Guest Posted 28 April 2008 Posted 28 April 2008 Henderson Stearman--- McAuley --- WorleyChambers ------------------------------------ MattockWeso-------- OakleyHendrieHume ------ Howard Subs: Fryatt, Campbell, Beswick, N'Gotty, Alnwick That don't look bad actually. I'd probably have Hayles and King on the bench in place of Fryatt and Beswick though
clazkel Posted 28 April 2008 Posted 28 April 2008 Henderson Stearman--- McAuley --- WorleyChambers ------------------------------------ MattockWeso-------- OakleyHendrieHume ------ Howard Subs: Fryatt, Campbell, Beswick, N'Gotty, Alnwick That looks good to me, apart from I wouldn't play Howard i would play Fryatt or Hayles upfront with Hume and If Hayles doesn't play then he would be on the bench
Master Fox Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 N'gotty was the main reason we lost on Saturday, Kisnorbo is sh*t, but not anywhere near as sh*t as N'gotty.
GLC Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 henderson mattock mcauley bruno stearman(hes shit tho) bell oakley jimbo laczko fryatt hume subs campbell clapham hayles worley bori get rid of steven s**t howard he couldnt score in a brothel
lavrentis Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Henderson Stearman--- McAuley --- WorleyChambers ------------------------------------ MattockWeso-------- OakleyHendrieHume ------ Howard Subs: Fryatt, Campbell, Beswick, N'Gotty, Alnwick That's interesting, I probably would go for that
Thracian Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 hendersonmattock mcauley bruno stearman(hes shit tho) bell oakley jimbo laczko fryatt hume subs campbell clapham hayles worley bori get rid of steven s**t howard he couldnt score in a brothel One thing is for sure. If we need to score goals and you prefer Bori to Ryan Beswick then he kid might as well get himself up to Leeds with Shush! just as quick as he can.
Samilktray Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 -------------------------------------henderson---------------------------------stearman-------------------ngotty------------macauley---------------mattock --------------bell--------------------oakley-----------------hendrie----------- ----------------fryatt----------------howard-----------------hume------------- although we all know that hayles is going to start and so is clapham. if things are not going right at half time id bring dj on We need to score goals to win believe it or not. fook off Fryatt.
Mr Happy Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 I'd pick.... hell it doesn't actually matter what I'd pick as its never going to happen is it? Ollie will still pick the likes of Howard, DJ, Clapham, etc Incidently though my team would be; Henderson/Alnwick Stearman N'Gotty (don't know why people are slating the guy, I thought he played better thsn McAuley against weds) McAuley Mattock Bell Weso Oakley Hendrie (if hes fit) Hume DJ/Fryatt Subs: Sappleton, A.Chambers, King, J.Chambers, Laczko
Father Ted Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Henderson N'gotty Stearman Mcauley Mattock Bell Wesolowski Oakley Hendrie/HaylesHume Campbell Subs: Alnwick, Clapham, Laczko, Hayles, Howard Right then... I've gone with Stearman and Mcauley to deal with the physicality and pace of the strikers at centre-back as oppose to Bruno and Mcauley, because if Bruno was to play we would sit deeper which we won't want with players like Lawrence lurking at the edge of the box. I was a bit stuck on whether to go for the experience of Clapham to deal with Lawrence or the pace and passion of Mattock. I chose Mattock for his distribution and mainly for the fact he could easily keep up with Lawrence. I have also gone with two small nippy strikers up front, without Kisnorbo and Clapham we would very much wipe out the long-ball so no need for the donkey Howard, instead play it into feet around Leon Cort - we will win many more free-kicks and Howard would only lose the physical battle. Our aim with this team is to run them ragged, play the ball on the floor, into feet and play at a very high tempo. But if we play this team, which could be likely all I can see is DEFEAT and RELEGATION and OLLIE OUT!: Henderson Stearman Bruno Mcauley ClaphamBell Weso Oakley Hendrie/HaylesHume Howard = BORING TEAM!
Tommeh Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 --------------------Henderson-------------- ---Chambers--N'Gotty--McAuley--Mattock--- --Bell-----Oakley-----Wesolowski---Hendrie-- ----------------DJ---Hume---------------
Tevez Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 --------------------Henderson-----------------Chambers--N'Gotty--McAuley--Mattock--- --Bell-----Oakley-----Wesolowski---Hendrie-- ----------------DJ---Hume--------------- Why Chambers Tom?
