Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, South Shire Fox said:

Could not care less, the amount of times weve been done over with soft penalties given against us. Swings and roundabouts

Only Burnley who never get any have had less penalties by this time last year we had had 10

Posted
5 hours ago, orangecity23 said:

Don't give a toss if Maddison dived - in fact, I'm glad he did. Only last weekend we lost to Villa, and 90% of the reason for that is that their entire team spent the whole game diving to get 28 free kicks, which they used to score against us. Did anyone in the media have a negative word to say about it? No, just praise for sainted Gerrard and the "quality" of their performance. Of course, we had an excellent claim for a penalty turned down for a foul on KDH, despite their being clear contact. Could have had one first half for a foul on Barnes, who stayed on his feet and we had nothing. Did anyone from the pundit world condemn Neal Maupay for his armbar on Vestergard? Some of the most flagrant cheating you'll ever see, nobody bats an eyelid. But Maddison has his cards marked, has always gotten a rough ride from pundits and the press, so he gets put under a microscope as a "cheat", while the rest of the league is filled with players who don't get any criticism for their antics.

 

The game at this level is riddled with diving, if we are going to be the only team that doesn't, then we are naive idiots. Refs are shit, diving is rewarded -so if you don't get to diving yourselves, you'll be left trailing behind the pack as they cheat their way to success.

 

 

100% this. Watching the Napoli players flop about like wet fish the other night showed what cheating really looks like. Maddison was being constantly fouled by the opposition and the penalty was given not because maddison did a lovely aerial manoeuvre but because he was of obviously fouled.

 

Lascelles stuck his leg out. The result was inevitable. The only question is whether Maddison tripped too early or should have let his upper leg smash straight into the Newcastle player so he could spend the rest of the season on the bench with a recurring hip injury, but at least the papers would have been happy. Ridiculous.

  • Like 1
Posted

The Penalty decisions the weekend were a Joke.

We've had so many genuine calls that weren't given that it does make a laugh of Var.

The idea of Var was to improve the game and the integrity of results.

This idea that Var can't overrule the on field ref is just daft. Everyone understands that they won't get every decision right for various reasons like players in the way etc.

When they do get it wrong Var should just step in and at least get him to check the touchline monitor. Then if he doesn't change his mind well and good.

This way you would get most tight decisions right and the right teams gets to benefit, protecting the integrity of the game.

But I guess ''right'' doesn't matter and nothing will change.

Posted
On 12/12/2021 at 22:31, PAPA LAZAROU said:

So you think the likes of Chelsea and Man city owners are free from that sort of thing? especially Man city's owners who are just as guilty of the charges against human rights . And just how do you think Chelsea's owner got his money? a lottery win?

Everything you need to know about human rights in Saudi Arabia 2020 - Amnesty International Amnesty International

 

Really don't think I need to say anymore.

You really can't compare the likes of Abramovich, however horrid and questionable he may be, with a regime such as Saudi Arabia who defacto now own Newcastle. I don't recall him organising the state assassination of a journalist for eg. 

Let's not even get started on Saudi Arabia's treatment of the LGBT community. 

I agree with you on Man City.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Foxaholic ME said:

Only Burnley who never get any have had less penalties by this time last year we had had 10

my gut feeling is that this is due to us very rarely moving the ball quickly in this area or bursting into the box than specific refereeing

 

I could be completely wrong of course.

Posted
7 hours ago, reynard said:

Everything you need to know about human rights in Saudi Arabia 2020 - Amnesty International Amnesty International

 

Really don't think I need to say anymore.

You really can't compare the likes of Abramovich, however horrid and questionable he may be, with a regime such as Saudi Arabia who defacto now own Newcastle. I don't recall him organising the state assassination of a journalist for eg. 

Let's not even get started on Saudi Arabia's treatment of the LGBT community. 

I agree with you on Man City.

Man city it is then.:thumbup:

Posted

Can't believe this is still up on YT but a great video to see things from the away end. 

You get a good look at our defensive line in the first half and also see our atmosphere from looking in.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...