Harvey Barnes

[HighPeakFox]

Just now, UniFox21 said:

 

But this isn't about your stupid money analogy. You're frankly taking the numbers you see and twisting it to fit your point. 

I liked how he rodded the political insult in for good measure too. That would be very banworthy were someone to say something rude about a Tory voter.

[jaylcfc94]

1 minute ago, HighPeakFox said:

I liked how he rodded the political insult in for good measure too. That would be very banworthy were someone to say something rude about a Tory voter.

i just asked if the person was corbyn because he seems to think if you have £89 you can buy something worth £90.

 

its corbynism. 

Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94

[HighPeakFox]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

i just asked if the person was corbyn because he seems to think if you have £89 you can buy something worth £90.

 

its corbynism. 

It isn't, and it's totally irrelevant here. Get in the bin.

[UniFox21]

2 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

twisting? no i’m saying 6.9 is not 7. it is 6. the clue is in the numbers. 

 

So here are his ratings from whoscored, who use facts and contributions rather than the opinions of a group of Leicester fans. Average of 6.96, which isn't '6 or lower'. He's clearly a key player in our side, his lowest performances when he's been introduced. 

[UniFox21]

9 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

I liked how he rodded the political insult in for good measure too. That would be very banworthy were someone to say something rude about a Tory voter.

Yup tried to ignore that as I'm not getting into a political debate in a Barnes thread. No need for him to bring it up. Funny how he's throwing anything in to avoid the main topic

[jaylcfc94]

2 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

 

So here are his ratings from whoscored, who use facts and contributions rather than the opinions of a group of Leicester fans. Average of 6.96, which isn't '6 or lower'. He's clearly a key player in our side, his lowest performances when he's been introduced. 

yes so like i said he has the lowest score of any outfield player who’s played a lot of minutes 

[jaylcfc94]

he’s not a key player lol. he’s a glaring weakness, over the course of season according to that site he’s our lowest rated outfield player who’s played substantial minutes .

[jaylcfc94]

awaits for @UniFox21to say the site he suggested is now rubbish after saying it has more accurate data  

[UniFox21]

5 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

yes so like i said he has the lowest score of any outfield player who’s played a lot of minutes 

 

4 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

he’s not a key player lol. he’s a glaring weakness, over the course of season according to that site he’s our lowest rated outfield player who’s played substantial minutes .

 

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

awaits for @UniFox21to say the site he suggested is now rubbish after saying it has more accurate data  

He is the lowest rated outfield player, I'm not questioning that. I'm questioning you calling him a weakness and our worst player. 

He has the same contributions as Perez, who is rated 0.03 more, i don't see you berating the player who cost £30million? The guys in his first full prem season and has 5 contributions by December. I'm all for constructive criticism, but this is you with an agenda.

[HighPeakFox]

22 is the new old. You heard it here first.

 

Said a 49 year old...

[StanSP]

Just now, HighPeakFox said:

22 is the new old. You heard it here first.

 

Said a 49 year old...

yeah but you're actually 40.

[Unabomber]

6.9 is closer to 7 than it is 6

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, StanSP said:

yeah but you're actually 40.

nope he’s had his 40th birthday. not his 50th. 

[Unabomber]

12 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

awaits for @UniFox21to say the site he suggested is now rubbish after saying it has more accurate data  

Do you even support Leicester? You seem to really dislike Barnes which is just weird.

[HighPeakFox]

1 minute ago, StanSP said:

yeah but you're actually 40.

dammit, you've proved him right...

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, Unabomber said:

6.9 is closer to 7 than it is 6

it’s part of 6

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, Unabomber said:

Do you even support Leicester? You seem to really dislike Barnes which is just weird.

yes season ticket and some away games 

[Unabomber]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

it’s part of 6

I didn’t say 6.9 is not a part of 6 I said 6.9 is closer to 7 than it is 6. My comment is indisputable. 

[HighPeakFox]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

yes season ticket and some away games 

I have an idea. Tell us about who you like, and why. This might help shift things for the better.

[Unabomber]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

yes season ticket and some away games 

So surely you would have seen when Barnes has played well this season? 

[jaylcfc94]

1 minute ago, Unabomber said:

I didn’t say 6.9 is not a part of 6 I said 6.9 is closer to 7 than it is 6. My comment is indisputable. 

so i was right then he gets 6 or lower consistent ly

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, Unabomber said:

So surely you would have seen when Barnes has played well this season? 

one game 

[jaylcfc94]

1 minute ago, HighPeakFox said:

I have an idea. Tell us about who you like, and why. This might help shift things for the better.

my favourite player is vardy 

[MPH]

1 hour ago, jaylcfc94 said:

 

You are saying because vardy scored at lower levels and translates that to prem then so can barnes 

 

I am saying vardy is a very rare case and the odds of barnes emulating him are very small 

 

no, i am saying that if someone can finish they don’t lose that ability to finish. they possibly lose form, lack confidence, ect

[UniFox21]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

so i was right then he gets 6 or lower consistent ly

Can you only count to 6? Would make a lot of sense that anything above 6 is a scary number you can't understand