Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Strokes said:

Jigaboos, Christ I’ve not heard that since I was a kid.

I thought that was the slur Cheryl Cole used when she assaulted that woman in the bogs or whatever it was she did.

 

None of your new fangled racism round here lads, keep it pre war

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Jigaboos, Christ I’ve not heard that since I was a kid.

 

I had to google it, which is odd as it's an archaic term, and I'm older than you.

 

How did you become exposed to it?

Posted

I think Tess is probably already calling it a coconut brexit, in her own mind at least if not to her wheaty little mates. Hard on the outside, soft on the inside. The detail of the softness just complicated enough so that brexiters can't be bothered to read it, or couldn't understand it even if they did. Hard enough so that they get to live out their chest thumpy, taking back control, "i am basically Winston Churchill" fantasy. Remainers will look at it rationally, intelligently, as they always do, and come away thinking it's not nearly as bad as it could have been. Everybody will be sort of happy. Not a lot will change, we'll all just be a little bit poorer.

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

I had to google it, which is odd as it's an archaic term, and I'm older than you.

 

How did you become exposed to it?

When we kids their were 4 of us that knocked about together, our mate from Jamaica (I think) was adopted with a white family. The older lads on the park at the end of the street used to call him it. Tbf our favourite game at the time was playing the A Team and he still was always BA Baracus but I don’t think we really understood what racism even was. I’d let him be Hannibal if he wanted to play now.

Edited by Strokes
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Strokes said:

When we kids their were 4 of us that knocked about together, our mate from Jamaica I think was adopted with a white family. The older lads on the park at the end of the street used to call him it. Tbf our favourite game at the time was playing the A Team and he still was always BA Baracus but I don’t think we really understood what racism even was. I’d let him be Hannibal if he wanted to play now.

 

Where did you grow up?

Posted

Used to be a horse in Australia called Jigaboo, sure it ran in the Cox plate.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Narborough 

 

Oh, right.

 

According to my dictionary of etymology it's a North American term dating back to 1909. I guess the boys in question probably picked it up from their grandfathers, who in turn may have picked it up from American servicemen during one of the World wars.

 

That would also tie in with me having not come across it because I never knew either of my grandfathers.

Edited by Buce
Posted
Just now, Buce said:

 

Oh, right.

 

According to my dictionary of etymology it's a North American term dating back to 1909. I guess the boys in question probably picked it up from their grandfathers, who in turn may have picked it up from American servicemen during one of the World wars.

Possibly, or could be TV. It would be early 80s?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

Oh, right.

 

According to my dictionary of etymology it's a North American term dating back to 1909. I guess the boys in question probably picked it up from their grandfathers, who in turn may have picked it up from American servicemen during one of the World wars.

I know my dad knew what it meant because I asked him at the time.

Posted
1 minute ago, Strokes said:

Possibly, or could be TV. It would be early 80s?

 

Maybe, but then I would have probably been aware of it.

 

Were we still using terms that offensive in broadcasting in the 80's?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Strokes said:

I know my dad knew what it meant because I asked him at the time.

 

When was his father born?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

Maybe, but then I would have probably been aware of it.

 

Were we still using terms that offensive in broadcasting in the 80's?

No idea I was just guessing really.

Posted (edited)

 

Government 'too slow' preparing for Brexit.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/government-has-been-too-slow-in-preparing-for-brexit

 

Business leader warn May "Our patience is running out over Brexit".

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/business-leaders-warn-may-our-patience-over-brexit-is-running-out

 

Brexit could cut manufactoring exports by a third: Many Leave voting areas to be hardest hit.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/brexit-manufacturing-exports-leave

 

What a fvcking mess.

 

#takingbackcontrol

Edited by Buce
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

Business leader warn May "Our patience is running out over Brexit".

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/business-leaders-warn-may-our-patience-over-brexit-is-running-out

 

Brexit could cut manufactoring exports by a third: Many Leave voting areas to be hardest hit.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/brexit-manufacturing-exports-leave

 

What a fvcking mess.

 

#takingbackcontrol

The trouble is, immigration has been painted as bad for us but is a primary reason for our growth. As a nation we're terrible at investment in tech within business and therefore the way we have increased productivity is to have more workers. If they leave productivity will fall and we'll end up in the recession that was feared.

 

Likewise, taking back control means taking a huge step into the unknown. At a point where the rest of the world is seeing increasing growth ours is poor. Putting in place our own free trade deals will take years during which living standards are at further risk.

