Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will city still be able to sign Abdul Fatawu? 
 Understand because of our transfer embargo & how ****ed we are at the moment the answer right now is NO.

If this doesn’t get sorted out is it worth us getting promoted?

 

Somebody give me something to be positive about regarding our club 🦊🦊

Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Blue Maff said:

Will city still be able to sign Abdul Fatawu? 
 Understand because of our transfer embargo & how ****ed we are at the moment the answer right now is NO.

If this doesn’t get sorted out is it worth us getting promoted?

 

Somebody give me something to be positive about regarding our club 🦊🦊

If we get promoted we won’t be placed under a transfer embargo. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Bert said:

If we get promoted we won’t be placed under a transfer embargo. 

That’s not certain Bert 

some have said that the efl embargo would remain unless they cancel it and would apply in the PL until it got sorted between us the P,L amd EFL 

 

in practice we would probably be allowed to spend within agreed limits to avoid the credibility of the PL being brought into question 

 

In any case, abdul would be allowed to sign due to legal obligations 

Edited by st albans fox
Posted

My interpretation is that we can’t register new players.  But he’s already registered as a player, on loan, with a legal obligation to buy if he plays a certain number of games.  

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Qwerty said:

My interpretation is that we can’t register new players.  But he’s already registered as a player, on loan, with a legal obligation to buy if he plays a certain number of games.  

No agreement in football is legally binding. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

No agreement in football is legally binding. 

I thought it was in the loan deal that we bought him for 10 million if he played x number of games?  Maybe not illegal, but certainly breach of contract if we don’t. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Do we constantly need new threads with shouty titles about topics that have already been covered in other threads? 

Nobody asked u to put ur view across mate. 
 

I didn’t know that it’s already been discussed hence the reason I asked. 
 

That ok with u ? 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Sly said:

We could sign who we want.

 

We just can’t register them.

 

Thats the difference. 


 

 

We all dream of a team of Adrien Silvas:scarf: 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Gamble92 said:

How does that affect players already at the club? Tom Cannon for instance wasn't registered because he's under 21 but next season won't be.

I don't think it would cause a problem with registering Cannon

 

But I think it would just basically stop us from spending big fees on players and giving them high wages and renewing players onto high wages

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...