Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Collymore

Adrien Silva

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, rmahrez said:

Seems like a great solution for both sides. Get it done.

 

5 minutes ago, SCP4Ever said:

 

 

That's being called as stupid bullshit over here, as we "only" have 80% of both players, so a package deal for one wouldn't get us more money, we'd just give it to someone else.

 

 

 

given what has been said about corruption over there though, is it feasible that a deal is being struck with one of the 3rd parties(relating to Silva) to reduce their % cut so both parties win at the expense of the other 3rd party(Slimani) losing out.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Grewks said:

They don't have to pay £3 million more...and therefore we get him for £3 million less.

Or they just get 3 million (more likely)

Posted
4 minutes ago, artursteppe said:

Yeh, maybe you are right, but their owner is a bit of a tit, so when he suggests someting like that, that we don't care about, we say 'yeh, good idea, let's do it'.

 

Oh yeah granted.

 

I don't get why Rudkin is getting businessman of the year for it that's all lol 

Posted
2 minutes ago, GaelicFox said:

This is all utter madness 

 

quite honestly rudders has lost the plot ! 

 

 

Time will tell how this works out but I'm not comfortable 

 

i sense someone is trying to put the biggest mistake in clubs history (giving Kante a stupid release clause) right by this silva signing 

 

all seems to be mental 

Emmental? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, FireFox said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/50h8d7/adrien_and_slimani_will_be_sold_in_a_bundle_to/d73ysrr

 

Don't know any more than you, but one Sporting fan on reddit thinks differently.

 

He's misinformed. In fact, a benfica supporter points out after, Adrien Silva owns 20% of his economic rights. What could happen is he waives his cut in order to make the deal easier.

3 minutes ago, TripAdvisor said:

Sporting has 100% of Adrien's rights. I'm sure about that.

I think you're wrong there, mate:

http://desporto.sapo.pt/futebol/primeira_liga/artigo/2016/03/12/sporting-recomprou-30-por-cento-do-passe-de-adrien-e-17-5-do-de-rui-patricio

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SCP4Ever said:

 

He's misinformed. In fact, a benfica supporter points out after, Adrien Silva owns 20% of his economic rights. What could happen is he waives his cut in order to make the deal easier.

I think you're wrong there, mate:

http://desporto.sapo.pt/futebol/primeira_liga/artigo/2016/03/12/sporting-recomprou-30-por-cento-do-passe-de-adrien-e-17-5-do-de-rui-patricio

 

That happened in February. In April Sporting said we had the 100%.

Guest MattP
Posted
27 minutes ago, Master Fox said:

Makes Kante going to Chelsea for £32 million seem like chump change. What a bargain they got. 

In hindsight it was a huge ass raping we got there, he's worth double that.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Bagworthblue said:

it depends. If I sold  player with a future sell on clause I would insist that the future sale is linked to market rate. Not sure how in practice but there would be a way of protecting an asset that you still have an interest in. I'm sure we have a lawyer on here that would have a view

Market rate is too subjective. There is no scale of what players are worth. it is all down to what the buying Club is prepared to pay and what the selling Club is prepared to accept.. I cannot see how this could prompt a legal case.

Posted
16 minutes ago, GaelicFox said:

This is all utter madness 

 

quite honestly rudders has lost the plot ! 

 

 

Time will tell how this works out but I'm not comfortable 

 

i sense someone is trying to put the biggest mistake in clubs history (giving Kante a stupid release clause) right by this silva signing 

 

all seems to be mental 

 

Been watching a lot of Sporting games then? Don't rate him that highly?

Posted
3 minutes ago, TripAdvisor said:

That happened in February. In April Sporting said we had the 100%.

You sure? I can't find anything anywhere about that. There's the stuff about the other 50%, but I can't find those last 20. Did it happen when he extended his contract?

Posted
5 minutes ago, MattP said:

In hindsight it was a huge ass raping we got there, he's worth double that.

It was but there was nothing we could do about it - Kante wanted out, if we'd have sold him to a CL team we'd have only got £20m, so Chelsea's offer was as good as we could hope for. Fvcking release clauses

Posted
1 minute ago, SCP4Ever said:

You sure? I can't find anything anywhere about that. There's the stuff about the other 50%, but I can't find those last 20. Did it happen when he extended his contract?

That's what has been said in Sporting's forum.

We bought 30% of his rights and we only renewed his contract unless we would also get 20% from him. Thats why Sporting posted a picture saying we got Adrien's 100% rights in April. I understand things like "We didn't receive any offer for him from Leicester" to be a lie but why would Sporting lie about this?

 

12932755_10153388211831555_4403727130969

 

Why would we be honest about some players rights and lie about others? That doesn't make sense.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Haydos said:

 

Been watching a lot of Sporting games then? Don't rate him that highly?

If you don't think this is all a bit scary then good luck to you 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...