SirBlueFoxington Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Hobbs was bollocks, Neilsen was worse.Wellens continues to send blood into my pre-match flaccid member. Neilsen was quality today. Didn't put a foot wrong.
Daggers Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Neilsen was quality today. Didn't put a foot wrong. Well, that's where we differ. And that is why I can no longer go on with this sham of a marriage.
Ultra Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Weale - 7 Neilson - 7 Hobbs - 7 Brown - 6 Berner - 7 N'Guessan - 6 Wellens - 7 Oakley - 6 Dyer - 5 Howard - 6 Fryatt - 8* King - 6 Waghorn - 6 Gallagher N/A
TrickyTrev Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Weale - 7 Neilson - 6 Hobbs - 6 Brown - 6 Berner - 7 N'Guessan - 7 Wellens - 7 Oakley - 7 Dyer - 5 Howard - 6 Fryatt - 8 King - 6 Waghorn - 6 Gallagher N/A
Jimmy Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 Neilson 6 Hobbs 5 Brown 8 Berner 7 N'Guessan 6 Wellens 7 Oakley 6 Dyer 6 - improvement in his effort, passing was poor Fryatt 6 - despite the goals he was generally poor, numerous misplaced passes and didn't pass when he should of done, he won't get that much time & space most weeks so its probably only a matter of time before the goals stop and he's replaced in the team, however he took the goals well Howard 6 - Won all his headers but some of his all round play was poor
bigneville Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 A huge point there Webbo!.Why do we get people on loan, i.e pay their wages or at least part of and leave them bench warming? Pearson has some impressive attributes but he also makes some appaling footballing decisions! Some people are never happy. NP is a legend. 6th in the Championship on our return, I think he's making all the right footballing decisions to be honest.
Fox92 Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale - 7 Neilson - 7 Hobbs - 7 Brown - 7 Berner - 7 N'Guessan - 6 Wellens - 7 Oakley - 7 Dyer - 6 Howard - 7 Fryatt - 8 Man of the Match ____ Weale never put a foot wrong as well as the defence although Burgess was alot to deal with, he held the ball up superbly. N'Guessan again faded after about 20minutes with the odd thing, Wellens and Oakley didn't shine but when it was needed played well. Howard was good, had a few chances himself but Matty Fryatt showed why he is the best finisher at the club, with two great goals. King - 6 Waghorn - 6 Gallagher N/A
ThorpeAstleyFox Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 Nielson 6.5 Hobbs 5.5 Brown 7.5 Berner 6.5 N'Guessan 7.5 Oakly 7.5 Wellens 6.5 Dyer 6.5 Fryatt 8 Howard 7.5 Subs: King 5.5 Waghaorn 6.5 Gallagher N/A
Fez of Mahrez Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 Neilson 6 Hobbs 6 Brown 6 Berner 7 N'Guessan 7 Oakley 8 Wellens 7 Dyer 6 Howard 7 Fryatt 8 King 6 Waghorn 6
dogadug Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Some people are never happy.NP is a legend. 6th in the Championship on our return, I think he's making all the right footballing decisions to be honest. Same here, I never expected we'd get off to such a good start, and as every week goes past, we're beginning to look more and more like play-off contenders, although not automatic contenders like the knob Stringer was saying on Radio Leicester.
Pete_foxes Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 why do some of you continue to slate Fryatt, I cant understand it!
djedmundo Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale - 7 Neilson - 6 Hobbs - 6 Brown - 6 Berner - 8 (made some really good runs) N'Guessan - 7 Oakley - 7 Wellens - 8 (First time ive got to see him the guy is quality!!) Dyer - 6 (did well to win a few balls but seemed to disappear during the game) Howard 6.5 (bit slow in the 1st half bit of an improvement in the second...shud have taken the shot instead of passing to fryatt on the dodgey offside occasion) Fryatt - 8 (Great finishing, could of had loads unfortunate not to get hat-trick )
foxaholic Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 I must have missed a trick with Howard today or something. hear hear he was our worst player
Guest Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 Neilson 6 Hobbs 6 Brown 6 Berner 7 N'Guessan 7 Oakley 7 Wellens 8 Dyer 6 Howard 7 Fryatt 8.5 King 6 Waghorn 6
Corky Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale- 7 Neilson- 6.5 Hobbs- 6 Brown- 7 Berner- 7.5 N'Guessan- 6.5 Oakley- 8 Wellens- 7.5 Dyer- 7 Fryatt- 8 Howard- 6.5
dogadug Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 why do some of you continue to slate Fryatt, I cant understand it! Nor do I, he scored twice yesterday, looked really sharp, made some excellent runs, and although he was caught offside a number of times, most of them were not offside, they were mistakes by the linesman.
