Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Sods

Leicestershire County Cricket Club

By Sods, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

Harpenden Fox

Harpenden Fox

Posted
Posted

So after those early weeks of optimism, our playing record is:

P 9. W1. D4. L4  (points 7)

We're going down with the Leicester.

Apologies. Supporting Leicester teams is not great at the moment (I'm not a rugby fan)

MaidstoneFox

MaidstoneFox

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Sunbury Fox said:

Truly bad performance. Got to change things up. Something like:

 

Budinger

Welch 

Patel

Ackers

Mulder

Hill

Ahmed

Scriven

Parky

Naveen

Finan

Usually takes 5 games to find the right team, then we win a few and just miss out

MaidstoneFox

MaidstoneFox

Posted
Posted

Hopefully we don't renew Lilley's contract. Not sure why we give Sam Evans another year as he doesn't look like he's going to play at all in any format. That money could have been spent on a white ball batter, or anyone in fact who would be more useful than those two.

 

We also need to extend Rishi's contract as I believe it expires this season - top run scorer in div 2 at the moment, above Pujara and Labuschagne.

  • Like 2
CrawlingFox

CrawlingFox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Second XI today looks like:

 

Hill, Budinger, Ahmed, Kimber, Malik, Evans, Scriven, Barnes, Hull, Salisbury, Finan.

 

I'd suggest Hill and Kimber would be  realistic options to add to our first XI batting and any of the bowlers could put their hand up to replace Davis based on his form so far.

 

Edit: Hill with 39 off 28 and Kimber 14 off 10 in the first game. Budinger with 6 off 7.

Edited by CrawlingFox
CrawlingFox

CrawlingFox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Some unreal knocks already this year:

 

Abbott for Hants - 110 off 41

Clark for Durham - 102 off 49

Cooke for Glam - 113 off 41

 

Lilley next to rack up a rapid ton tomorrow?

 

Edit: Struck me after I posted that if anyone fancies a ton tomorrow then worryingly Wayne Madsen is in good form so far this year...

Edited by CrawlingFox
  • Haha 1
Walshy5

Walshy5

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CrawlingFox said:

Some unreal knocks already this year:

 

Abbott for Hants - 110 off 41

Clark for Durham - 102 off 49

Cooke for Glam - 113 off 41

 

Lilley next to rack up a rapid ton tomorrow?

 

Edit: Struck me after I posted that if anyone fancies a ton tomorrow then worryingly Wayne Madsen is in good form so far this year...

Worst part about it is I can't see that any of our batsmen are capable of getting a ton at this format. We're missing an Inglis or Ronchi type player.

Sunbury Fox

Sunbury Fox

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

Hill, Scriven, Hull and Finan all in the twos today 

So (bar the return of Naveen) we can expect an unchanged team again tonight following our excellent form so far!lol

  • Haha 3
CrawlingFox

CrawlingFox

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sunbury Fox said:

So (bar the return of Naveen) we can expect an unchanged team again tonight following our excellent form so far!lol

If it ain't broke then don't fix it.

Tommy Fresh

Tommy Fresh

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, CrawlingFox said:

Some unreal knocks already this year:

 

Abbott for Hants - 110 off 41

Clark for Durham - 102 off 49

Cooke for Glam - 113 off 41

 

Lilley next to rack up a rapid ton tomorrow?

 

Edit: Struck me after I posted that if anyone fancies a ton tomorrow then worryingly Wayne Madsen is in good form so far this year...

Sean Abbott for Surrey wasn't it?

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...