Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Top’s Programme Notes vs Arsenal

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

jonny_wright

jonny_wright

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, sishades said:

The vitriol towards Top on this forum is utterly disgusting. Shame on you!

He means well, just isn’t good at leading this club and puts trust in incompetent people 

Raj

Raj

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, sishades said:

The vitriol towards Top on this forum is utterly disgusting. Shame on you!

No ones actually hammered Top but

Bye anyway  👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾

Edited by Raj
Knighton1976

Knighton1976

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Absolute shambles..I stick up for you lot on here as I'd guess you're all well meaning proper passionate City fans.... but you are so wound up in committees, sub committees,.minute taking, association rules and banging a chairman's hammer - 'all those in favour say aye!'

 

one lone punter on here has achieved more in three weeks than you lot have in 20+ years. 

What's he achieved though actually?

Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ginetta opening his gob. Foxes trust being granted a top secret meeting where all they’ve fed back is how Whelan fooled them and these notes. Where was all this when the **** was releasing his end of season bullshit statement. When Rodgers was well passed his sell by date. When the club was offering stupid wages contract after contract. 
 

They’ve caused this protest, each and every one of them. Let’s this be the first of many until they all go. 

Edited by Mickyblueeyes
  • Like 4
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, jonny_wright said:

 

More nonsense, having talks but sworn to secrecy 

There is absolutely no good reason for those talks to be confidential.

 

Foxes "Trust" my arse.

 

Dr The Singh

Dr The Singh

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

I can assure you that the general concerns brought to the table towards the club were pretty much the consistent issues we see across the fanbase. 

It’s up for people to device if it’s better that people know some dialogue is occurring or if it’s better for the Trust not to comment at all. 
 

We will take on board what the wider fanbase want 

 

Transparency is all well ask CosbehFox

Knighton1976

Knighton1976

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Silva Fox said:

KPFC zombie alert!

Or serfs or bodies or any other insult employed on here by the three dozen echo chamberers going round on planet foxestalk.co.uk. I detest the ownership but, honestly, this is even more laughable...

  • Sad 1
hackneyfox

hackneyfox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Silva Fox said:

KPFC zombie alert!

Daft post, bitching at someone who has a different opinion to you is not the way to go. We’ll be back to billing abuse at each other in the ground if we’re not careful.

TrentFox

TrentFox

Posted
Posted

Coming into the Pitchfork Thread without a pitchfork is a risky strategy on my part …… but what else do people really expect him

to say? We all know what we’d like to hear, and what should be said, but what  else did you really think he would say? 🤷

  • Like 1
hackneyfox

hackneyfox

Posted
Posted
Just now, Knighton1976 said:

Or serfs or bodies or any other insult employed on here by the three dozen echo chamberers going round on planet foxestalk.co.uk. I detest the ownership but, honestly, this is even more laughable...

You don’t think detest is too strong a term to use?

Youll just alienate people with ott statements like that. 
I’m not happy about the direction of the club and think that Top needs to step up and clear house but if anyone gets personal about the family that have helped us achieve more than I ever thought possible then I know which side of any divide your force me to take.

  • Like 1
Dr The Singh

Dr The Singh

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TrentFox said:

Coming into the Pitchfork Thread without a pitchfork is a risky strategy on my part …… but what else do people really expect him

to say? We all know what we’d like to hear, and what should be said, but what  else did you really think he would say? 🤷

It was too text book, I would have liked words from his heart, as a fan rather than his comms guy.  Even if it's disagreed with what he says, this is poor.

Viva

Viva

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, dmayne7 said:

What does that actually mean? What is a 'Tete situation'?

Signing a player that Ric was really keen on that turned out to be crap! 

Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
Just now, Viva said:

Signing a player that Ric was really keen on that turned out to be crap! 

I’ve suspected the club have made a conscious decision not to sign players recommended by @Ric Flair recently tbf 

  • Popular Post
Aus Fox

Aus Fox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

What the hell is the point in the FoxesTrust or FAB if this is the response to the meetings? Surely they’re job is to represent and report back to the wider fanbase?

IMG_7715.jpeg

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...