HankMarvin Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3756867/Leicester-enemies-Europe-Bayern-Munich-s-David-Alaba-reveals-wary-facing-Claudio-Ranieri-s-Europe.html
Wakeyfox Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 The daily fail. "Bayern could meet Leicester in the group stages" Erm, no.
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 Quote There is, though, the possibility their paths will cross again. The Champions League draw will be watched with keener anticipation than normal on Thursday to see what assignments Claudio Ranieri's men will be handed. Yes, but the chances aren't that big yet. Also, why do publications still persist on using our OLD badge?
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 5 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: Yes, but the chances aren't that big yet. Also, why do publications still persist on using our OLD badge? Big? I'd say the chances of us meeting Bayern in the groups is non existent.
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 Just now, Facecloth said: Big? I'd say the chances of us meeting Bayern in the groups is non existent. I referred to the statement I quoted, which clearly indicates the possibility of a potential meeting past the group stages - which isn't very likely yet.
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 Just now, MC Prussian said: I referred to the statement I quoted, which clearly indicates the possibility of a potential meeting past the group stages - which isn't very likely yet. The statement you quoted doesn't mention anything at all about meeting past the group stages
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 16 minutes ago, Facecloth said: The statement you quoted doesn't mention anything at all about meeting past the group stages Then I suggest you read it again and tell me it's not the least implied ("the possibility their paths will cross again").
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 1 minute ago, MC Prussian said: Then I suggest you read it again and tell me it's not the least implied ("the possibility their paths will cross again"). How on earth does that imply meeting in the knockout stages?
Beliall Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 31 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: Yes, but the chances aren't that big yet. Also, why do publications still persist on using our OLD badge? Becasue Leicester fans are the only ones who can tell the difference, like the parents of twins, only we can tell them apart
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 17 minutes ago, Facecloth said: How on earth does that imply meeting in the knockout stages? I'll leave you with that one to figure out yourself until 5 to 6pm tonight.
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 2 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: I'll leave you with that one to figure out yourself until 5 to 6pm tonight. All it's doing is saying the players could cross paths again. It makes no reference to the stage of the competition. It doesn't imply at all, let alone clearly imply, about meeting in the knockout stages.
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 12 minutes ago, Facecloth said: All it's doing is saying the players could cross paths again. It makes no reference to the stage of the competition. It doesn't imply at all, let alone clearly imply, about meeting in the knockout stages. It does in the context of the article.
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 3 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: It does in the context of the article. 16 minutes ago, Facecloth said: All it's doing is saying the players could cross paths again. It makes no reference to the stage of the competition. It doesn't imply at all, let alone clearly imply, about meeting in the knockout stages. 21 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: I'll leave you with that one to figure out yourself until 5 to 6pm tonight. 39 minutes ago, Facecloth said: How on earth does that imply meeting in the knockout stages? Worst argument ever.
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 27 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: It does in the context of the article. Well it doesn't. And even if it did you took it out its context, so it wasn't clearly implying it anymore
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 31 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Worst argument ever. I somehow miss the years on here between 2004 and 2012ish.
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 11 minutes ago, Facecloth said: Well it doesn't. And even if it did you took it out its context, so it wasn't clearly implying it anymore
Jimothy Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 30 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: Am I wrong? No. Stop trying to look smart when you're clearly not
foxy boxing Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 i doubt w'ell meet bayern until the final, he'll be really nervous then?
MC Prussian Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 5 minutes ago, Facecloth said: Am I wrong? No. Stop trying to look smart when you're clearly not Am I wrong? No. Adding s is the way forward, I see.
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 3 minutes ago, AKCJ said: I thought I had some shit arguments Terrible. Prussian is right anyway "their paths could cross again" as it doesn't mention a stage it means in the competition as a whole which obviously includes both group stage and knockout stage. But yeah, who gives a shit anyway.
Tuna Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 Who is David Alba, Jessica Alba's husband? Why are there no pics of Jessica in here?
LinekersApples Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 Please close thread and save anyone else from reading through it (as I just unfortunately did)
kingcarr21 Posted 25 August 2016 Posted 25 August 2016 5 minutes ago, LinekersApples said: Please close thread and save anyone else from reading through it (as I just unfortunately did) You typing in here brought the thread back to the top which meant I hav now opened it and read it. So I blame you. Dick. Which i I have now done to someone else
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.