Thracian Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 why do some of you continue to slate Fryatt, I cant understand it! Yesterday's performance was about as good as he's given for City. He was sharp, keen and made two easily missable chances look ridiculously simple. Not only that but it was his alertness that enabled him to find the chances he took and his ability to run the ball into dangerous places showed at other times too. Criticism of him does not necessarily equate to a slating in any case. For myself I couldn't be more pleased to see Fryatt performing at his best. But that still doesn't stop some of us being concerned about his perceived limitations against good defenders. I'd like to see him leap better. I'd like to see him attack the near post on occasions and to score a wider range of goals. There are other things like his pace and strength which I've questioned too although those shortcomings didn't show-up against Blackpool so they might be areas he's worked on and I'd be pleased about that. I've questioned whether we need greater pace than Howard/Fryatt offer to open up the better defences we're going to face this year but it's one thing to make such a point and quite another to offer alternatives to either one of them even as a game progresses. DJ doesn't seem to count, Gallagher hasn't shown himself to be quick and it would be hard to make a case for Waghorn as a alternative strike option on any grounds. And all that makes me distinctly nervous about our options should Fryatt or Howard get injured. Because, as it stands they are by far the most dangerous strikers we have. Whether that's a good thing for our team or not time will tell. As it will concerning othr departments.
dogadug Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Yesterday's performance was about as good as he's given for City.He was sharp, keen and made two easily missable chances look ridiculously simple. Not only that but it was his alertness that enabled him to find the chances he took and his ability to run the ball into dangerous places showed at other times too. Criticism of him does not necessarily equate to a slating in any case. For myself I couldn't be more pleased to see Fryatt performing at his best. But that still doesn't stop some of us being concerned about his perceied limitations against good defenders. I'd like to see him leap better. I'd like to see him attack the near post on occasions and to score a wider range of goals. There are other things like his pace and strength which I've questioned too although those shortcomings didn't show-up against Blackpool so they might be areas he's worked on and I'd be pleased about that. I've questioned whether we need greater pace than Howard/Fryatt offer to open up the better defences we're going to face this year but it's one thing to make such a point and quite another to offer alternatives to either one of them even as a game progresses. DJ doesn't seem to count, Gallagher hasn't shown himself to be quick and it would be hard to make a case for Waghorn as a alternative strike option on any grounds. And all that makes me distinctly nervous about our options should Fryatt or Howard get injured. Because, as it stands they are by far the most dangerous strikers we have. Whether that's a good thing for our team or not time will tell. As it will concerning othr departments. You forgot about Big Yann
James. Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 - thought his distribution was good. Neilson 6 - solid(ish) and at times willing to go forward. Hobbs 6 - ok. Brown 7 - didn't actually see the mistake but surprised people are marking him down, I thought he was great. Berner 7 - seemed to get better and better as the game went along. N'Guessan 6 - in and out of the game but a dangerous player nevertheless. Oakley 7 - proper central midfielder. Wellens 7 - proper central midfielder. Dyer 6 - same as N'Guessan. Time for a break I think. Fryatt 8 - absolutely quality (not just for the goals). Howard 7 - same old from Steve. Criticisms: 1. We seemed to lack a bit of urgency in the first half, just seemed a bit lazy, not chasing balls down. Much better second half. 2. Thought King for Dyer was an odd substitution particularly as it left Wellens on the left of midfield. Can understand why he did it but thought Adams would probably have been a better choice to bring on. First game of the season. Was sitting on the edge of J and K and really enjoyed the atmosphere. Maybe it's because I don't go that often but the criticisms of the Walkers seem a bit OTT to be honest. Yeah it's not amazing but it's certainly not as bad as people make out.
Corky Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 why do some of you continue to slate Fryatt, I cant understand it! He does tend to hold on to the ball too long at times.
Durnerz Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 First game back for a long time, impressed with our lads this season and saturday was no exception..... Weale 6 - Steady keeper, looks to use a variety of distribution and good decision making around the box regarding punching and catching. Neilson 7 - Steady down the right looks better now he's had a few games with us, lovely diagonals for N'guessen. Hobbs 8 - The skys the limit for this lad, composed, classy with all the attributes of a top centre-half. Brown 7 - Bad mistake for the goal but excelled around that, a lot of character. Berner 7 - Very good performance, superb tackler and useful going forward. N'Guessen 7 - Looked good all match down the flank, quick, skillful good touch. Oakley 6 - decent performance, kept the midfield ticking. Wellens 6 - Was expecting a lot more from this guy, signs of a talented player but had his work cut out with Blackpools midfield. Dyer 5 - Looks out of his depth, poor decisions and comes inside far too much ,reminds me of Danny Tiatto without the tenacity, does he even want it any more? Howard 6 - Frustrating afternoon for the big man, some lovely hold up play and had some chances to bag but didnt take advantage, still a pivotal figure in the side as shown when he went off. Fryatt 7 - The goals aside he didnt do a great deal but then again thats a strikers job, no?
bluebeau Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 7 - Very good game did everything asked of him, so actually scored 10/10 if that makes sense? Berner 7 - Classy player, never seems to get flustered, very popular with the fans. Hobbs 6.5 - I thought he was affected by Browns below par performance. Brown 6 - Not his usual commanding performance & was to blame for their goal. Neilsen 7 - His best game so far, improving in the English game. Dyer 7 - Caused 'pool problems but needs to be more consistent. Oakley 8 - Probably one of the best midfielders in this league, & a good skipper, leads by example. Wellens 8 - Living up to his reputation & easy to see why he was so popular at Doncaster. Ngessan 6.5 In & out of the game, still adjusting to the change in league after Lincoln. Howard 6 - His poorest game for a long time, had to be taken off. Standing ovation deserved 'cos he puts in 100% & well liked by the fans. Fryatt 8.5 His best game this season, not only for his 2 goals, but because of his work rate, really involved in the game, MOM. Subs, King 6 Waghorn 6 Gallagher n/a Ref - Didn't have a bad game but was let down by his linesmen who were pathetic. Maybe NP should rest Howard against Posh & play Kermit up front with Fryatt?
Guest Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 DJ doesn't seem to count, Gallagher hasn't shown himself to be quick and it would be hard to make a case for Waghorn as a alternative strike option on any grounds. Have you seen him play up front for any prolonged period? I haven't and I'm just curious as to how you know this
AjcW Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 Weale 8: In the second half from the family stand end, caught every single corner, made a save in the first half also, I think he is underrated by many. Neilson 7: Settling in nicely. Hobbs 7: Went through the game without me noticing him *which usually means he's having a stormer* Brown 7: Dont see what everyones problem is, one mistake which didnt cost us the game.. Fantastic triple stop in the last minutes of the game also. Berner 8: I Love this man, Joe Who... Another superb performance, made up for Dyers poor game by providing a few crosses himself. N'Guessan 7: Pacey and caused their left back hell in the first half, quiet in the second. Oakley 7: Didnt put a foot wrong but didnt do anything spectactular either so a solid 7. Wellens 7: This man can certainly pick out a pass!! Great buy looks like he has played for us for years. Dyer 5: Sorry, not at the races today, runs and runs and then.... stops.... and then.... loses the ball. Howard 6: Won all his headers as always, even a few free kicks, but not quite on top form, maybe a rest required. Fryatt 9: Two clear chances, two clear goals, a "Finisher" in all ways
shlyser Posted 13 September 2009 Posted 13 September 2009 i am french sometimes i look your team because i like it and i hope leicester come in first league next year but why maxi gradel is out of team? the coach dont trust what happen?? for him have you got ideas??
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.