 

Perversely, the stock market falls of recent days were due to increasing wages in the US leading to the markets fearing rate rises. How different are things in the uk with our falling wages? 

Edited by Guest
Posted
11 hours ago, Rogstanley said:

I think Tess is probably already calling it a coconut brexit, in her own mind at least if not to her wheaty little mates. Hard on the outside, soft on the inside. The detail of the softness just complicated enough so that brexiters can't be bothered to read it, or couldn't understand it even if they did. Hard enough so that they get to live out their chest thumpy, taking back control, "i am basically Winston Churchill" fantasy. Remainers will look at it rationally, intelligently, as they always do, and come away thinking it's not nearly as bad as it could have been. Everybody will be sort of happy. Not a lot will change, we'll all just be a little bit poorer.

 

Top post.

 

This deserves at least 3 rep points:

- 1 for the "coconut Brexit" concept

- 1 for the "wheaty little mates" epithet

- 1 for highlighting the superior intelligence of Remainers

 

lol

Posted (edited)

Another "watch this terrible thing happen if we vote for Brexit" myth shattered.

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/foreign-students-apply-to-uk-in-record-numbers-3msxsff8z

 

Quote

The number of foreign students applying to British universities has hit a high, despite warnings about the impact of the Brexit vote on higher education.

More than 100,000 EU and overseas candidates have applied to take up places this autumn, the first official figures for the year show today. This will be welcomed by institutions, which are facing a 2.5 per cent drop in the number of 18-year-olds in Britain compared with last year, resulting in unprecedented numbers of unconditional offers to candidates of all abilities.

 

 

Over and over again they spread a scare story, it does not come true and they never come back and say anything about it, they just move on to the next one before that gets disproved.

 

 

Meanwhile, the EU again leaking threats.

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/we-will-use-sanctions-to-punish-you-during-brexit-transition-says-brussels-vfwcfswdc

 

Quote

 

Brussels is demanding that Theresa May submit to powers allowing the European Union to ground flights, suspend single market access and impose trade tariffs on the UK during the Brexit transition period.

Under the proposals, the EU would have unprecedented legal powers — without the oversight of European courts — to punish Britain unilaterally if it breached the terms of the transition.

The prime minister has also been warned by Brussels that she must make a legal commitment to prevent a hard border in Northern Ireland within weeks or the EU will “stall” Brexit trade and transition talks. Both issues are expected to be discussed by ministers today when the cabinet’s Brexit sub-committee meets to try to reach agreement on the next stage of negotiations.

 

 

Don't believe a word of it again, it's classic tactics I've already seen and read about in the Varoufakis book on negotiating with these people, as he says, they'll threaten something through the press, then come to a negotiation in the actual talks, then make a conciliatory speech patronising the opponents - then the supporters of the club are think they have behaved properly and been reasonable when the opposite is the case. Can't believe anyone still falls for this.

They are so desperate for us to stay it's embarrassing, reminds me of a jilted ex-girlfriend.

 

Edited by MattP
Posted

I've mentioned this before but Brexiteers need to put trade right at the forefront of arguments, way ahead of migration.

 

There is huge support for us to be doing our own trade deals with the World and very little support for remaining tied to the Customs Union if it blocks us from doing the former.

 

Please keep making this point, it resonates. 

 

 

Screenshot_2018-02-07-08-54-19.png

Posted
18 minutes ago, MattP said:

I've mentioned this before but Brexiteers need to put trade right at the forefront of arguments, way ahead of migration.

 

There is huge support for us to be doing our own trade deals with the World and very little support for remaining tied to the Customs Union if it blocks us from doing the former.

 

Please keep making this point, it resonates. 

 

 

Screenshot_2018-02-07-08-54-19.png

 

So 61% admit they have no fvcking idea what they were voting on.

 

#takingbackcontrol

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Buce said:

So 61% admit they have no fvcking idea what they were voting on.

 

#takingbackcontrol

Which furthers my point. Of those who do know most seem to favour what we were putting forward, how many Remain voters went to the polls not knowing that being in the Customs Union stopped our own country doing it's own trade deals? Let alone things like enforcing tariffs.

 

It could be millions, that poll seems to suggest most who understand it are prepared to sacrifice the CU if it means we can go out into the wider World and engage more with rapidly growing economies when t is actually explained to them.

 

#takingbackcontrol absolutely.

Edited by MattP
Posted
2 hours ago, Buce said:

 

So 61% admit they have no fvcking idea what they were voting on.

 

#takingbackcontrol

I have no doubt whatsoever that less than about 10% of those asked even understand the first question. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...