Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Daggers

Absolute *** of our time Pt.MXXVI

By Daggers, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Rincewind

Rincewind

Posted
Posted

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-26850024

Another good honest hand out recipient

Would you agree this woman is equally as guilty of fraud and should be treated the same?

 

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/maria-miller-to-face-criminal-proceedings?bucket&source=facebook-share-button&time=1396698534

 

yo cannot have one rule for one and another for someone else. The amount does not matter either. The action does.

Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted

Would you agree this woman is equally as guilty of fraud and should be treated the same?

 

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/maria-miller-to-face-criminal-proceedings?bucket&source=facebook-share-button&time=1396698534

 

yo cannot have one rule for one and another for someone else. The amount does not matter either. The action does.

If she's done wrong and it can be proved in court then of course she should get done.

Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted

She has and it has. her punishment was to pay part of it back and make a 30 second apology.

That's a tribunal not a court. If she's successfully prosecuted then she deserves everything coming to her.

MikeyT

MikeyT

Posted
Posted

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/10762531/Women-who-have-sex-before-marriage-should-be-hanged-says-senior-politician-in-Indias-Socialist-Party.html

 

Women who have sex before marriage should be hanged, says senior politician in India's Socialist Party Abu Azmi, the Socialist Party’s Maharashtra unit chief, says that women who have sex before marriage should be hanged, while the Party's leader says he will scrap a law giving the death penalty to rapists if he’s elected prime minister

Mulayam Singh Yadav, the head of India’s Socialist (Samajwadi) Party, said he would get rid of a recently introduced law that handed death sentences to repeat rape offenders, because it was not uncommon “for boys to make mistakesâ€.

Referring to a recent case from Mumbai in which three men were sentenced to death for carrying out two gang rapes, Mr Yadav told an election rally that rape happens because women lead men on.

"Boys will be boys. Following a girl-boy fight, the girl complains she was raped," he said.

On Friday, Mr Yadav, whose son is the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, appeared to row back on his comments.

"Many people said that my comments were right. I am against rape. Rapists should be given the most severe punishment," he said at another rally.

"Innocent people should not be hanged. Rape is being debated in half the world. If I said this, it was wrong."

His original comments were echoed by the Socialist Party’s Maharashtra unit chief, Abu Azmi, who said that women who have sex outside marriage should be punished by death, even if they are raped.

“If rape happens with or without consent, it should be punished as prescribed in Islamâ€, Mr Azmi told the Mid-Day website.

“The solution is this: any woman, whether married or unmarried, who goes along with a man, with or without her consent, should be hanged. Both should be hanged. It shouldn’t be allowed even if a woman goes by consent.â€

Mr Azmi’s son Farhan, who is standing as a Socialist candidate in Mumbai, apologised for his father’s comments, according to The Independent.

"I believe a rapist should be hanged a hundred times," he said. "I have five sisters and everyone in my family believes the same."

The comments also drew condemnation from several other politicians.

Shobha Oza, a spokesman for the ruling Congress Party, said, "It is unfortunate that any leader makes such a statement regarding a crime like rape. Such statements encourage persons involved in such crimes."

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is expected to win India’s ongoing elections, called Mr Yadav’s statement “insensitive and shamefulâ€.

Susieben Shah, chairperson of the Maharashtra Commission for Women, told the Indian Express that she had issued a notice for Mr Azmi to appear in person to explain his statement.

“His statement is deplorable, irresponsible and condemnable … When you are in a position of power, you are duty-bound to protect women?†she said. “I call upon all women to come out in large numbers like they did in Bastar, Vidarbha and Delhi to vote for a leader who protects women’s dignity.â€

Finnaldo

Finnaldo

Posted
Posted

lol Surely they're the furthest thing from absolute *****?!

He means that it is literary a (artificial) cvnt ;)

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted

Hope that cnut finally gets his deserves.

Takes some man to order a woman to be dragged away from her screaming kids and executed.

leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hope that cnut finally gets his deserves.

Takes some man to order a woman to be dragged away from her screaming kids and executed.

 

Him and that appalling excuse for a man of the cloth Paisley should be locked in a room together with one baseball bat, and told to sort it out once and for all.

 

So many people killed, for the sake of sheer pointless stupidity. Thank goodness it's calmed down at least a few notches in recent times.

Edited by leicsmac
Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted

Him and that appalling excuse for a man of the cloth Paisley should be locked in a room together with one baseball bat, and told to sort it out once and for all.

 

So many people killed, for the sake of sheer pointless stupidity. Thank goodness it's calmed down at least a few notches in recent times.

 

Paisley might be a cnut but dont even put him in the same ball park as Adams.

 

It's not the same league, in fact its not even the same sport.

leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted

Paisley might be a cnut but dont even put him in the same ball park as Adams.

 

It's not the same league, in fact its not even the same sport.

 

I think both of them are plenty filthy, Paisley just had the nudge-nudge wink-wink approach to his paramilitaries carrying out the filth rather than Adams having a hand in doing it himself. I can see you think differently, however.

 

As I've said on here before, I think the whole thing stinks from start to finish and neither side can claim to be righteous.

Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think both of them are plenty filthy, Paisley just had the nudge-nudge wink-wink approach to his paramilitaries carrying out the filth rather than Adams having a hand in doing it himself. I can see you think differently, however.

 

As I've said on here before, I think the whole thing stinks from start to finish and neither side can claim to be righteous.

 

That's quite an allegation Mac if you have no evidence to back it up.

Edited by MattP

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...