foxes161 Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Be cheaper than theo and only 22 We don't want either him or Walcott they're both shit, what the hell is wrong with some of you?? We just won the league and now we want to sign useless Arsenal cast offs? ****s sake. Curious What kind of talent do you think we can actually sign?
z-layrex Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Be cheaper than theo and only 22 Curious What kind of talent do you think we can actually sign? Arsenal fans are all laughing at us begging us to take them saying we'll have Mahrez off your hands. We can find much cheaper talent elsewhere. These two have been nothing but useless for most of their careers and they will not fit into our team. We need to build not ****ing dismantle just because we won the prem. You're all mental honestly.
foxes161 Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Arsenal fans are all laughing at us begging us to take them saying we'll have Mahrez off your hands. We can find much cheaper talent elsewhere. These two have been nothing but useless for most of their careers and they will not fit into our team. We need to build not ****ing dismantle just because we won the prem. You're all mental honestly. They are still talented and sometimes players need a change of teams to make the most of that talent We also need far more depth and guys who have experience at this level
roblcfc84 Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Arsenal fans are all laughing at us begging us to take them saying we'll have Mahrez off your hands. We can find much cheaper talent elsewhere. These two have been nothing but useless for most of their careers and they will not fit into our team. We need to build not ****ing dismantle just because we won the prem. You're all mental honestly. I think some fans have delusions of grandeur - the title was an unbelievable achievement but a team achievement - the sum is greater than the parts but man for man - based on individual ability - the arsenal squad is significantly better than ours - I think a few fans need to get a grip. All of our "stars" were cast offs or have we forgotten that already and learned nothing! Mahrez was a raw talent when he first came and taking nothing away from him, it's coaching and patience that have paid off with him Vardy, Drinky - if you think we couldn't get a performance out of the ox or Walcott you seriously need to get a grip
SpinneyHillRanger Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 None have the composure of mahrez, but they do have pace. As cast offs, they will fit in with the others at our club. Problem with Walcott and ox is wages and price.
UPinCarolina Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Ozil could do a job. if we swap/part exchange mahrez/kante with ANY arsenal players we're getting ripped off.
FireFox Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Ozil could do a job. No way, he's a bottler, doesn't have the winning mentality we need.
Mezeker Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Alex is a bottler, grade A choker but he is young and from reports has a decent head on his shoulders. I think we should give it a go. None have the composure of mahrez, but they do have pace.As cast offs, they will fit in with the others at our club.Problem with Walcott and ox is wages and price. alex is on 55k, Walcott is the problem.
Bluetintedspecs Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Looking forward to this thread being revisited in the future if we sign him
Bluetintedspecs Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Trying to work out who, academically, is the most intelligent player we have ever had. I think that John O'Neill had a degree, and I think that Alan Smith was studying at Coventry Poly when he joined us. Fuchs gives me the impression that he's a bright lad, and I believe that Inler speaks a few languages. Smudger has 10 O levels and 3 A levels I believe very bright chap!
filbertstreet Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 pretty sure jeff schlupp's got a few doctorates that he won at a funfair
SheppyFox Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Arsenal fans are all laughing at us begging us to take them saying we'll have Mahrez off your hands. We can find much cheaper talent elsewhere. These two have been nothing but useless for most of their careers and they will not fit into our team. We need to build not ****ing dismantle just because we won the prem. You're all mental honestly. I think if our management and scout team see something in the lads then you're a silly sausage for questioning them
ealingfox Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Whats funny? I literally can't think of a single player in the Premier League who is less suited to our team ethic, our existing personnel and our style of play.
Mezeker Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Whats funny? I literally can't think of a single player in the Premier League who is less suited to our team ethic, our existing personnel and our style of play. fine but i would take him in a heartbeat, when you talk about players of that quality who gives a shit about team ethic and style of play, if you get a player like Ozil, you fit him in or change or style of play. And to say Ozil can not play without the ball is disrespectful, i watched him at Real and he played some of the best counter attacking football i have ever seen. To expand on this, you would not take post injury Ronaldo? As in El Phenomeno?
filbertstreet Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 fine but i would take him in a heartbeat, when you talk about players of that quality who gives a shit about team ethic and style of play, if you get a player like Ozil, you fit him in or change or style of play. And to say Ozil can not play without the ball is disrespectful, i watched him at Real and he played some of the best counter attacking football i have ever seen. To expand on this, you would not take post injury Ronaldo? As in El Phenomeno? leicester is a team, not a group of individuals - thats why they won the premier league, getting in world class mercenaries isn't going to make that better is it
katieakita Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Marc Albrighton was 24 when he was shown the door at Villa. where he played 86 league games in 6 seasons., he has played 56 times for us and now looks settled, If our back room guys see something in him what is not to like.
Guest Mee-9 Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 That 'i'd rather have redmond' comment is worse than the Kermo was decent one.
Strokes Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 fine but i would take him in a heartbeat, when you talk about players of that quality who gives a shit about team ethic and style of play, if you get a player like Ozil, you fit him in or change or style of play. And to say Ozil can not play without the ball is disrespectful, i watched him at Real and he played some of the best counter attacking football i have ever seen. To expand on this, you would not take post injury Ronaldo? As in El Phenomeno?Why would you change a style that is proven to accommodate anyone? You are talking shit.
Mezeker Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Why would you change a style that is proven to accommodate anyone? You are talking shit. Cause its ****ing Ozil, if i need to explain that then....AND as mentioned above Ozil can play in in style having done so with Madrid in a team that could play in many different ways.
Strokes Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 Cause its ****ing Ozil, if i need to explain that then....AND as mentioned above Ozil can play in in style having done so with Madrid in a team that could play in many different ways.We have won the title for the first time in 132 years, I don't want us to change our style to accommodate anyone. If I need to explain that.......
Mezeker Posted 22 May 2016 Posted 22 May 2016 leicester is a team, not a group of individuals - thats why they won the premier league, getting in world class mercenaries isn't going to make that better is it Ozil a mercenary? haha, some of you on here seem to be living in a utopian bubble. Many of you on this forum highly overestimate the quality of some of the players on this team as well as their commitment to the team.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.