Ross 'LCFC' Turner Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Played 6 Won 0 Drew 2 Lost 4 1 Red card aswell. Surley thats no coincidence, so why drop Ben Mee and Miguel Vitor? arguably our two inform defenders. shocking tactics again from Sven
Charl91 Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 I think most of us agree he shouldn't be played to be honest! Mee and Vitor must feel insulted.
Haydos Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 We don't know. It's been discussed to death in all the other threads. I don't know what Vitor and Mee must be feeling
Ross 'LCFC' Turner Posted 16 April 2011 Author Posted 16 April 2011 We don't know. It's been discussed to death in all the other threads. I don't know what Vitor and Mee must be feeling just thought ill'd point out his shocking record, hence why were all so shocked by vitor and mee dropped.
Narborough_fox Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Kill him, gag him, kidknap him, break his leg do anything just get him away from the club i so dearly love as well as that useless braided haired twat Patrick Van Aanholt. I do laugh if that's the future of Chelsea because if it is see you in the Championship soon.
Father Ted Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 I hate that twat. 'Der der der fcuking useless' springs to mind. I hope he reads this and pisses off. I don't want him. Nobody wants him. He's ruined our play off hopes for this season. Hark now hear, the Leicester sing, the CHELSEA RAN AWAY, for I will fight, forever more because of boxing day. I'm not joking, I could do a better job than him and mind you, if I got close to Sven, I'd probably be playing week in week out too.
Charl91 Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 To be fair, I don't mind PVA. I think he's fairly good going foward; maybe not great defensively though, so probably not wise to play both him and naughton at the same time.
Matt Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 After all that flack I got for merely questioned him and his selection, didn't slag him off, just questioned how he got a contract at Chelsea, how he keeps getting selected, looks like people are agreeing now.
Ozwin Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Proper piss take. There must be some sort of clause in the loan deal where by he has to play, there can't be any other reason. Sven normally has things spot on.
sdb Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Kick a man when he's down! Some posts in here go too far. He's been poor. Shouldn't be playing. Silly situation we've gotten ourselves into. Another lesson learnt for next season.
Father Ted Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Kick a man when he's down! Some posts in here go too far. He's been poor. Shouldn't be playing. Silly situation we've gotten ourselves into. Another lesson learnt for next season. How do you think Ben Mee and Miguel Vitor feel like then?
Guest ttfn Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 This is too harsh. He's not been terrible Individually; rather he's a symptom of Sven's nonsensical defensive tinkering. All this is distracting from the proper pasting van Aanholt should be getting. He's starting to make McGivern look reliable
ousefox Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 I don't think Bruma is that bad, just can't play with Bamba. Bruma and Vitor looked better today, but that record does speak for itself and i'd much rather see Vitor and Bamba as the 2 main defenders. Should never have changed the defence after Scunny away. I don't rate PVA either, doesn't have a brain and doesn't seem bothered when he mistakes and doesn't always chase back when he does make them.
Dames Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Only thing Svens got majorly wrong. This guy looks like he thinks he's too good for this level, thinks he can coast without making much effort. Are we getting money on the side for playing him? because it is shocking that he's in the team ahead of Mee let alone Vitor.
MattyFromLE Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Proper piss take. There must be some sort of clause in the loan deal where by he has to play, there can't be any other reason. Sven normally has things spot on. IIRC the fee reduces the more games he plays...
Haydos Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 just thought ill'd point out his shocking record, hence why were all so shocked by vitor and mee dropped. I didn't think he was as bad as Bamba today by a long way. But people have their favourites don't they. I've not seen enough of him to comment too much but the partnership stood out as the problem more than he did. I think it was a mistake bringing him in in the first place as we didn't need him. Bamba + Mee or Mee + Vitor would be preferred if they were settled but he's ****ed around with the centre backs way too much to expect anything more than average defending. On another note, it's funny how Bamba seems to have avoided all criticism today despite having an absolute 'mare.
Corky Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 To me Van Aanholt was worse. Bruma managed to get in some well-timed interceptions and challenges, PVA was struggling against Andy Griffin of all people.
Haydos Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 To me Van Aanholt was worse. Bruma managed to get in some well-timed interceptions and challenges, PVA was struggling against Andy Griffin of all people. This. Also feel Naughton and PVA getting caught up field contributed to Bamba's shite performance as well.
Al-aLondon-Foxile Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 This is too harsh. He's not been terrible Individually; rather he's a symptom of Sven's nonsensical defensive tinkering. All this is distracting from the proper pasting van Aanholt should be getting. He's starting to make McGivern look reliable They're both shit, they're both being played due to some contractual obligation. It sucks. It's wrong. And do you know what, when they've both fooked off back we'll be left with unhappy players who are on contacts and haven't had a look in. And that goes for most of out loanees too.
sdb Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 How do you think Ben Mee and Miguel Vitor feel like then? what's that got to do with it?! some embarrassing posts in here. i'm not a fan, but jeez.
The Doctor Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Proper piss take. There must be some sort of clause in the loan deal where by he has to play, there can't be any other reason. Sven normally has things spot on. Or how about Sven rates Bruma and Bruma impresses more in training than the alternatives? If that clause existed he'd've played on tuesday (he didn't), He didn't play v Brizzle city IIRC when he was available. Personally i think he could be good, but not alongside bamba - both are right-sided CB's and incapable of playing on the left-side which is why it should be one of them and vitor/mee or just vitor - mee.
Jakemoore Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 He's shit, Vaanholt's shit, and as a result we lost today. I'm blaming them for today I really am
The Doctor Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Typical city fans: let's blame 1 or 2 players for anything that goes wrong - First it was oakley, then it was Ricardo, then when he was dropped it returns to Oakley then when people spot he's playing well it turns to the loanees. 11 players go out there on a match day and all 11 have to shoulder the blame rather than it being pinned all on one player.
Simmo86 Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 Typical city fans: let's blame 1 or 2 players for anything that goes wrong - First it was oakley, then it was Ricardo, then when he was dropped it returns to Oakley then when people spot he's playing well it turns to the loanees. 11 players go out there on a match day and all 11 have to shoulder the blame rather than it being pinned all on one player. There always has to be scapegoat though Al!
Simmo86 Posted 16 April 2011 Posted 16 April 2011 There always has to be scapegoat though Al! Its always someones fault.........just not if your names Chris Weale, Sol Bamba, Bruno Berner, Richie Wellens or Martyn Waghorn!! Its these bastard loanees fault who have come here to destroy our season on purpose!!!!!!! Wankers!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.