the season as well though.

Could we go for Van Nistelrooy once United get Amorim?

He reminds me of the time I ate food that was a month out of date because it looked ok. This lad is pure diahorrea.

It's actually worse than that. Soumare and Thomas were relatively decent. We now have even worse players in Bobby Reid and Edouard that make you question whether Thomas and Soumare were ever that bad in the first place.

Andy King at least scored good goals. Skipp is a defensive workhorse type without the defensive ability.

Could have gone to Brighton tbf which would have suited him more.