Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

people speak as if he’s 18 and a young boy in a mans  game. he’s not.. he’s 22. 

 

He has 113 senior appearances to his name. 

22 is still young ffs.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, HighPeakFox said:

Sure, but loads at Championship level, and we know that doesn't count the same, right?

He has over 100 appearances at senior level and some fans are still saying he needs to learn the basics...  

Posted
Just now, MPH said:

why take the chance on vardy when he was only proven to score non league?

 

 

 

people CAN make the step up... and even vardy struggled to the point he almost gave up footy.. did he stop being able to finish in that time or was he off form? low on confidence? trying too hard?

So you are comparing one extreme example to the hundreds of others who haven’t. 

 

Would you place £500 on that bet at 300/1? 

Posted
1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

It’s not 

To be fair you can't count or work out averages so when it comes to numbers I'm not going to engage with you lol 

Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

To be fair you can't count or work out averages so when it comes to numbers I'm not going to engage with you lol 

 

Well you lied because you missed out the lowest... 4.8

Posted
1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

 

Well you lied because you missed out the lowest... 4.8

Even if I did, his average comes down to 6.6. 

 

You said he 'consistently gets ratings lower than 6' which is just not true.

 

Ergo, you can't count.

 

Here - beginner Maths courses for you if you want to take this up :) https://leicestercollege.ac.uk/course/maths-functional-skills-adult-2019-20-p0181-english-and-maths/

Posted
4 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

So you are comparing one extreme example to the hundreds of others who haven’t. 

 

Would you place £500 on that bet at 300/1? 

 

 

what relevance does your point even have? lol

 

all i’m discussion isn’t wether Harvey is able to finish and wether you lose that ability to finish- you don’t.

Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

Even if I did, his average comes down to 6.6. 

 

You said he 'consistently gets ratings lower than 6' which is just not true.

 

Ergo, you can't count.

 

Here - beginner Maths courses for you if you want to take this up :) https://leicestercollege.ac.uk/course/maths-functional-skills-adult-2019-20-p0181-english-and-maths/

 

I said if you look at averages across the season of anyone who’s played frequent minutes he would be the lowest 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, MPH said:

 

 

what relevance does your point even have? lol

 

all i’m discussion isn’t wether Harvey is able to finish and wether you lose that ability to finish- you don’t.

 

You are saying because vardy scored at lower levels and translates that to prem then so can barnes 

 

I am saying vardy is a very rare case and the odds of barnes emulating him are very small 

Edited by jaylcfc94
Posted
Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

 

You are saying because vardy scored at lower levels and translates that to prem then so can barnes 

That isn't what he's saying, but your thinking is too obtuse to allow the point he's trying to make through.

Posted
2 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

 

I said if you look at averages across the season of anyone who’s played frequent minutes he would be the lowest 

you said this:

 

1 hour ago, jaylcfc94 said:

It’s not. 

 

He’s consistently rated a 6 or lower which given how we have been doing is very low ...4.3 yesterday

This is untrue.

 

Posted
Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

Yes I said a 6 or a lower. can’t you read? 

Yes. That's not true though. I listed all the ratings and out of those, plus yesterday, he's only done that twice.

 

How is that consistent lol? Do you know the meaning of the word?

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Yes. That's not true though. I listed all the ratings and out of those, plus yesterday, he's only done that twice.

 

How is that consistent lol? Do you know the meaning of the word?

vs Villa - 6.6 (25min sub app)

vs Watford - 7.2 (joint 3rd)

vs Everton - 6.6 (joint 5th)

vs Brighton - 6.7 (joint 6th)

vs Arsenal - 6.6 (lowest)

vs Palace - 6.4 (joint lowest)

vs Burton - 6.8 (joint 3rd)

vs Southampton - 9.3 (joint 4th)

vs Burnley - 6.5 (joint 7th)

vs Liverpool - 5.3 (9th)

vs Newcastle - 6.9 (7th)

vs Tottenham - 6.7 (joint 7th)

 

So all this is not consistently 6 or lower? Only 2 of them is above what i said .. and you missed out 4.8 yesterday 

Edited by jaylcfc94
Posted
2 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

vs Villa - 6.6 (25min sub app)

vs Watford - 7.2 (joint 3rd)

vs Everton - 6.6 (joint 5th)

vs Brighton - 6.7 (joint 6th)

vs Arsenal - 6.6 (lowest)

vs Palace - 6.4 (joint lowest)

vs Burton - 6.8 (joint 3rd)

vs Southampton - 9.3 (joint 4th)

vs Burnley - 6.5 (joint 7th)

vs Liverpool - 5.3 (9th)

vs Newcastle - 6.9 (7th)

vs Tottenham - 6.7 (joint 7th)

 

So all this is not consistently 6 or lower? Only 2 of them is above what i said .. and you missed out 4.8 yesterday 

He's had 2 above 6 and 2 below 6, he's an average of a decent 6 rating.

 

You should be aware, however, stats don't describe everything about football.   

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

He's had 2 above 6 and 2 below 6, he's an average of a decent 6 rating.

 

You should be aware, however, stats don't describe everything about football.   

 

So i was right then... I said 6 or lower. 

 

6 goes up to 6.9. Then 7 starts at 7.0...

 

Edited by jaylcfc94
Posted
4 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

vs Villa - 6.6 (25min sub app)

vs Watford - 7.2 (joint 3rd)

vs Everton - 6.6 (joint 5th)

vs Brighton - 6.7 (joint 6th)

vs Arsenal - 6.6 (lowest)

vs Palace - 6.4 (joint lowest)

vs Burton - 6.8 (joint 3rd)

vs Southampton - 9.3 (joint 4th)

vs Burnley - 6.5 (joint 7th)

vs Liverpool - 5.3 (9th)

vs Newcastle - 6.9 (7th)

vs Tottenham - 6.7 (joint 7th)

 

So all this is not consistently 6 or lower? Only 2 of them is above what i said .. and you missed out 4.8 yesterday 

Most of them are closer to 7 than 6.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...