MikeyT Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 --------------------Henderson-----------------Chambers--N'Gotty--McAuley--Mattock--- --Bell-----Oakley-----Wesolowski---Hendrie-- ----------------DJ---Hume--------------- Id go with that as well! Hopefully Hendrie will be available after injury! *crosses fingers* And yes to Chambers being in the starting line up over Stearman.
Tommeh Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Why Chambers Tom? Just think he's a better player end of. Steamran has made an improvement, yes but how chambers has been ignored by ollie prety much since he arrived is one of the only things thats really annoyed me about his selection.
Tevez Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Just think he's a better player end of. Steamran has made an improvement, yes but how chambers has been ignored by ollie prety much since he arrived is one of the only things thats really annoyed me about his selection. Ahhh right, nice to see DJ in there aswell mate.. Hope he can pull out a decent performance we've longed for this season.
Flynny Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Henderson Chambers - Stearman - McAuley - MattockBell - Hendrie - Wesolowski - HaylesFryatt - Hume Thats as positive as is vaguely realistic and should put up a good fight actually.
Tevez Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Hendo Stearman McAuley N Gotty Clapham Bell Oakley Weso Hayles Hume Howard
Fox You Forest Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Henderson Chambers . Stearman . Mcauley . Mattock Bell . Wesolowski . Hendrie Hume . Fryatt Howard The old upside down chritmas tree.
clazkel Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 Henderson Chambers - Stearman - McAuley - MattockBell - Hendrie - Wesolowski - HaylesFryatt - Hume Thats as positive as is vaguely realistic and should put up a good fight actually. Looks a positive well balanced team, with Kisnorbo out Stearman is probably the most suited player to play centre back as Worley hasn't played enough for us and N'Gotty will be to slow to deal with there strikers, but i like Stearman as right back as he gets forward alot and looks useful so not sure whats best I defo wouldn't play Howard as it encourages us to knock long balls and if we want to compete with Stoke we need to play the ball on the floor and go for it, it hasn't really worked with Howard up front so Ollie shouldn't start with him. He's good to have as a sub if we are chasing the game but he shouldn't start, but i bet he does
melrose Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 HendoStearman McAuley N Gotty Clapham Bell Oakley Weso Hayles Hume Howard Sub T James
Bryn Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 I think I'd be inclined to go 5-3-2 as well. I wouldn't put Worley anywhere near the starting line up though. Henderson McAuley Stearman N'GottyChambers--------------------------------MattockOakley WesolowskiHendrieHume Fryatt
clazkel Posted 29 April 2008 Posted 29 April 2008 I think I'd be inclined to go 5-3-2 as well. I wouldn't put Worley anywhere near the starting line up though. Henderson McAuley Stearman N'GottyChambers--------------------------------MattockOakley WesolowskiHendrieHume Fryatt That looks well balanced aswell, how about playing Hayles instead of Chambers as he's proved over the past few games that he's good at defending and looks good coming forward. Chambers is worthy of a place though but he hasn't played too much lately and Stoke is such a big game
BigGibbo Posted 30 April 2008 Posted 30 April 2008 Couldn't agree more. Just one more "dropping" required......Howard. But if we actually play wingers on either side & get balls into the box from the bi-line as oppose to the half way line then Howard will be an asset.
RowlattsFox Posted 30 April 2008 Posted 30 April 2008 ..................Henderson..................... Stearman...N'Gotty...McAuley..Clapham Bell...Wesolowski...Hendrie.....Mattock ..............Howard.....Hume............. Subs: Alnwick, Worley, Oakley, Hayles, Campbell
CupidStunt Posted 30 April 2008 Posted 30 April 2008 Ollie will play pretty much the same side he put out against weds,be sure of that albiet,N'gotty in for kisnorbo,and hendrie taking the place of hayles if fit. Henderson Stearman Gotty Mcauley Crapman Bell Wes Oakley Hendrie Howard Hume
Bert Posted 30 April 2008 Posted 30 April 2008 One thing is for sure. If we need to score goals and you prefer Bori to Ryan Beswick then he kid might as well get himself up to Leeds with Shush! just as quick as he can. Reserve team football is totally different to First team football. Answer this - If Beswick was so good, how come he has never been in the first team travelling squad?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.