Harvey Barnes

[UniFox21]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

 

So i was right then... I said 6 or lower. 

 

6 goes up to 6.9. Then 7 starts at 7.0...

 

Well no you aren't right? He has equal above 6 as he does below, so he's averaging at decent 6. Not "6 and below"

[HighPeakFox]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

6 goes up to 6.9 

These go up to 11.

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said:

What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Answer the question.

6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. 

 

If you have £89 you have £80 not £90

Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94

[SouthStandUpperTier]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. 

 

If you have £89 you have £80 not £90

Answer the question. Which is it closer to?

[UniFox21]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

6.9 is 6. It’s not 7. 

 

If you have £89 you have £80 not £90

No, you have £89

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, UniFox21 said:

No, you have £89

Yes but not enough to buy something worth £90.

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Answer the question. Which is it closer to?

 

Well I suggest you go to a shop and say can I buy something worth £200 for £151 and see whether they’re happy with that. 

 

Did you vote labour by  any chance 

[SouthStandUpperTier]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

 

Well I suggest you go to a shop and say can I buy something worth £200 for £151 and see whether they’re happy with that. 

 

Did you vote labour by  any chance 

Sorry to go all Paxman on you but you are evading the question. What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Is it too hard for your tiny brain to comprehend?

[UniFox21]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

Yes but not enough to buy something worth £90.

What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. 

 

Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point 

[jaylcfc94]

7 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Most of them are closer to 7 than 6.

You would be a great labour leader - are you corbyn? yes that’s right kids if you have 2.51 you can go into a shop and buy something worth £5. 

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Sorry to go all Paxman on you but you are evading the question. What is 6.9 closer to? 6 or 7? Is it too hard for your tiny brain to comprehend?

6.9 is part of 6. Not 7. 

[SouthStandUpperTier]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

You would be a great labour leader - are you corbyn? yes that’s right kids if you have 2.51 you can go into a shop and buy something worth £5. 

Where have I said that? God, you are as thick as pigshit.

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, UniFox21 said:

What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. 

 

Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point 

So you can walk into a shop with £2.51 and buy something worth £5 because it’s closer? 

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Where have I said that? God, you are as thick as pigshit.

6.9 is not 7. Just because a number is closer doesn’t mean it’s not a 6. 

[SouthStandUpperTier]

Just now, jaylcfc94 said:

6.9 is not 7. Just because a number is closer doesn’t mean it’s not a 6. 

You're just being a troll now. See ya.

[jaylcfc94]

3 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

What you're doing is known as confirmation bias. You know what you're looking for and interpreting anything you see as proof of what you want to prove. 

 

Normally, your point would be thrown out until you can prove otherwise, so off you pop until you can actually support your point 

well you think 6.9 is not a 6. the clue is in the numbers...

[Guest An Sionnach]

1 minute ago, jaylcfc94 said:

6.9 is part of 6. Not 7. 

On here we don't attempt to beat each other to death with our arguments, your point is made so calm down.

[jaylcfc94]

1 minute ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

You're just being a troll now. See ya.

what? it’s clearly in the numbers if you decide to not see it you are the one trolling. 

 

6.9 is 6. Not 7. It doesn’t matter whether it’s closer. 

 

If I have £89 (8.9) I can’t buy something worth £90 (9.0). 

Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94

[dmayne7]

Hahahahahaha.

 

This thread. Quite entertaining to see something that isn't opinion based and just factual. And one of those parties being so blind to the fact they are wrong.

 

Keep it up guys.

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, dmayne7 said:

Hahahahahaha.

 

This thread. Quite entertaining to see something that isn't opinion based and just factual. And one of those parties being so blind to the fact they are wrong.

 

Keep it up guys.

so 6.9 is not 6?

[Hammo]

This must be like Robbie Savage and Chris Sutton down the pub.

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, Hammo said:

This must be like Robbie Savage and Chris Sutton down the pub.

apart from the fact i am right. 

 

6.0 

6.1

6.2

6.3

6.4

6.5

6.6

6.7

6.8

6.9

 

all these are part of 6. 

Edited 15 December 2019 by jaylcfc94

[Raj]

Well this thread is definitely entertainment!!!

[UniFox21]

5 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

So you can walk into a shop with £2.51 and buy something worth £5 because it’s closer? 

 

3 minutes ago, jaylcfc94 said:

well you think 6.9 is not a 6. the clue is in the numbers...

But this isn't about your stupid money analogy. You're frankly taking the numbers you see and twisting it to fit your point. 

[jaylcfc94]

Just now, UniFox21 said:

 

But this isn't about your stupid money analogy. You're frankly taking the numbers you see and twisting it to fit your point. 

twisting? no i’m saying 6.9 is not 7. it is 6. the clue is in the numbers.