Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
davieG

Jeremy Monga

By davieG, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, TiffToff88 said:

When Hamza Choudhury was 16 he was linked to Barcelona and Real Madrid too.

Completely forgotten this lol

  • Haha 7
James_lcfc

James_lcfc

Posted
Posted

Yeah not sure you're even allowed an agent at 15 or not.

 

We're all biased of course, but as we're going down he has a genuine chance of playing first-team senior football next year at 16. If he's as good as we think he is he'll play and do well too.

 

Wouldn't be a terrible career move staying with us for now.

  • Like 1
Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

He’s clearly talented and if we stay on the current trajectory we’re on, he won’t ever be playing for us. 
 

UEFA doesn’t permit signing players from other countries under 18, unless the parents are moving for non footballing reasons. 


If we were in the EU, he could have moved at 16. We aren’t in the EU.

 

He could in theory join Arsenal, Manchester City, Manchester City etc when he’s 16, as long as his parents consent and he’s getting adequate education. 
 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted
On 03/02/2025 at 18:50, st albans fox said:

Maybe if we agree for him to go to Madrid when he’s 18 then that’s our best way of keeping him for a couple seasons 

We agree he can go at 24, that would be reasonable.  Two years is nothing, we need to stop being bullied.

justfoxes

justfoxes

Posted
Posted
On 03/02/2025 at 18:16, chris1232 said:

Real Madrid want him

FFS if they want him he must be good come on RVN give him a game or the rest of the season FFFFFS !!

 

Typical Leicester City here’s how to lose an amazing future talent for Peanuts it’s the Leicester City way !!

pleatout

pleatout

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

Its clear he needs to be played, even if we lose him it would at least bump the compensation, the club are so daft.

sigh...

 

Thats why he was on the bench v Man U.  The club really arent that daft.  If he goes it is all evidence for the tribunal to set a fee.

  • Like 1
Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted

There’s no chance he stays, not with the international interest in him. The only way we could keep him beyond this season is if we stayed up, and he was to play. So, the fact we’re going down will just make it easier for him to go.

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

There’s no chance he stays, not with the international interest in him. The only way we could keep him beyond this season is if we stayed up, and he was to play. So, the fact we’re going down will just make it easier for him to go.

Him signing for PSG or Real might suit us as we'd keep him until he's 18.

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ric Flair said:

Him signing for PSG or Real might suit us as we'd keep him until he's 18.

Interesting, I wasn’t aware of that. But would we then play him? 

Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted
On 20/02/2025 at 18:43, st albans fox said:

Bullied?

the kid can do as he wants in the summer 

Even Liverpool fans are admitting the system is broken.  A fan listed to me a dozen or so players they got for peanuts, because the academies are bullied under the existing rules.

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Chrysalis said:

Even Liverpool fans are admitting the system is broken.  A fan listed to me a dozen or so players they got for peanuts, because the academies are bullied under the existing rules.

100% it’s broken

we’re also able to exploit it to take the best players from smaller clubs 

but the very best will get snapped up by the big boys. I’ve already suggested a change - maybe that any kid that has been somewhere for more than four years and leaves before age 18 should have 10% of their subsequent two transfer fees paid to the development club.   There needs to be a system where the first club who take such a player should also pay a fee based on a clearer scale which recognises international appearances etc 

  • Like 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

100% it’s broken

we’re also able to exploit it to take the best players from smaller clubs 

but the very best will get snapped up by the big boys. I’ve already suggested a change - maybe that any kid that has been somewhere for more than four years and leaves before age 18 should have 10% of their subsequent two transfer fees paid to the development club.   There needs to be a system where the first club who take such a player should also pay a fee based on a clearer scale which recognises international appearances etc 

When you consider PSR its a complete disaster.

 

Liverpool get a academy star for lets say 500k.  10 years later, the combined loan fees and sale fee might net them say 20-50 million.

Edited by Chrysalis

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...