Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Lets Be having You

QPR Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Posted
I would have never players 3.5 defenders across midfield in the first place as I said before the kick-off. But I wouldn't hesitate to put the matter right. What early use is Chambers going to be at left-back?

CHambers is a better player than Mattock and Sheehan at this moment in time anyway.

Holloway wants to put things right by playing wingers and midfielders in the midfield, but can't sign everyone he wants to do this on 1st January!

Posted
We need to sort this out. It says something when we've actually started playing N'Gotty in Midfield.

Is Clemance actually playing?

Is anyone playing would be my question!

Posted

Doesn't really sound as though we're actually playing as bad as the scoreline may suggest.

Still no excuses and it's not good enough.

Posted
2-0 :(

What's Going On?!?!

It's Stearman he's useless :whistle:

Posted

0,,~3160192,00.gif19Norwich City26-930

0,,~3160190,00.gif20Leicester City26-227

0,,~3160192,00.gif21Preston26-627

0,,~3160190,00.gif22S****horpe26-1227

0,,~3160192,00.gif23Colchester26-625

0,,~3160190,00.gif24Sheffield Wed25-725

Goal difference keeps us out of the bottom 3

Posted
HT

2-0 QPR

Shit game, shit team, shit effort. Shit.

Empty your guilty conscience on the toilet, gentlemen...

I'm annoyed.

In all honesty that sums it up really.

Posted
Things can only get better in the 2nd half.....cant they?

could be 5-0 and two or three red cards!! ....so i guess we should be grateful

Posted
0,,~3160192,00.gif19Norwich City26-930

0,,~3160190,00.gif20Leicester City26-227

0,,~3160192,00.gif21Preston26-627

0,,~3160190,00.gif22S****horpe26-1227

0,,~3160192,00.gif23Colchester26-625

0,,~3160190,00.gif24Sheffield Wed25-725

Goal difference keeps us out of the bottom 3

And that's only because of Fulop, and now he's gone. :frusty:

Posted
CHambers is a better player than Mattock and Sheehan at this moment in time anyway.

Holloway wants to put things right by playing wingers and midfielders in the midfield, but can't sign everyone he wants to do this on 1st January!

It is not a matter of who's the better player, it is a matter of balancing what different players bring to the team. James Chambers hasn't scored or made one single goal since he's been here.

I am sick of hearing what we're going to do tomorrow. We sent our best winger to Bournemouth in August!

We leave our most creative midfielder, Andy King, out in the cold and instead we play two essentially defensive players.

It's not as we haven't done that in the past and paid the penalty.

You cannot start with two potential attackers plus two halves and expect to win a Championship football match other than by a fortunate smash and grab.

Such tactics only mean the opposition can commit more players to attack. As we might have already gathered from the visit to Burnley.

Posted
Things can only get better in the 2nd half.....cant they?

Of course they can but we need to take off 3.5 defenders and replace them with 2 attacking midfielders and 1.5 strikers. Then by reshuffling the pack we should adopt a formation of 3.75 - 4.10 - 2.15.

I really can't understand why we are not utilising the talents of Sheehan and making the most of his average of 0.6 assists and 0.83 completed passes every 152 seconds.

It's like listening to a Rob Kelly team in action at Burnley.

Pah.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...