Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Voll Blau said:

You've seen what the electorate are like, right? You've got people who genuinely don't seem to remember *any Prime Minister ever* being worse than Starmer.

 

Unfortunately, you have to think short term these days. People just don't have the attention spans for anything else.

Much of youth and the many conclaves of dimwits that exist purely to get "fame" on FB.

That's all they know, thanks to SM. It's mostly repetitive 7 seconds clips of shite trying to get "likes".

Pathetic and sad that our new generation of kids are being drawn in.

How we, as a world and a society deal with that is almost impossible. Pandora is well and truly out of the box. 

Posted
8 hours ago, st albans fox said:

Is this more scary than climate change ?  Climate change is affecting the planet slowly but surely, year by year. We pretty much know where it’s going and we know what the eventual outcome is likely to be.  Our leaders are burying their heads in the sand and hoping for a reprieve via commercial fusion within 15 years and that the planet will manage to cover the worst of the excesses before then. 
 

AI going rogue could do a lot of damage much faster ?

Standard scientific procedure. If it can be done, let's do it!

 

There's quite a few scientific "achievements" that could do with being put back into Pandora's Box, especially as there's not much hope left in there 

Posted
5 hours ago, leicsmac said:

Mr Lowe so close to getting it.

 

And why exactly are those harvests poor, Mr Lowe? 

FB_IMG_1784735620931.jpg

Surely all that’s needed is the appointment of a minister for drought 

worked a treat in ‘76

  • Haha 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Surely all that’s needed is the appointment of a minister for drought 

worked a treat in ‘76

It worked so well that no one even mentions the drought of 76, ever!

Posted
10 hours ago, LCFCJohn said:

As per Mac above, storage is key. Either way, we are losing a lot of potential energy by the infrastructure not being there. 

 

10 hours ago, leicsmac said:

Which is why better battery storage and fission power should have been implemented as part of the solution decades ago. 

Talking of storage, another promising piece of new tech. 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3dyd4l8250o

 

Posted
9 hours ago, The Bear said:

 

Talking of storage, another promising piece of new tech. 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3dyd4l8250o

 

Splendid. This is what I mean about the tech getting better as it matures. 

 

But there are those who would simply stick to the Paleolithic way of burning things to make our energy, with all the consequences that entails, and not give it a chance to mature at all. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

It worked so well that no one even mentions the drought of 76, ever!

took way too long to announce Howell !

it’s a well known scientific fact that the atmosphere has a very satirical sense of humour 😄

 

and statistically speaking, we have a sample of 1 when it comes to appointing ministers for drought and the immediate ending of said drought. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Really good move that by Burnham 

Increase business rates by 30% alongside other taxes rises.

 

Give them a rebate of 20% and watch the plebs show their gratitude.

 

You are right though. Could have just reversed the rates decision taken by Reeves.

  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, kenny said:

Increase business rates by 30% alongside other taxes rises.

 

Give them a rebate of 20% and watch the plebs show their gratitude.

 

You are right though. Could have just reversed the rates decision taken by Reeves.

Or the middle ground whereby Boris and his cabinet decided give 50% business rate relief to which the government (and in particular local councils) has pretty much reeled from that lack of income since 2019. And we are returning to something more realistic. 

 

Appears to me Burnham is making decent decisions and get people moan for the sake of moaning, 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Or the middle ground whereby Boris and his cabinet decided give 50% business rate relief to which the government (and in particular local councils) has pretty much reeled from that lack of income since 2019. And we are returning to something more realistic. 

 

Appears to me Burnham is making decent decisions and get people moan for the sake of moaning, 

Had Boris not done we would see less venues survive as we are now seeing. As society we need to decide whether social venues are just businesses that need to fail if not viable or an important part of the social fabric.

 

If it's the first, the stuff them they can pay the same as everyone else. If they serve a wider cultural purpose then they will need assistance as they do in other countries.

 

I'm not moaning, I'm pleased he is starting to fix the mess Reeves has created. Long way to go yet.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...