Cobbo Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 This from a manager who likes square pegs in square holes and minimal changes WTF - Unless it's 352 ? That what I was thinking...
Steven Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 That what I was thinking... The OS are saying Paul Henderson continues in goal, with a back four of McAuley, Patrick Kisnorbo, Paddy McCarthy and Maybury playing in front of him from right to left.
SystonFox Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Don't care about the game anymore b*stard bus you having to settle for RL too mate? i feel a 1-1 draw with us scoring 1st. i'll definitely be going down to craven cottage for the replay if we got it.
Foxhateram Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Well looks like dodds will finally get the chance he deserves hope he proves his worth so the we will finally have a guy who can score upfront! but then again i doubt hel score with that midfield suplying the through balls!
Walkers Wonderkid Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 no were gonna win 2-1 i feel it, we will win it with a paddy mac goal in 85 mins!! haha i could hear burch even on the radio (gareth...............(dust ball)) lollol
Walkers Wonderkid Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 and hey louis dodds is on the bench!!!!!
Walkers Wonderkid Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 http://matchlive.safc.premiumtv.co.uk/mlex...lubid=undefined
Finnegan Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 2 - 2 Kisnorbo first scorer. 225 / 1? All things considered that's got to be worth a quid or two.
FrankieWorthoYaggedMyWife Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Looks like 3-5-2 Henderson McAuley McCarthy Kisnorbo Maybury Hughes Williams Tiatto Porter Hume Fryatt
Walkers Wonderkid Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 finnegan am loving your signature keep it up lads excellent just keep passing it around!simple!
davieG Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Looks like 3-5-2Henderson McAuley McCarthy Kisnorbo Maybury Hughes Williams Tiatto Porter Hume Fryatt Is that what you think or they actually playing it like that?
Foxhateram Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Is that what you think or they actually playing it like that? well if we are playing 3-5-2 then those back 3 are gonna be under alot of preassure.
breadandcheese Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 I think McAuley is playing right back in 4-4-2. That to me is a r*tarded thing to do by a manager.
The People's Hero Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 I think McAuley is playing right back in 4-4-2. That to me is a r*tarded thing to do by a manager. Sounds like a manager who wants McAuley and Kisnorbo in on form and wants to include his captain.
Finnegan Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 I have to say, I've just got out the shower so I've not been listening - but purely looking at that side, I have to say it looks like one of the best technical footballing sides we could put out to be fair. Say what you want about the midfield / strikers - they are all capable of getting the ball on the floor and passing it about. Even Tiatto, really.
Simon Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Sounds like a manager who wants McAuley and Kisnorbo in on form and wants to include his captain. Spot on; again its square pegs in round holes
MC Prussian Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Sounds like a bloody good start from our point of view. Who'd have thought that?
TAFKA Castroneves Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Come on City! This is a really good start, let's do something with it!
TAFKA Castroneves Posted 6 January 2007 Posted 6 January 2007 Spot on; again its square pegs in round holes If it gets us the result with our form players being on the pitch then I really don't see what is wrong with it
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.