holly Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 hear hes been banned, well thats just pap bring him bak
OriginalRobboFOX Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 hear hes been banned, well thats just pap bring him bak why?? what for?? was it too much chebbing??
Stevosevic Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 why? who decided if it warrants banning? couldnt of been that bad
Strokes Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 What did he do? I quite like Wils aswell, bring him back.
Milky Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 It's explained here "People are getting banned because the overall quality of posts on FT have been declining lately. To be honest I'd rather not watch it decline and decline until I have no incentive to run the site anymore " You'll have to slap on some bend gay and try and twist admins arm.
Strokes Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 Perhaps the Mods/Admin should practice what they preech and set a good example, i've read pretty irrelavent and random posts by most of them. Davie G excluded.
holly Posted 28 February 2007 Author Posted 28 February 2007 dont really get it, if u dont like something surely just dont read it!!
Milky Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 dont really get it, if u dont like something surely just dont read it!! From what i gather it seems to be more about preserving the reputation of Foxestalk. Quite a few of the long time members have expressed how the site has gone downhill in quality.
OriginalRobboFOX Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 that maybe so, therefore ban people like ??????? who keep posting things that rhyme with wills.....
Manwell Pablo Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 dont really get it, if u dont like something surely just dont read it!! Thats a bit of a contradiction in terms really isn't it Hol, seeing as you don't know that you don't like something until you've read it, by which time its a bit to late. Mills.
Alexikokopops Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 Blimey, we'll be next Alex.... we got busted.
filbertway Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 Thats a bit of a contradiction in terms really isn't it Hol, seeing as you don't know that you don't like something until you've read it, by which time its a bit to late. Mills. Good point, I took it as, if you don't like what a person generally says, then don't read what they post, block them or whatever it is you can, if you will.
lcfc_jme Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 Wils is a genius. I wouldn't mind seeing him return to the forum with immediate effect. Fact of the matter is, if people got banned every time they posted shit on a consistent basis, this forum would not exist. That much is true. And this goes for the younger members of the forum right through to the older ones. New posters and veterans. Regulars and Mods. I would just like to clarify whether or not Wils (and the others who have been banned) are scapegoats and are being made an example of so the rest of the forum books its ideas up?
lcfc_jme Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 I would just like to clarify whether or not Wils (and the others who have been banned) are scapegoats and are being made an example of so the rest of the forum books its ideas up? This not going to be confirmed or rejected either way then..?
davieG Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 This not going to be confirmed or rejected either way then..? I would suggest that it's a silly and insulting question, but if it was in jest FO.
Manwell Pablo Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 No smoke without fire. Not techincally true, the exhaust fumes of a car are proof of this.
lcfc_jme Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 I would suggest that it's a silly and insulting question, but if it was in jest FO. Silly and insulting?? I think I can manage the silly part fairly comfortably! Not sure insulting is a word which can be used to describe me though.. Still no answer then?!
Webbo Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 can we have an example of what constitutes crap, so i know what not to do.
holly Posted 28 February 2007 Author Posted 28 February 2007 yeh, but it wasnt meant to be obviously!!! just didnt really come out right
stez Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 Not techincally true, the exhaust fumes of a car are proof of this. the exhaust fumes of a car a caused by an explosion and flame in the cylinder can we have an example of what constitutes crap, so i know what not to do.
Brainy Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 can we have an example of what constitutes crap, so i know what not to do. That Ban him, Stezzeh
Nationwider Posted 28 February 2007 Posted 28 February 2007 I set my "crap bar" very low when moderating. Crap is ok, as long as its good crap. One or two little monkeys have been sneaking below the "crap bar" though. Pissy MSN chat in the LCFC forum is a no-no. Here's a plan... 1 - The Banned come back in a day or so. 2 - We get promoted next season. 3 - Everyone gets along again.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.