UniFox21 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, jaylcfc94 said: So i was right then... I said 6 or lower. 6 goes up to 6.9. Then 7 starts at 7.0... Well no you aren't right? He has equal above 6 as he does below, so he's averaging at decent 6. Not "6 and below" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPeakFox Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said: 6 goes up to 6.9 These go up to 11. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 (edited) Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said: What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Answer the question. 6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. If you have £89 you have £80 not £90 Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, jaylcfc94 said: 6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. If you have £89 you have £80 not £90 Answer the question. Which is it closer to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UniFox21 Posted 15 December 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 15 December 2019 1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said: 6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. If you have £89 you have £80 not £90 No, you have £89 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, UniFox21 said: No, you have £89 Yes but not enough to buy something worth £90. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said: Answer the question. Which is it closer to? Well I suggest you go to a shop and say can I buy something worth £200 for £151 and see whether they’re happy with that. Did you vote labour by any chance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, jaylcfc94 said: Well I suggest you go to a shop and say can I buy something worth £200 for £151 and see whether they’re happy with that. Did you vote labour by any chance Sorry to go all Paxman on you but you are evading the question. What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Is it too hard for your tiny brain to comprehend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said: Yes but not enough to buy something worth £90. What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 7 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: Most of them are closer to 7 than 6. You would be a great labour leader - are you corbyn? yes that’s right kids if you have 2.51 you can go into a shop and buy something worth £5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said: Sorry to go all Paxman on you but you are evading the question. What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Is it too hard for your tiny brain to comprehend? 6.9 is part of 6. Not 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, jaylcfc94 said: You would be a great labour leader - are you corbyn? yes that’s right kids if you have 2.51 you can go into a shop and buy something worth £5. Where have I said that? God, you are as thick as pigshit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, UniFox21 said: What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point So you can walk into a shop with £2.51 and buy something worth £5 because it’s closer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said: Where have I said that? God, you are as thick as pigshit. 6.9 is not 7. Just because a number is closer doesn’t mean it’s not a 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, jaylcfc94 said: 6.9 is not 7. Just because a number is closer doesn’t mean it’s not a 6. You're just being a troll now. See ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 3 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point well you think 6.9 is not a 6. the clue is in the numbers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest An Sionnach Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said: 6.9 is part of 6. Not 7. On here we don't attempt to beat each other to death with our arguments, your point is made so calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: You're just being a troll now. See ya. what? it’s clearly in the numbers if you decide to not see it you are the one trolling. 6.9 is 6. Not 7. It doesn’t matter whether it’s closer. If I have £89 (8.9) I can’t buy something worth £90 (9.0). Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmayne7 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Hahahahahaha. This thread. Quite entertaining to see something that isn't opinion based and just factual. And one of those parties being so blind to the fact they are wrong. Keep it up guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, dmayne7 said: Hahahahahaha. This thread. Quite entertaining to see something that isn't opinion based and just factual. And one of those parties being so blind to the fact they are wrong. Keep it up guys. so 6.9 is not 6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammo Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 This must be like Robbie Savage and Chris Sutton down the pub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 (edited) Just now, Hammo said: This must be like Robbie Savage and Chris Sutton down the pub. apart from the fact i am right. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 all these are part of 6. Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raj Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Well this thread is definitely entertainment!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 5 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said: So you can walk into a shop with £2.51 and buy something worth £5 because it’s closer? 3 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said: well you think 6.9 is not a 6. the clue is in the numbers... But this isn't about your stupid money analogy. You're frankly taking the numbers you see and twisting it to fit your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylcfc94 Posted 15 December 2019 Share Posted 15 December 2019 Just now, UniFox21 said: But this isn't about your stupid money analogy. You're frankly taking the numbers you see and twisting it to fit your point. twisting? no i’m saying 6.9 is not 7. it is 6. the clue is in the numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts