Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Edwards-lcfcfan

Weale to Hammers

Recommended Posts

Posted

Edit: Saw Timh10101 post about Rais M'Bolhi from Algeria is in the Hammers sight as well too late...

Posted

Plese don't let this be true, Weale's a fantastic keeper and kept us in countless games last year. He made one big mistake throughout the whole of the season.

Posted

IMHO (and my friends and family who follow Leicester too) we are all big fans of Chris, but Walker, despite him acting like a woman with his hair in the 18 yard box, was better...

What's your point there??? We sign Ian Walker back?

Posted

IMHO (and my friends and family who follow Leicester too) we are all big fans of Chris, but Walker, despite him acting like a woman with his hair in the 18 yard box, was better...

Who is comparing the two? :unsure:

Posted

No i'm not saying we sign him back (god no), i'm just making the point to people who say he's been our best keeper for ages...we said that about Fulop didn't we. I'm just trying to point out that if we were to lose him and got money for him, maybe it would enable us to go out and find someone who is of a similar ability or indeed who has been released elsewhere. Maybe even a cheeky bid for someone like Brad Jones?

Posted

No i'm not saying we sign him back (god no), i'm just making the point to people who say he's been our best keeper for ages...we said that about Fulop didn't we. I'm just trying to point out that if we were to lose him and got money for him, maybe it would enable us to go out and find someone who is of a similar ability or indeed who has been released elsewhere. Maybe even a cheeky bid for someone like Brad Jones?

Good lord no!

Yes we did say that about Fulop, so what? We sell Weale and find ourselves back in the same boat again hoping we find someone decent? No thanks

Posted

No i'm not saying we sign him back (god no), i'm just making the point to people who say he's been our best keeper for ages...we said that about Fulop didn't we. I'm just trying to point out that if we were to lose him and got money for him, maybe it would enable us to go out and find someone who is of a similar ability or indeed who has been released elsewhere. Maybe even a cheeky bid for someone like Brad Jones?

wouldn't he be suspended for the first couple of games this season (straight red v us on final day of last season)?

Posted

wouldn't he be suspended for the first couple of games this season (straight red v us on final day of last season)?

He will, though I have never rated him so wouldnt want him anyway.

Posted

Hands off our Weale :angry:

The amount of certain goals he saved last season was extraordinary. Big part of our stubborn defense and should only be for sale for stupid money.

Posted

Chris is easily the best keeper we had since Walker, I don't count keepers we didn't own, and as someone mentioned he is suspect from crosses, which is his main weakness (but if he wasn't he would probably be a prem keeper already and not here) however if they offered £2-3m we'd be foolish not to consider it, Conrad is not as bad as most on here make out, plus we could probably sign someone else for a lot less leaving money to strengthen other areas, its how a club like us HAS to operate unless we get lucky and a new Peter Shilton rocks up in the academy.

That said I would be sad to see him go and personally think at his age, after all the injuries he's had and spending so long as a no 2 at Bristol City, 1st team football, with a chance of promotion might be more important to him, especially when he could wait out his contract (is it 1 or 2 years left?) and still move to a lower prem side at that point

Posted

Chris is easily the best keeper we had since Walker, I don't count keepers we didn't own, and as someone mentioned he is suspect from crosses, which is his main weakness (but if he wasn't he would probably be a prem keeper already and not here) however if they offered £2-3m we'd be foolish not to consider it, Conrad is not as bad as most on here make out, plus we could probably sign someone else for a lot less leaving money to strengthen other areas, its how a club like us HAS to operate unless we get lucky and a new Peter Shilton rocks up in the academy.

That said I would be sad to see him go and personally think at his age, after all the injuries he's had and spending so long as a no 2 at Bristol City, 1st team football, with a chance of promotion might be more important to him, especially when he could wait out his contract (is it 1 or 2 years left?) and still move to a lower prem side at that point

Where has this £2-£3M evaluation come from all of a sudden? I can't see anyone wanting to pay that, if he was to go I'd think it would be closer to £1M if we were lucky.

Remember the £3-4M some people seemed to think the likes of Mattock and Stearman were worth and what they actually went for.

Posted

Where has this £2-£3M evaluation come from all of a sudden? I can't see anyone wanting to pay that, if he was to go I'd think it would be closer to £1M if we were lucky.

Remember the £3-4M some people seemed to think the likes of Mattock and Stearman were worth and what they actually went for.

Becasue most of us overrated both of them, especially Mattock.

I dont really know why West Ham would go after Weale, you can usually always sign a back up keeper for next to nothing, so why pay £1 million for Weale?

Posted

Where has this £2-£3M evaluation come from all of a sudden? I can't see anyone wanting to pay that, if he was to go I'd think it would be closer to £1M if we were lucky.

Remember the £3-4M some people seemed to think the likes of Mattock and Stearman were worth and what they actually went for.

look at the valuation clubs in the Prem have offered for Lonegan, Weale is every bit as good

Posted

look at the valuation clubs in the Prem have offered for Lonegan, Weale is every bit as good

I agree that they're both about the same (Lonegan perhaps slightly better) but what a club values a player at and what their market value is and the price they actually go for are often miles apart. It's clear that Preston don't want to see him leave so they put a high valuation up to put off potential bidders and if anyone is stupid enough to match it then they're quids in.

Posted

I agree that they're both about the same (Lonegan perhaps slightly better) but what a club values a player at and what their market value is and the price they actually go for are often miles apart. It's clear that Preston don't want to see him leave so they put a high valuation up to put off potential bidders and if anyone is stupid enough to match it then they're quids in.

I'm talking about what the clubs are offering

Posted

I'm talking about what the clubs are offering

As far as I knew, West Brom and Blackpool had both offered just over £1M :dunno:

Posted

As far as I knew, West Brom and Blackpool had both offered just over £1M :dunno:

they were also set to offer around £2m until Fergie Jr said he wanted £20m

Posted

To be honest I don't have a problem with Logan in goal if we sell Weale.

Weale is a top keeper and he deserves to be playing at the highest level, I think Logan is good aswell, not as good as Weale but he can do a job for us.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...